|
ABOUT DATAMONITOR HEALTHCARE 2About the Immunology & Inflammation pharmaceutical analysis team 2CHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3Strategic scoping and focus 3Datamonitor insight into the disease market 3Related reports 5Upcoming reports 5CHAPTER 2 DISEASE OVERVIEW 7Definition of celiac disease 8What is celiac disease? 8Pathogenesis 10Understanding of the pathogenesis has increased in recent times 10Genetic component to celiac disease 10HLA involvement in celiac disease 11HLA testing used as a negative predictor of celiac disease 11Clinical presentation of celiac disease 12Symptoms of celiac disease 12Clinical manifestation of celiac disease varies greatly with age 12Classical symptoms are associated with gastrointestinal involvement 13The celiac disease iceberg 14Typical celiac disease 15Atypical celiac disease 16Individuals who could potentially develop celiac disease 17Non-responsive, refractory celiac disease 18Reassessment of celiac disease diagnosis is necessary to confirm refractory disease 18Classification of refractory celiac disease involves phenotype of intraepithelial lymphocytes 19Management of celiac disease 20Strict adherence to a gluten-free diet remains the cornerstone of treatment 20Monitoring adherence to a gluten-free diet 22Treatment of celiac disease complications 23Management of refractory celiac disease 23Corticosteroids are first-line treatments in refractory celiac disease patients 24Evidence suggests budesonide demonstrates efficacy in some patients 24Datamonitor estimates $3m budesonide sales in celiac disease in 2008 27Immunosuppressants such as azathioprine and ciclosporin are used as second-line therapy in refractory celiac disease 28Chemotherapeutic agents used in type II refractory celiac disease 29Anti-TNFs are effective rescue therapies in refractory celiac disease where there are limited alternatives 29High-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation could provide effective therapy in type II refractory celiac disease patients 30CHAPTER 3 EPIDEMIOLOGY 31Wide range in celiac disease prevalence among distinct populations 32Celiac disease prevalence in specific "at-risk" population subgroups 33First-degree relatives 33Autoimmune diseases 33Genetic diseases 34Prevalence of celiac disease in the seven major markets 34Datamonitor estimates there are between 4m and 7.5m celiac disease sufferers in the seven major markets in 2009 34Over two million celiac disease sufferers in the US 35Celiac disease is extremely rare in Japan and few epidemiology studies exist 37France lacks population-based studies for celiac disease 39Lower celiac disease prevalence in Germany than in the UK 40There is an abundance of robust epidemiology studies for celiac disease originating from Italy 41Spain has the smallest celiac disease population in the seven major markets 43UK prevalence of celiac disease is the highest of the major EU regions 44Outside the seven major markets 46Potential worldwide celiac disease population could be upwards of 25 million 46CHAPTER 4 DIAGNOSIS OF CELIAC DISEASE 48Differential diagnosis is crucial to exclude other diseases 49Accurate diagnosis relies on a number of different techniques 49Triad of examination, biopsy and gluten-free diet confirm diagnosis of celiac disease 49Serological tests are a cheap and non-invasive method for identification of patients with potential celiac disease 52Endoscopy alone is not sufficient to diagnose celiac disease 54Video capsule endoscopy is a growing area of potential use 54Biopsy is still gold-standard in celiac disease diagnosis 57Histologic grading is based on the Marsh score 58Serologic algorithm may obviate the need for biopsy 60Celiac disease vs. irritable bowel syndrome 62Celiac disease and irritable bowel syndrome have overlapping characteristics 62Evidence suggests between 3-11% of irritable bowel syndrome patients have evidence of celiac disease 62Multiple physician specialties are involved in celiac disease diagnosis and management 64Most referrals to specialist celiac centers come from primary care 65Celiac disease diagnosis continues to be plagued by problems 67Diagnosis rates in the US lag behind rates in Europe 67Diagnostic delay is common in both primary and secondary care 71Low awareness from primary care physicians is a major contributor to low diagnosis rates 72The potential of point-of-care and home testing kits in celiac disease 73The Biocard celiac disease test kit offers potential for a quick and accurate diagnosis. 