Advertisement

Why were So Many Social Scientists Wrong about the Green Revolution? Learning from Bangladesh

19:44 EDT 14 Jul 2012 | GMO pundit

TABLE FROM New rice technologies and challenges for food security in Asia and the Pacific - M. Hossain  and Josephine H. Narciso http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/006/Y4751E/y4751e0r.htm
Abstract Most social scientists once took a negative view of the socio-economic consequences of the Green Revolution. Events have since proved them wrong. Using Bangladesh as an example, we offer three reasons why social scientists were mistaken. One is the focus on village studies at the expense of nationally representative surveys. Another is insufficient appreciation of the technical limits of the new rice technology. The third is a misleading model of agrarian change. The inability of village studies to validate generalisations, the reluctance to abandon the historical model of de-peasantisation, and opposing beliefs about how to evaluate socio-economic consequences created a Rashomon Effect that made the controversy hard to resolve.
Convictions are greater enemies of truth than lies. (Nietzsche)
Journal of Development Studies DOI:10.1080/00220388.2012.663905
Alastair Orr
Version of record first published: 05 Jul 2012

Debate over the Green Revolution – the spread of high-yielding varieties of rice and wheat –
once dominated writing on rural development... Initial optimism about ‘miracle seeds’ was short-lived (Brown, 1970). For the next 20 years, most social science writing about the consequences of the Green Revolution was critical (Farmer, 1977; Griffin, 1979; Pearse, 1980).
... Only in the late 1980s did some critics have second thoughts. Return visits showed that earlier fears were largely unjustified (Hazell and Ramaswamy, 1991). With the recantation by a prominent critic (Lipton with Longhurst, 1989), mainstream social science finally took a positive view of the Green Revolution.

Hazell, P.B.R. and Ramasamy, C. (1991) The Green Revolution Reconsidered: The Impact of High-Yielding Rice Varieties in South Asia (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).

Lipton, M. with Longhurst, R. (1989) New Seeds and Poor People (London: Unwin Hyman).


Wait, there's this in the citations:

Lipton, M. (2007) Plant breeding and poverty: can transgenic seeds replicate the ‘Green Revolution’ as a source of gains for the poor? Journal of Development Studies, 43(1), pp. 31–62.





Taylor & Francis Online :: Why were So Many Social Scientists Wrong about the Green Revolution? Learning from Bangladesh - Journal of Development Studies -:
Hat Tip: Giordano Masini ‏@LaValleDelSiele


Original Article: Why were So Many Social Scientists Wrong about the Green Revolution? Learning from Bangladesh

NEXT ARTICLE

More From BioPortfolio on "Why were So Many Social Scientists Wrong about the Green Revolution? Learning from Bangladesh"

Search BioPortfolio:
Advertisement
Advertisement