
Return to
introduction on drug discovery ~
LeadDiscovery Reports
MPEP a prototypical glutamate (mGlu5) receptor
antagonist with similar anxiolytic efficacy compared to diazepam but
with reduced cognitive adverse effects.
Anxiety disorders affect 20% of the total population
across the seven major markets and are commonly treated with
antidepressants. Adverse effects lead to treatment discontinuation in as
many as 16% of patients driving the drug development sector to identify
alternative approaches to anxiety. Benzodiazepines are treated
cautiously by many physicians for reasons of dependency and withdrawal
problems, as well as adverse effects including cognitive impairment.
Glutamate (mGlu5) receptor antagonists are being developed as an
improved class of anxiolytics and here we highlight the efficacy of MPEP,
the prototypical mGlu5 receptor antagonist, which was similar compared
to that of diazepam but at anxiolytic doses produces less cognitive
decline
Anxiety disorders are considered the most prevalent of psychiatric
disorders. However, poor diagnosis rates and treatment outcomes mean
that there is still considerable scope for manufacturers to move into
the anxiety market. Although a fifth of the total population across the
seven major markets suffers from an anxiety disorder only a quarter of
these individuals are diagnosed and therefore treated.
Of the 19 million American that suffer one of the anxiety conditions,
many are treated with antidepressants such as paroxetine which is
considered a gold standard treatment for anxiety disorders across the
seven major markets. However a third of patients require second-line
therapy due to either insufficient efficacy or excessive side effect.
Efficacy is a particular problem during the first few weeks of treatment
given the slow onset time of many antidepressants while as many as 16%
of patients with anxiety disorders discontinue paroxetine treatment due
to side effects. High-potency benzodiazepines, such as diazepam, which
bind to a site on the GABA receptor and act as receptor agonist, relieve
symptoms of anxiety quickly however tolerance and problems upon
withdrawal have led physicians to use this class as a long-term
treatment of anxiety cautiously.
One problem associated with long-term benzodiazepine use is cognitive
decline and a recent meta analysis has reported that cognitive ability
may not return to pre-treatment levels once treatment has been
terminated. Benzodiazepines are the most frequently prescribed
antianxiety drugs in the elderly and in this population, given their
susceptibility to cognitive decline, alternate therapeutic approaches
may be of particular use.
Metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptors modulate glutamatergic
transmission in the CNS and represent a target for neurological and
psychiatric disorders. MPEP is a highly potent and selective
prototypical mGlu5 receptor antagonist developed by Novartis and
characterized by good bioavailability and brain penetration. Anxiolytic-like
activity has been reported in a number of animal models and since
efficacy has been shown to be independent of any benzodiazepine-like
mechanism, mGlu5 receptor antagonists offer an alternative approach to
the treatment of anxiety. Efficacy is observed at doses far below those
doses affecting spontaneous activity and rotarod performance however the
effects of oral MPEP on cognition were, up until now, unknown. Since the
mGlu5 receptor is highly expressed in the hippocampus, a key area of
cognitive function, MPEP could potentially affect cognition. This
possibility is supported by the finding that intracerebral
administration of MPEP impairs spatial and working memory. The featured
Psychopharmacology study was designed to evaluate the cognitive effects
of oral MPEP.
In their study Roche researchers set out to establish a clear
efficacious dose range of MPEP following oral administration in various
models of anxiety. Using identical dosing conditions the effect of
anxiolytic doses of MPEP was then determined in models of working and
spatial memory.
Ballard et al report that MPEP had a significant anxiolytic effect at
10-30 mg/kg (po), comparable in magnitude to diazepam, in two conflict
(Geller-Seifter and Vogel) models of anxiety as well as in the
conditioned emotional response model. There was no effect of MPEP up to
30 mg/kg on working or spatial memory. In contrast, diazepam
significantly impaired performance in both of these assays of cognitive
function.
This important and well controlled study demonstrates that at doses that
produce similar anxiolytic activity, MPEP has considerably less effect
on cognition than does diazepam. These data therefore suggest that mGlu5
receptor antagonists and specifically MPEP may offer an effective yet
safe alternative to antidepressants and benzodiazepines in the treatment
of anxiety.
Entry date Monday, April 11, 2005
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2005 Mar 1; [Epub ahead of print]
Source:
LeadDiscovery
LeadDiscovery and BioPortfolio aims
to provide reliable, insightful analysis on the biotechnology industry. However,
this information is provided "as is" and no representations or
warranties either express or implied of completeness, accuracy, or of any other
nature are made with respect to this information. This information is neither an
offer to sell nor a solicitation to buy the securities of any company. This
information contains forward-looking statements, which involve risks and
uncertainties which may not be listed. The biotechnology industry is an emerging
industry and the securities of the companies mentioned in this report have a
very high degree of risk and volatility. For this reason, this information is
supplied on the condition that the reader will make his or her own determination
as to its suitability for any purpose prior to any use of this information. The
employees and officers of LeadDiscovery and BioPortfolio may hold positions in
some or all of the stocks discussed in this report.
This
abstract has been produced by LeadDiscovery Ltd. Founded by life scientists for
life scientists we aim to help industry identify cutting edge drug discovery
options and academic/biotech institutions maximize the potential of their
research. Abstracts strictly reflect the opinion of LeadDiscovery's editorial
panel. While all reasonable efforts are made to ensure the accuracy of
information provided LeadDiscovery and the publisher BioPortfolio, takes no
responsibility for incorrect or misleading information. LeadDiscovery is
designed for educational and drug development purposes only and is not intended
or designed to offer medical advice or advice of any sort, and must not be used
for such purpose. The information provided through LeadDiscovery and
BioPortfolio should not be used for diagnosing or treating a health problem or a
disease and no reliance should be placed on any information contained in this
abstract or elsewhere on LeadDiscovery's and BioPortfolio's website. It is not
intended to be a substitute for professional care. If you have or suspect you
may have a health problem, you should consult your physician or other health
care provider.