|
| |
| |
|
 |
|
Gynaecological cancer treatment enters new era of patient-tailored
care
|
Friday 16th October 2009: Advances in cancer prevention and treatment
reported at this week’s premier European congress for specialists in
gynaecological cancers show that care is being more effectively tailored to the
needs of individual women, so that survival can be improved without the cost of
added complications and reduced quality of life.
Speaking at this week’s 16th International Meeting of the European Society of
Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) in Belgrade, Serbia, the Society’s new President,
Professor Ate van der Zee, from the Netherlands, stressed the value of this new
approach:
“Our latest treatments take account of the fact that every woman is different,
and it isn’t enough just to try to improve life expectancy. We need to try to
minimise the effects of treatment on a woman’s working and family life, and to
take more account of whether she still wants to have children.
“We have also learned how important it is to concentrate our expertise in
specialist centres, especially when we are treating the rarer gynaecological
cancers, so that women have access to the most up to date knowledge and
expertise that doctors specifically trained in gynaecological cancer can
provide.
“By building this expertise we can also ensure that new discoveries made in
laboratories across Europe are translated into clinical treatments as
efficiently as possible as we develop ever more refined therapies tailored to
the unique genetic and other characteristics of our patients.”
Notes for Editors:
Summaries of key advances in gynaecological oncology announced at this year’s
ESGO congress are summarised in the following series of short reports.
For further information, or picture of Professor van de Zee, please contact:
Hannah Stacey Tali Eisenberg-Nissim
Athena Medical PR Kenes Media
+44 (0)208 956 2289 / +44 (0)7984 496 441 +972 3 9727535 / +972 54 6787835
hannah@athenamedicalpr.com
teisenberg@kenes.com or
press@kenes.com
Nobel scientist urges wider vaccination against HPV infection to achieve
eradication
A global vaccination programme against human papilloma virus (HPV), to include
boys as well as girls, could lead to eradication of the virus and virtual
disappearance of cervical cancer, predicted Nobel Prize winner, Professor Harald
zur Hausen, after delivering the key-note lecture at the 16th International
Meeting of the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) in Belgrade,
Serbia, this week.
Professor zur Hausen, who was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine
in 2008 for his discovery of HPV as the cause of cervical cancer, explained that
although HPV prevention will impact mainly on women’s health, it also has
important implications for men’s health:
“If we wish to achieve eradication within a reasonable period of time, we will
need to vaccinate both sexes, and research has shown that boys respond to
vaccination in the same way as girls. The main risk of developing cancer after
HPV infection is with women and, because of the cost of vaccines, it has been
decided to start with girls. But other cancers associated with HPV infection,
such as anal and oral cancer, are more common in men, and genital warts occur in
both sexes. So there is good reason to vaccinate boys before the onset of sexual
activity as well,” said Professor zur Hausen.
He suggested that future reductions in production costs and development of
cheaper vaccines will make wider vaccination a realistic option, and added that
a major reduction in HPV 16 and 18 – the viruses which cause 70-80% of human
papilloma infections – would probably enable the interval between currently used
cervical screening tests to be extended. The introduction of self sampling by
women, using new tests for HPV DNA, would also help to simplify screening
procedures.
“A therapeutic intervention is also needed to protect people after they have
acquired HPV infection, and it would be a great advantage to have targeted
chemotherapy that would block viral functions that are responsible for
development of precursor and malignant lesions. A lot of laboratories are
working on this and, although I know of nothing yet, it will hopefully not be
too long before we see progress,” concluded Professor zur Hausen.
High dose folate and B vitamin supplements increase uterine cancer risk
Women who take large amounts of folate, vitamin B2, B6 or B12 supplements may be
increasing their risk of uterine cancer, according to research presented at the
16th International Meeting of the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO)
in Belgrade, Serbia, 11-14 October 2009.
Results from a 20 year follow up of dietary intake in over 23,000 postmenopausal
women taking part in the Iowa Women’s Health Study, have shown that women who
consumed large amounts of the supplements were twice as likely to get type II
uterine cancer than women who had normal intakes, although there was no effect
on type I uterine cancer.
