|
| |

Return to
introduction on drug discovery ~
LeadDiscovery Reports
The development of novel small molecule XIAP inhibitors with anti-cancer
activity
The treatment of cancer
represents a major unmet market. This field is highly segmented both in
terms of cancer sub-types and the various pharmacological classes
available to oncologists (for a full analysis of the potential of
different patient groups and various anti-cancer strategies in
development or on the market click here for our feature “The
Cancer Market Outlook to 2008”).
The efficacy and adverse effect profile of many current gold-standard
treatments of cancer is sub-optimal and hence heavy R&D investment is
driving innovative compounds in clinical development. Apoptosis
stimulators have emerged as one group of key targets for the control of
cancer. This therapeutic class has, however, remained predominantly
experimental since early generation apoptosis stimulators lacked
specificity, efficacy and were susceptibility to drug resistance.
From a molecular point of view the development of apoptosis stimulators
has concentrated heavily on the caspases and endogenous inhibitors of
apoptosis, predominantly Bcl-2 proteins. Over the past few years a
considerable amount of research has been conducted and our view of
apoptosis has changed dramatically. Major advances have included the
emergence of the IAP ("Inhibitor
of Apoptosis Proteins") family and to meet the development of this
field LeadDiscovery has recently produced a full analysis of the IAPs
and how they can be targeted for the treatment of cancer (Click here for
this report). This field has grown exponentially since 1995 and
continues to do so. Although XIAP and survivin remain the better known
members of this family, numerous human IAPs have now been identified.
Members of this family represent key regulators of apoptosis.
The three main apoptotic pathways identified thus far (the
mitochondrial, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, and death receptor
pathways) are activated by caspase-9, -12, and -8, respectively. The
mitochondrial pathway may also serve as a point of convergence for the
other two pathways. The down-stream caspase-3 is the primary executioner
caspase.
The X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP) is one particularly
well-defined member of the IAP family. XIAP expression is elevated in
various cancers for example non-small cell lung cancer and acute
myelogenous leukemia. With respect to the latter there is a strong
correlation between expression and survival. A convincing body of
evidence supports a direct role of XIAP in the resistance of cancer
cells to radiation and chemotherapeutic intervention. Perhaps most
convincing are reports that low dose gamma-irradiation upregulates XIAP
in non-small cell lung carcinoma cells inducing resistance to
radiation-induced apoptosis. On the other hand XIAP antisense sensitized
cells to low dose gamma-irradiation. A similar approach was used to
sensitize ovarian carcinoma cells to cisplatin-induced apoptosis.
XIAP has been shown to attenuate pro-caspase-3 cleavage and caspase-3
activity and in prostate cancer cells this leads to the inhibition of
taxol-induced apoptosis. This inhibitory activity as well as the
inhibition of caspase-7 is dependent on the BIR2 domain and its flanking
regions within XIAP. A second BIR domain, BIR3, suppresses caspase-9.
While antisense technology has been used to establish a proof of concept
for inhibiting XIAP, small molecule inhibitors of this protein are more
sought after and in their recent Cancer Cell paper, Schimmer et al have
made the important breakthrough describing the identification of such
inhibitors.
Using a caspase-3 enzyme derepression assay (the assay was based on a
mixture of recombinant caspase-3 repressed by XIAP) to screen eleven
mixture-based small molecule combinatorial libraries (constituting
approximately one million compounds), and then individual molecules
purified from mixtures displaying activity in the assay, Schimmer et al
identified 36 hits that increased caspase-3 activity. Of these 8 came
from a library of nearly 100,000 polyphenylureas. Each of these
molecules also restored caspase-7 activity but had no effect on
caspase-9 suggesting that they acted at BIR2 or its flanking region.
This was confirmed using a second assay in which XIAP was repressed by
BIR2.
The potency of the polyphenylureas was in the micromolar range, and with
a similar potency these molecules induced apoptosis in Jurkat cells. The
active polyphenylureas were selective for XIAP and furthermore
cytotoxicity was specifically induced in fibroblasts expressing XIAP
suggesting that in contrast to conventional chemotherapeutic molecules
the cytotoxicity of these XIAPs would be restricted to cancer cells.