73Home testing kits may help to drive up diagnosis rates but only if the patient then presents to secondary care 76CHAPTER 5 UNMET NEEDS 78Celiac disease is an area of significant unmet need 79Summary of unmet needs 79Pharmacological treatments for celiac disease 79Efforts to increase diagnosis rates 81Better celiac disease awareness in the general population and among primary care is essential 82Advocacy groups are active in the area of raising disease awareness 82Better ways to monitor adherence to a gluten-free diet 83Investigate prevalence of celiac disease in patients with IBS 84Alternative diagnostic approach to invasive endoscopy and biopsy 84Regulatory guidance on clinical trial design 84CHAPTER 6 COMMERCIAL POTENTIAL 86Celiac disease presents as a potentially lucrative market 87Pharmacological treatment will not replace the gluten-free diet 87Market access strategies in celiac disease 87Scenario one: pharmacological treatments offered to patients with persistent symptoms despite gluten-free diet 87Scenario two: pharmacological treatments targeted at wider celiac disease population 91Pricing determined by high unmet need, level of gluten sensitivity and type of celiac disease 91Celiac disease patient population and market valuation model 95Datamonitor estimates that celiac disease will grow quickly to become a billion-dollar market 95CHAPTER 7 NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT AND PIPELINE ANALYSIS 103Clinical trial design 104Gluten challenge in celiac disease patients on a gluten-free diet 104Clinical trial endpoints 104Primary endpoints 104Secondary endpoints 105There is no industry guidance on celiac disease clinical trial design 107Villous atrophy will remain the most important factor to consider for regulatory agency approval 108Companies involved in celiac disease R&D 109Small, privately held, biopharmaceutical companies are the power houses in the field of celiac disease 109Celiac disease pipeline overview in 2009 110The celiac disease pipeline is small and not significantly advanced 110Pipeline candidates target several different mechanisms 111Key opinion leaders believe that enzymatic degradation of gluten holds the most promise for celiac disease 113Phase II 114AT-1001 (larazotide acetate, SPD-550; Alba Therapeutics, Shire) 114AT-1001 is in development for celiac disease, but also other gastrointestinal disorders 114Alba Therapeutics estimates AT-1001 could launch for celiac disease in the US by 2011 115Shire's in-licensing deal for AT-1001 strengthens the drug's commercial potential 116Alba values AT-1001's US market value at over $0.5billion 117Clinical trial data overview 117Alba will present Phase IIb clinical trial data at DDW 2009 121While the drug failed to meet its primary endpoint, AT-1001's Phase IIa clinical trial data were encouraging 121CCX-282 (Traficet-EN; ChemoCentryx) 123CCX-282 in development for celiac and Crohn's disease 123GlaxoSmithKline could exercise its option to commercialize CCX-282 with proof-of-concept data 126Phase I 127ALV-003 (Alvine Pharmaceuticals) 127ALV-003 is an oral, two-enzyme cocktail designed to degrade dietary gluten 127Alvine Pharmaceuticals initiated a Phase I proof-of-concept study in human volunteers and celiac disease patients 127Early-phase candidates 130Celiac disease vaccine (Nexpep) 130Celiac disease is well suited to a therapeutic peptide-based vaccine 130Nexpep aims to put a peptide-based vaccine into Phase I trials in H1 2009 130HLA class II antigen modulator (Artielle) 131PMC-100 series (FunZyme) 132Transglutaminase 2 inhibitors (Numerate) 133CHAPTER 8 BIBLIOGRAPHY 134Journal papers 134Websites 142Datamonitor reports 146APPENDIX 147Contributing experts 147Report methodology 147About Datamonitor 148About Datamonitor Healthcare 148About the Immunology & Inflammation analysis team 149Disclaimer 150List of Tables Table 1: Symptoms, manifestations and conditions associated with celiac