Dr S Uccella, from the department of gynaecologic surgery at the Mayo Clinic,
Rochester, USA., explained that the results contrasted with the expected
protective effects of the supplements and further investigation showed that,
while a folate intake of 200-600mcg/day did have a protective effect, taking
higher levels nearer 1000mcg/day increased the risk of uterine cancer.
He concluded that the research could have implications for women’s health in
countries such as the USA and Canada, where folate and B vitamins are added to
foodstuffs, and other countries considering similar action.
Broader age range recommended for cervical screening
Cervical cancer screening programmes that limit tests to women aged 30-60 years
are missing a significant proportion of women who are at risk of getting the
disease. An analysis of 401 cases of cervical cancer diagnosed in the
Netherlands, where screening is only offered to women aged 30-60, has shown that
19% were in women aged under 30 and 12% were in women over 60.
The analysis, reported by Dr Roosmarie de Bie at the 16th International Meeting
of the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) in Belgrade, Serbia,
11-14 October 2009, also showed that 40% of cervical cancer cases were in women
who had regular screening tests, and 25% had a normal smear within the five
years before their diagnosis, suggesting a need for more sensitive tests.
Dr de Bie, from Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The
Netherlands, concluded that underscreening together with insufficient
sensitivity are the main problems of the national screening programme, and its
effectiveness can be improved by interventions to increase the participation
rate and the sensitivity of the screening test. She recommended that the target
age-range of the current programme should be re-evaluated.
Dr de Bie also told delegates that a project underway in Nijmegen is piloting
the use of home HPV DNA tests in an effort to reach more women who are currently
missing out on conventional smear tests.
Currently in the Netherlands, there are 600 new cases of cervical cancer each
year despite the presence of an established national screening programme.
Cancer treatment during pregnancy need not risk baby’s health
Many women who discover they have cancer while pregnant risk their own health by
postponing treatment. But an international collaborative study carried out in
Belgium, the Netherlands and the Czech Republic, has shown that, while babies
born to women who undergo cytotoxic treatment during pregnancy tend to be born
prematurely and are small for gestational age, most achieve a good outcome and
the incidence of congenital malformations is comparable to the general
population.
The analysis, reported at the 16th International Meeting of the European Society
of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) in Belgrade, Serbia, 11-14 October 2009,
followed up 215 pregnancies in women diagnosed with invasive cancer between 1998
and 2008. Cancer treatment was started during pregnancy in 57% of cases, and it
was delayed until after the birth in 27% of pregnancies. The remainder ended in
spontaneous miscarriage or were terminated. Delivery was induced in 72% of
pregnancies and 54% of children were born preterm.
Babies exposed to cytotoxic treatment in the womb were more likely to be born
prematurely (12%, p=0.012), and to be small for gestational age children (24%,
p=0.001). However, the incidence of congenital malformations was comparable to
the general population.
Dr Kristel Van Kalsteren, from the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven,
Belgium, concluded that pregnancies complicated by maternal cancer have an
overall satisfactory outcome, though the prevention of iatrogenic prematurity
deserves attention. She recommended that such women who are diagnosed with
cancer while pregnant should be treated in a multidisciplinary setting with
access to a maternal and neonatal intensive care unit.
HPV vaccines indicate further benefits for cervical cancer protection
New human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine studies presented at the 16th
International Meeting of the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO)
in Belgrade, Serbia, this week have confirmed sustained protection against
precancerous cervical lesions in healthy young women, as well as beneficial
effects for women previously treated for cervical, vulvar or vaginal precancers
or genital warts. Latest safety data also confirm the low levels of adverse
events associated with the vaccines.
In a study of 1113 healthy women aged 15-25 years vaccinated with the anti-HPV
16/18 vaccine, Cervarix, sustained immunogenicity and 100% efficacy against HPV
16 and 18 related cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 (CIN2+) lesions was
reported at 7.3 years follow up – the longest to date with the vaccine.
