|
Saturday July 04 2009 | Biotechnology feed | All feeds
|
|
|
Treatment of IBD through selective prostaglandin receptor agonists? Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is an umbrella term used to describe two distinct clinical conditions, ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. In 2001, the number of prevalent cases of IBD totaled 547,720 and 1,122,300, respectively, in the major pharmaceutical markets. The total sales of pharmacologic therapies to treat IBD in these markets were estimated as $516.8 million in 1998. This figure is expected to increase by 10% each year to $836 million in 2003, and by 3% each year afterward to $970.4 million in 2008. Classic therapies of IBD have centered on the use of 5-ASA agents that prevent the synthesis of prostaglandins. Prostaglandins can however play a cytoprotective role and indeed the dependence of the gastrointestinal tract on these eicosanoids to maintain mucosal integrity has driven the recent development of mucosa sparing COX-2 inhibitors. Likewise the development of specific prostaglandin receptor agonists could have potential in the treatment of disease associated with disruption of the intestinal barrier such as IBD. The potential of this approach has grown with our greater understanding of the various subtypes of prostanoid receptors. Japanese researchers have investigated the sensitivity of mice deficient in 8 known receptor subtypes to dextran sodium sulfate (DSS), a commonly employed inducer of experimental colitis. Among the prostanoid receptor-deficient mice, only EP4-deficient mice and not mice deficient in DP, EP1, EP2, EP3, FP, IP, or TP developed severe colitis with 3% DSS treatment, which induced only marginal colitis in wild-type mice. This phenotype was mimicked in wild-type mice by administration of an EP4-selective antagonist (AE3-208). The EP4 deficiency impaired mucosal barrier function and induced epithelial loss, crypt damage, and aggregation of neutrophils and lymphocytes in the colon. Conversely, administration of an EP4-selective agonist (AE1-734) to wild-type mice ameliorated severe colitis normally induced with 7% DSS, while that of AE3-208 suppressed recovery from colitis and induced significant proliferation of CD4+ T cells. In vitro AE3-208 enhanced and AE1-734 suppressed the proliferation and Th1 cytokine production of lamina propria mononuclear cells from the colon. DNA microarray analysis revealed elevated expression of genes associated with immune response and reduced expression of genes with mucosal repair and remodeling in the colon of EP4-deficient mice. EP4 thus appears to maintain intestinal homeostasis by supporting mucosal integrity and downregulating immune response. The development of specific EP4 agonists could thus be of considerable benefit to IBD sufferers. Link to journal abstract:
Interested in collaborating with this group? Contact leaddiscovery@bioportfolio.co.uk LeadDiscovery and BioPortfolio aims to provide reliable, insightful analysis on the biotechnology industry. However, this information is provided "as is" and no representations or warranties either express or implied of completeness, accuracy, or of any other nature are made with respect to this information. This information is neither an offer to sell nor a solicitation to buy the securities of any company. This information contains forward-looking statements, which involve risks and uncertainties which may not be listed. The biotechnology industry is an emerging industry and the securities of the companies mentioned in this report have a very high degree of risk and volatility. For this reason, this information is supplied on the condition that the reader will make his or her own determination as to its suitability for any purpose prior to any use of this information. The employees and officers of LeadDiscovery and BioPortfolio may hold positions in some or all of the stocks discussed in this report. This abstract has been produced by LeadDiscovery Ltd. Founded by life scientists for life scientists we aim to help industry identify cutting edge drug discovery options and academic/biotech institutions maximize the potential of their research. Abstracts strictly reflect the opinion of LeadDiscovery's editorial panel. While all reasonable efforts are made to ensure the accuracy of information provided LeadDiscovery and the publisher BioPortfolio, takes no responsibility for incorrect or misleading information. LeadDiscovery is designed for educational and drug development purposes only and is not intended or designed to offer medical advice or advice of any sort, and must not be used for such purpose. The information provided through LeadDiscovery and BioPortfolio should not be used for diagnosing or treating a health problem or a disease and no reliance should be placed on any information contained in this abstract or elsewhere on LeadDiscovery's and BioPortfolio's website. It is not intended to be a substitute for professional care. If you have or suspect you may have a health problem, you should consult your physician or other health care provider. |
|
|