| |||||||
|
GM and non GM arable crops can co-exist in the EU without problems: says new research paper 14th
May 2004 PG Economics Ltd today announced the release of its latest research
paper on GM and non GM crop co-existence – Co-existence
of GM and non GM crops: the non GM and organic context in the EU
The key findings of the report are:
These
conclusions are based on the context of
the crops in which GM crops are being developed and the extent to which non GM
demand exists, the experiences of European arable farmers in successfully
implementing and managing the co-existence of specialist crops with other crops
for many years and practical, commercial experience of growing GM crops in North
America. If
highly onerous GM crop stewardship conditions are applied to all EU farmers who
might wish to grow GM crops, even though the vast majority of such crops would
not be located near to organic-equivalent crops or conventional crops for which
the non GM status is important, this would be disproportionate and inequitable.
In effect, conventional farmers, who account for 99.59% of the current,
relevant EU arable crop farming area could be discouraged from adopting a new
technology that is likely to deliver farm level benefits (yield gains, cost
savings) and provide wider environmental gains (reduced pesticide use, switches
to more environmentally benign herbicides, reduced levels of greenhouse gas
emissions). Market
for non GM products in the EU This
market (ie, where buyers actively request that supplies are certified as being
non GM) currently accounts for about 27% of total soybean/derivative use and 36%
of total maize use. For crops like
oilseed rape and sugar beet, there is no real GM versus non GM market in the EU
because, in the case of oilseed rape, no GM product is currently permitted for
planting or importing for use, and in the case of sugar beet, no GM sugar beet
crops are currently grown commercially anywhere in the world.
Organic
sector context The
share of EU crops planted to organic for which GM traits are currently
available, or are likely to become commercially available in the next five years
is extremely low (about 0.41%). This
very low level of importance reflects a combination
of reasons including adverse agronomic factors (eg, the nutrient demanding
nature of crops like oilseed rape), limited demand, and market preference for
competing (imported) produce (eg, cane sugar). Co-existence
of GM and non GM crops GM crops growing commercially in the EU and in North America have co-existed with conventional and organic crops without economic and commercial problems – only isolated instances have been reported of adventitious presence of GMOs occurring in organic crops, even in North America where GM crops dominate production of soybeans, maize and canola[1]. For the future, the likelihood of economic and commercial problems of co-existence arising remains very limited, even if a significant development of commercial GM crops and increased plantings of organic crops were to occur. Notes to editorsFor further details contact Graham Brookes Tel: +44 (0)1303 840958 or Peter Barfoot +44 (0) 1300 321501. Email: peter.barfoot@pgeconomics.co.uk or graham.brookes@pgeconomics.co.uk A pdf version of the paper is available on www.pgeconomics.co.uk [1] This relates to reports of adventitious presence of GM material occurring in organic crops that have resulted in economic losses for organic growers (eg, loss of organic price premium). It does not include instances where trace levels (within the boundaries of very sensitive testing equipment) of GM material may have been detected, but which did not result in any economic loss
|
|
| ||||||||