Medically significant adverse events occurred in 8.1% of vaccinated women and
6.2% of placebo-treated women, and serious adverse events occurred in 1.8% and
2.4% respectively.
Presenting the data at a late-breaker session of the congress, trial
investigator Dr Newton De Carvalha, from the Hospital de Clínicas da
Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba – Paraná, Brazil, concluded that that
the vaccine was highly effective against HPV infection and cytohistological
endpoints associated with HPV 16/18, and had similar safety to placebo.
In a second analysis, Dr Elmar Joura, from the Medical University of Vienna,
Austria, showed efficacy data on 1350 women who took part in placebo controlled
trials of the anti-HPV 6,11,16,18 vaccine, Gardasil, following treatment for
cervical, vulvar or vaginal precancers or genital warts. These data, collected
an average 1.5-1.6 years post therapy, showed efficacy of up to 74% in
preventing HPV 6/11/16/18 associated CIN, and efficacy of up to 79% for
prevention of further precancerous vulvar or vaginal lesions or genital warts.
Dr Joura concluded that women who have been treated for cervical, vulvar or
vaginal pre-cancer or genital warts, and are therefore at increased risk of
further disease, can be told that they too will benefit from HPV vaccination.
Kinder cervical cancer surgery reduces complications without jeopardising
survival
Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer causes less bladder and
colorectal dysfunction than standard techniques, but doesn’t adversely affect
survival, These are the reassuring findings from two studies carried out in
Italy and the Czech Republic, and reported at the 16th International Meeting of
the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) in Belgrade, Serbia,
11-14 October 2009.
In a study of 200 patients reported by Dr Francesco Raspagliesi, from the
National Cancer Institute in Milan, Italy, two and five year disease free
survival after nerve-sparing surgery was 89% and 81% respectively – comparable
with survival rates commonly reported in studies of radical hysterectomy in
which nerve-sparing techniques are not used. But the complication rate of 3.5%
was lower than seen with conventional techniques.
The second study, carried out by Dr David Cibula and colleagues at the General
Faculty Hospital of Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic, directly
compared morbidity six months after nerve sparing surgery with that seen with
two standard radical hysterectomy techniques in 87 women with cervical cancer.
Those who had surgery which left key pelvic nerves intact had significantly less
urinary incontinence, defecation irregularity, bladder emptying problems and
nocturia than those had more invasive surgery (p<0.05 all parameters).
Dr Cibula concluded that it was nerve-sparing techniques which made the
difference to the complications that women experienced after surgery, rather
than the extent of the hysterectomy itself, and Dr Raspagliesi recommended that
nerve-sparing techniques should now be considered for all cervical cancer
surgery.
CALYPSO trial shows new chemotherapy combination prolongs progression free
survival in ovarian cancer
Treating women with relapsed platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer with combined
carboplatin and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin prolongs progression free
survival and is associated with a lower risk of severe, long lasting nerve
damage than standard carboplatin/paclitaxel treatment.
This was the key conclusion from the international multicentre CALYPSO trial
reported this week at the 16th International Meeting of the European Society of
Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) in Belgrade, Serbia, by Dr Mark Heywood, from the
BCCA Vancouver Cancer Centre, Vancouver, Cancer.
Data from 986 patients treated in 16 countries in Europe, North America, the
Middle East, Australia and New Zealand showed progression free survival of 11.3
months and 9.4 months respectively (p=0.005) for the carboplatin/pegylated
doxorubicin vs carboplatin/paclitaxel combinations in women with relapsed
platinum sensitive disease (ovarian cancer that had relapsed more than six
months after treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy).
Severe neutropenia occurred in 35% and 46% respectively of patients in the two
groups, severe neuropathy in 5% and 28% and alopecia in 7% and 84%. Hand-foot
syndrome – a well documented inflammatory condition associated with pegylated
doxorubicin was more common in the carboplatin/pegylated doxorubicin group (13%
vs 2%) and severe thrombocytopenia was also more common (16% vs 6%). Treatment
needed to be discontinued early in 4.3% of patients in the carboplatin/pegylated
doxorubicin group, compared to 14% of those on the standard regime.
