|
| |
The Overlooked Problem of
Drug-Receptor Desensitization
Drugs that activate receptors account for almost
one-half of all pharmaceuticals. Yet it is ironic that after more than half a
century and billions of dollars spent on basic research in the government,
academic and pharmaceutical labs, we still don't have a fundamental
understanding of how drugs activate their target receptors. One of the most
puzzling aspects of understanding how these drugs work is to also understand how
they deactivate these same receptors. Often a dose of a drug that activates one
person's receptors can deactivate another's. The technical name for this is
desensitization, which is also referred to as tachyphylaxis, down-regulation,
tolerance or fade.
Desensitization is an overlooked and important side effect of many commonly used
drugs and naturally occurring hormones. Desensitization may contribute to a
person's inability to tolerate medications including those for the heart, pain
or asthma. One reason desensitization has been overlooked is that there exists a
common belief that by taking smaller doses one can prevent drug desensitization.
Therefore the doctors and pharmaceutical companies suggest the smallest starting
doses for many drugs as the appropriate therapy. This isn't always true. Some
people are susceptible to small doses and will still experience receptor
desensitization. Rightly or wrongly, this practice creates a tightrope between a
therapeutic or desensitizing dose that patients and doctors must walk when
utilizing medications that desensitize their target receptors. This may affect
anywhere from thirty to fifty percent of all pharmaceuticals and be a fertile
area for drug development and improvement in the future.
Why haven't the major pharmaceutical companies or the FDA addressed these
issues? The answer to this question reflects back to the original statement that
we still don't know how drugs activate and deactivate their target receptors. A
general model that accurately accounts for receptor activation and
desensitization remains to be accepted by the scientific community. Meanwhile,
many large pharmaceutical companies face a significant, long-term threat to
their current blockbuster drug model. The slowing rate of New Chemical Entity (NCE)
introduction clearly demonstrates that a need exists for a better way to find
potential drugs. One of the reasons pharmaceutical companies haven't found many
NCEs is because they lack a fundamental understanding of how drugs work. They
are increasingly bogged down with cumbersome theoretical and molecular models
that provide little predictive power for finding new potential drugs.
One way to develop better drugs is to understand and prevent some of their
side-effects. Our drugs can be safer, but the FDA and consumer groups have to
goad pharmaceutical companies into more open and better scientific studies. The
public needs to be better educated about taking drugs - not only their potential
for good, but harm as well.
Since many of the drugs that activate receptors also deactivate them depending
upon the patient, patients need to know that this can happen. The FDA and the
pharmaceutical companies could do more in this regard. Studies that determine
the average type and amount of drugs to deliver should also determine when these
drugs begin to deactivate these receptors in their target patient population.
Currently this isn't done. The FDA could also require these studies to better
assess the therapeutic efficacy of NCEs as well as many of the current drugs on
the market. The FDA could also require further basic research to provide better
drugs with less serious side effects.
Through public education, the bureaucracy can gradually change so that those
responsible for safe and effective drugs can produce better pharmaceuticals. Bio
Balance is attempting to lead the way toward this future.
Richard Lanzara, Ph.D.
President
Bio Balance, Inc.
Bio Balance (
http://www.bio-balance.com/ ) is an early
stage drug development company that has developed the only tested method to
prevent drug desensitization at the receptor level. This phenomenon, also known
as down-regulation, tolerance or fade, occurs with a large number of very
commonly used drugs such as dobutamine for heart failure, isoproterenol for
shock or asthma, L-dopa for Parkinson’s Disease, and morphine for pain. Notably,
desensitization cannot be remedied by taking larger dosages. With more and more
drug, efficacy diminishes and the drug essentially stops working. By using a
patented approach, we create new, combination drug candidates that sustain the
therapeutic response with a better side-effects profile than the original drugs.
| |
|