disease 13Table 2: Budesonide response in patients with refractory celiac disease, 2007 26Table 3: Budesonide response in patients with refractory celiac disease according to subjects' characteristics, 2007 27Table 4: Estimated sales of budesonide in celiac disease in the US and four major EU markets, 2008 28Table 5: Range of prevalence of celiac disease in different populations, 2009 32Table 6: Estimated celiac disease population in the seven major markets, split by region, 2009 35Table 7: Prevalence of celiac disease in the US, 2009 35Table 8: Summary of serological testing for celiac disease in a non-at-risk population, US, 2003 37Table 9: Prevalence of celiac disease in Japan, 2009 39Table 10: Prevalence of celiac disease in France, 2009 40Table 11: Prevalence of celiac disease in Germany, 2009 41Table 12: Prevalence of celiac disease in Italy, 2009 42Table 13: Prevalence of celiac disease in Spain, 2009 44Table 14: Prevalence of celiac disease in the UK, 2009 45Table 15: Estimated celiac disease prevalence and population size in select regions outside the seven major markets, 2009 47Table 16: Sensitivity and specificity of serologic tests for celiac disease in adults and children 53Table 17: The modified Marsh classification 59Table 18: Prevalence of organic diseases in patients meeting symptom-based criteria for irritable bowel syndrome 63Table 19: Estimates of the prevalence of celiac disease among patients with irritable bowel syndrome 63Table 20: Proportion of diagnosed versus undiagnosed celiac disease patients in the seven major markets and Finland, 2009 69Table 21: Celiac disease drug pricing analogues and the cost per day ($) 93Table 22: Celiac disease patient population and market valuation model, 2009-19 98Table 23: R&D pipeline in celiac disease, 2009 112Table 24: AT-1001: Phase II clinical trial overview, 2009 119Table 25: AT-1001: Phase I clinical trial overview, 2009 120Table 26: CCX-282: Phase II clinical trial overview, 2009 125Table 27: ALV-003: Clinical trial overview, 2009 129List of Figures Figure 1: Interaction of gluten, with environmental, immune and genetic factors in celiac disease 9Figure 2: Illustration of the pathogenesis of celiac disease, 2008 11Figure 3: The celiac disease iceberg 15Figure 4: Reasons for recurrent symptoms in refractory celiac disease 19Figure 5: Factors that influence compliance to a gluten-free diet 21Figure 6: Treatment of type I and type II refractory celiac disease 24Figure 7: Design and outcome of the celiac disease prevalence study in Japan 38Figure 8: Range in the size of celiac disease population in Italy, 2009 42Figure 9: Overview of the design and findings of West et al.'s prevalence study in the UK, 2003 45Figure 10: Flowchart of celiac disease diagnosis, 2009 51Figure 11: Mucosal characteristics of celiac disease observed with capsule endoscopy 55Figure 12: Relationship between number of duodenal biopsies and confirmation of diagnosis of celiac disease 58Figure 13: Correlation between mucosal injury and the extent of malabsorption and symptoms in celiac disease 59Figure 14: Source of referrals to a specialist adult celiac disease clinic in a district hospital in South Wales, 2006 67Figure 15: Datamonitor's estimated diagnosis rates in the US, the five EU markets and Japan, 2009-19 71Figure 16: Procedure for performing the Biocard home test for celiac disease 74Figure 17: Overview of the unmet needs in celiac disease, 2009 79Figure 18: Segmentation of celiac disease patients according to response to gluten-free diet in seven major markets, 2009 89Figure 19: Penetration rates in the gluten-free diet non-responsive and responsive celiac disease populations, 2009-19 96Figure 20: Celiac disease seven major market value scenario matrix, 2019 102Figure 21: The celiac disease rating scale (CeDARS) 106Figure 22: Classification of companies involved in celiac disease product R&D, 2009 110Figure 23: Celiac disease treatment strategies, 2009 111Figure 24: Assessment of mechanism of action of drugs in development for celiac disease, 2009 113Figure 25: Mechanism of action of AT-1001 115Figure 26: Ad hoc analysis of LAMA ratio on day 21 versus day seven 122Figure 27: Artielle ImmunoTherapeutics's RTL technology 132
|