Dr Heywood pointed out that an unexpected advantage of adding doxorubicin to
carboplatin was the reduction in sensitivity reactions to carboplatin seen in
the novel treatment group compared to that normally seen with carboplatin alone
or in other combinations.
He concluded that the carboplatin/pegylated doxorubicin combination provided a
superior risk benefit ratio compared with carboplatin/paclitaxel for women with
relapsed, platinum sensitive ovarian cancer.
Keyhole surgery shows quality of life benefits for women with early
endometrial cancer
Women who have laparoscopic surgery for early stage endometrial cancer have a
shorter hospital stay, less pain and faster recovery within the first six weeks
after surgery, according to preliminary results of a comparative study of
laparoscopic and open surgery, reported by Dr Claudia Bijen, at the 16th
International Meeting of the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO)
in Belgrade, Serbia.
Dr Bijen, from the University of Groningen, the Netherlands, presented data from
185 women with early endometrial cancer who underwent laparoscopic surgery and
94 who had open surgery. While there was no significant difference in major
complications between patients in the two groups, those undergoing laparoscopic
surgery had significantly better quality of life scores six weeks after surgery,
less pain and were able to return to work more quickly than those who had open
procedures.
Dr Bijen stressed that the study design ensured that laparoscopic surgery was
carried out by skilled surgeons – something which would be important if the
laparoscopic technique is taken up more generally in clinical practice.
Ovarian cancer patients have lower death risk when treated by experts
Women with ovarian cancer are less likely to die from their disease if they are
treated by specialist gynaecological oncologists than if they are cared for by
general gynaecologists, according to the results of a study carried out in
Scotland, UK, and reported at this week’s 16th International Meeting of the
European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) in Belgrade, Serbia.
An analysis of survival data from a cohort of 912 ovarian cancer patients
treated in the West of Scotland Managed Clinical Network showed a 24% lower risk
of death in women treated by gynaecological oncologists who specialise in the
treatment of gynaecological cancer than by general gynaecologists who treat the
full range of gynaecological problems that women can experience.
Reporting her findings at a late breaker session of the congress, Dr Alex
Stirling, from the West of Scotland Cancer Surveillance Unit, explained that
recent reorganisation of cancer services in Scotland was designed to provide
equal standards of care for patients wherever they lived. However, some women
continue to be treated away from larger cancer centres, and do not therefore
have access to gynaecological oncologists.
Dr Stirling added that, by the end of the year, cancer services in the area will
be centralised, and selection of cases for surgery will be decided by a
specialist multidisciplinary team – hopefully helping to reduce remaining
inequalities of care and ensuring that more difficult cases are treated by
gynaecological oncologists.
Serbian women missing out on cervical cancer prevention
Three quarters of sexually active students who took part in a survey of cervical
screening had never had a Pap smear, despite being aware of the importance of
such tests, according to results of a study carried out in Serbia – the country
with the highest incidence and mortality from cervical cancer in Europe.
Speaking at the 16th International Meeting of the European Society of
Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) in Belgrade, Serbia, 11-14 October 2009, Dr
Olivera Tĕsić, from the Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, Serbia, described data
from a questionnaire administered to 727 female students, 294 students aged
younger than 21 years old and 433 students aged 21-24 years old. Although 82% of
the women were sexually active, 77% had never had a smear, despite the fact that
over 70% of students knew the importance of regular smears. In contrast, 73%
were unaware of the role of HPV in cervical cancer – even though about half of
the students were medical students.
Dr Tĕsić concluded that if such well educated young women were missing out on
regular smears and were unaware of the role of HPV, this raised significant
doubts about awareness and uptake in other young women in Serbia. In May 2008,
the Serbian government agreed that a national cervical cancer screening
programme should be implemented.
| |
|