|
Sunday November 08 2009 | Biotechnology feed | All feeds
|
|
|
The involvement of the "Inhibitor of Apoptosis Proteins" (IAP) family has been strongly implicated in the resistance of various cancers to apoptosis (click here for our analysis of this field). The X-linked
inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP) is one particularly well-defined member
of the IAP family. XIAP expression is elevated in non-small cell lung cancer
and acute myelogenous leukemia. With respect to the latter there is a strong
correlation between expression and survival. A convincing body of evidence
supports a direct role of XIAP in the resistance of cancer cells to radiation
and chemotherapeutic intervention. Perhaps most convincing are recent reports
that low dose gamma-irradiation upregulates XIAP in non-small cell lung
carcinoma cells and as a result resistance to radiation-induced apoptosis was
enhanced. On the other hand XIAP antisense sensitized cells to low dose
gamma-irradiation. A similar approach was used to sensitize ovarian carcinoma
cells to cisplatin-induced apoptosis. A greater understanding of the
mechanisms through which XIAP confer resistance and improved strategies for
targeting this phenomena will lead to better anti-cancer treatments and both
of these areas have been addressed in our recent dossier. Most recently,
Japanese researchers investigated the effects of XIAP overexpression on taxol-induced
cell growth arrest and apoptosis in the prostate cancer cell line (LNCaP).
Although the growth rates were reduced in a dose- and time-dependent manner by
taxol, these effects were significantly decreased in cell lines stably
overexpressing XIAP. Taxol treatment was found to induce the cleavage of
pro-caspase-3, followed by apoptosis. Overexpression of XIAP inhibited
apoptosis by attenuating this pro-caspase-3 cleavage and caspase-3 activity.
These results suggest that the overexpression of XIAP inhibits taxol-induced
apoptosis through the decrease of caspase-3 activity and inhibition of the
processing of pro-caspase-3. Between 1970 and 1994, cancer claimed the lives of about 0.5 million Americans every year. According to the most recent statistics, it was estimated that approximately 1.3 million new cases of cancer would have been diagnosed and 555,500 people would have died from cancer in the United States in 2002. The development of therapeutic strategies for the prevention and treatment of cancer thus represents a key priority for the pharmaceutical industry (see "Cancer Treatment 2002" for a full analysis of current and future pharmaceutical approaches to cancer). Prostate cancer is one of the most common forms of cancer, however prognosis is often good with tumors being responsive to hormonal therapies. The development of hormone resistance does however result is a dramatic drop in prognosis and a narrowing of therapeutic options for the clinician. This results in a limited median survival of 10-12 months for the patient. While cytotoxic chemotherapy has been utilized for many years, its efficacy has been disappointing. The present study suggest that the use of XIAP inhibitors may dramatically improve the response to chemotherapeutic options such as taxol thus improving the treatment of patients with hormone resistant prostate cancer. Entry date Adapted from Nomura et al, Urol Res 2003 Mar;31(1):37-44 - Interested in collaborating with this group? Contact LeadDiscovery or the authors direct.
Interested in collaborating with this group? Contact leaddiscovery@bioportfolio.co.uk Projects such as these are overviewed in full DiscoveryDossiers. LeadDiscovery and BioPortfolio aims to provide reliable, insightful analysis on the biotechnology industry. However, this information is provided "as is" and no representations or warranties either express or implied of completeness, accuracy, or of any other nature are made with respect to this information. This information is neither an offer to sell nor a solicitation to buy the securities of any company. This information contains forward-looking statements, which involve risks and uncertainties which may not be listed. The biotechnology industry is an emerging industry and the securities of the companies mentioned in this report have a very high degree of risk and volatility. For this reason, this information is supplied on the condition that the reader will make his or her own determination as to its suitability for any purpose prior to any use of this information. The employees and officers of LeadDiscovery and BioPortfolio may hold positions in some or all of the stocks discussed in this report. This abstract has been produced by LeadDiscovery Ltd. Founded by life scientists for life scientists we aim to help industry identify cutting edge drug discovery options and academic/biotech institutions maximize the potential of their research. Abstracts strictly reflect the opinion of LeadDiscovery's editorial panel. While all reasonable efforts are made to ensure the accuracy of information provided LeadDiscovery and the publisher BioPortfolio, takes no responsibility for incorrect or misleading information. LeadDiscovery is designed for educational and drug development purposes only and is not intended or designed to offer medical advice or advice of any sort, and must not be used for such purpose. The information provided through LeadDiscovery and BioPortfolio should not be used for diagnosing or treating a health problem or a disease and no reliance should be placed on any information contained in this abstract or elsewhere on LeadDiscovery's and BioPortfolio's website. It is not intended to be a substitute for professional care. If you have or suspect you may have a health problem, you should consult your physician or other health care provider. |
|
|