The anti-cancer activity of the XIAP inhibitors was then investigated
further against the NCI’s panel of 60 cancer cell lines, each of which
expresses XIAP. For 4 representative XIAP inhibitors the mean cytotoxic
activity across this panel was approximately 1-20 micromolar, 10-fold
lower than doxorubicin and similar to that of etopiside. When
investigated clonogenic survival was also reduced within this
concentration range. Furthermore the XIAP inhibitors also potentiated
the effects of a variety of anti-cancer drugs. As well as being
effective against multiple cell lines, these molecules were also
cytotoxic to primary cultures of chronic lymphocytic and myolegenous
leukemia cells. This not only established efficacy under conditions
closer to those of the clinic but also demonstrated that cell death
could be produced in both slowly dividing primary cultures as well as
more rapidly dividing cell lines.
In a final study, two representative polyphenylureas were shown to
reduce the size of established colon or prostate cancer xenografts by
over 50% at 30mg/kg ip. Even at doses ten-fold higher than this no
adverse effects were observed.
This important study shows for the first time that molecules able to
relieve endogenous inhibition of the caspases can directly kill cancer
cells as opposed to only being able to synergize with other cytotoxic
agents. In contrast non-cancerous cells were insensitive to the
apoptotic effects of the polyphenylureas. These findings are important
on many different levels. Firstly, it demonstrates that cancer cells
differ from their non-cancerous counterparts in that although caspase
levels are elevated in tumors cells, apoptosis is in a state of chronic
repression as a result of IAP over-expression. This means that
overcoming this repression represents a highly selective approach to the
treatment of cancer. Second, it establishes and explains the lack of
adverse effects seen following treatment with the polyphenylureas
suggesting that this new class of drug will have a broad therapeutic
window. Thirdly, although the polyphenylureas may be effective as a
monotherapy, they have been shown to enhance the cytotoxic effects of a
range of anti-cancer agents. Further development of this class towards
the clinic is therefore eagerly awaited.
Entry date Tuesday, June 08, 2004
Adapted from Schimmer et al,
Cancer Cell. 2004 Jan;5(1):25-35.
LeadDiscovery and BioPortfolio aims
to provide reliable, insightful analysis on the biotechnology industry. However,
this information is provided "as is" and no representations or
warranties either express or implied of completeness, accuracy, or of any other
nature are made with respect to this information. This information is neither an
offer to sell nor a solicitation to buy the securities of any company. This
information contains forward-looking statements, which involve risks and
uncertainties which may not be listed. The biotechnology industry is an emerging
industry and the securities of the companies mentioned in this report have a
very high degree of risk and volatility. For this reason, this information is
supplied on the condition that the reader will make his or her own determination
as to its suitability for any purpose prior to any use of this information. The
employees and officers of LeadDiscovery and BioPortfolio may hold positions in
some or all of the stocks discussed in this report.
This
abstract has been produced by LeadDiscovery Ltd. Founded by life scientists for
life scientists we aim to help industry identify cutting edge drug discovery
options and academic/biotech institutions maximize the potential of their
research. Abstracts strictly reflect the opinion of LeadDiscovery's editorial
panel. While all reasonable efforts are made to ensure the accuracy of
information provided LeadDiscovery and the publisher BioPortfolio, takes no
responsibility for incorrect or misleading information. LeadDiscovery is
designed for educational and drug development purposes only and is not intended
or designed to offer medical advice or advice of any sort, and must not be used
for such purpose. The information provided through LeadDiscovery and
BioPortfolio should not be used for diagnosing or treating a health problem or a
disease and no reliance should be placed on any information contained in this
abstract or elsewhere on LeadDiscovery's and BioPortfolio's website. It is not
intended to be a substitute for professional care. If you have or suspect you
may have a health problem, you should consult your physician or other health
care provider.
| |
|