Microsurgical Repair of the Peripheral Trigeminal Nerve After Mandibular Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy.
Summary of "Microsurgical Repair of the Peripheral Trigeminal Nerve After Mandibular Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy."
Injuries to the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) and lingual nerves (LNs) have long been known complications of the mandibular sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO). Most postoperative paresthesias resolve without treatment. However, microsurgical exploration of the nerve may be indicated in cases of significant persistent sensory dysfunction associated with observed or suspected localized IAN or LN injury. We report the demographics and outcome of microsurgical exploration and repair of peripheral branches of the trigeminal nerve injured because of the SSRO. MATERIALS AND
A retrospective chart review was completed on all patients who had microsurgical repair of peripheral trigeminal nerve injuries caused by mandibular SSRO and were operated on by the senior author (R.A.M.) between March 1986 and December 2005. A physical examination, including standardized neurosensory testing (NST) as described by Zuniga et al, was completed on each patient preoperatively. All patients were followed periodically after surgery for at least 1 year with NST repeated at each visit. NST results obtained at the last patient visit were used to determine the final level of recovery of sensory function. Sensory recovery was evaluated using guidelines established by the Medical Research Council scale. The following data were collected and analyzed: age of patient, gender, nerve injured, chief sensory complaint (numbness, pain, or both), duration (months) from injury to surgical intervention, intraoperative findings, surgical procedure, and neurosensory status at final evaluation. Given the retrospective nature of this study, the research was exempt from our institutional review board ethics committee.
There were 54 (n = 54) patients (8 males and 46 females) with an average age of 36.9 years (range, 16 to 55 years) and a follow-up of at least 12 months. The most commonly injured/repaired nerve was the IAN (n = 39), followed by the LN (n = 14), and the long buccal nerve (n = 1). In 31 patients (57.4%), the chief sensory complaint was numbness, while 20 patients (37%) complained of pain and numbness, and 3 patients (5.5%) complained of pain without mention of numbness. The average time from nerve injury to repair was 9.4 months (range, 3 to 50 months). The most common intraoperative finding was a discontinuity defect (n = 18, 33.3%), followed by partial nerve severance (n = 15, 27.8%), neuroma-in-continuity (n = 11, 20.3%), and compression injury (n = 10, 18.5%). The most frequent surgical procedure was autogenous nerve graft reconstruction of the IAN using the sural or great auricular nerve (n = 22, 40.7%), followed by excision of a neuroma with or without neurorrhaphy (n = 13, 24.1%). All the LN injuries (n = 14) were partial or complete severances, of which 2 were reconstructed with autogenous nerve grafts and the other 12 underwent neurorrhaphy. The long buccal nerve injury required excision of a proximal stump neuroma without neurorrhaphy. After a minimum of 1-year follow-up, NST showed that 8 nerves (14.8%) showed no sign of recovery; 19 nerves (35.2%) had regained "useful sensory function," and 27 nerves (50%) showed full recovery as described by the Medical Research Council scale.
Microsurgical repair of the IAN or LN injured during the SSRO can be considered in patients with persistent, unacceptable sensory dysfunction in the distribution of the involved nerve. Modifications of surgical technique may be helpful in reducing the incidence of such injuries. Based on our experience, an algorithm for evaluation and treatment is presented.
Chair, Department Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Northside Hospital of Atlanta; Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery, Emory University; Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical College of Georgia;
This article was published in the following journal.
- PubMed Source: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20727645
- DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2010.05.065
The gold standard of peripheral nerve repair is nerve autograft when tensionless repair is not possible. Use of nerve autograft has several shortcomings, however. These include limited availability of...
A 7-year-old male entire West Highland white terrier was referred to the Small Animal Hospital at the University of Glasgow for bilateral, chronic, medically unresponsive otitis media and externa. A h...
Temporomandibular joint syndrome, or Costen syndrome, is a clinically diagnosed disorder whose most common symptoms include joint pain and clicking, difficulty opening the mouth, and temporomandibular...
End-to-side neurorrhaphy is a promising procedure for nerve repair in peripheral nerve injury. However, in previous studies, this technique was limited to somatic nerves. The present study was designe...
Using 11.7 T ultra high-field T2-weighted MRI, the present study aimed to investigate pathological changes of primary and secondary trigeminal pathways following neonatal transection of infraorbital n...
This study investigates a new therapy for epilepsy called Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation (TNS). TNS involves external electrical stimulation of sensory nerve located above the eyes and over ...
The radial and ulnar artery injuries related with the wrist cut are frequently encountered. There are many factors which are effective on the improvement of these arterial structures was r...
This study is a comparison of sensory recovery outcomes from the use of AVANCE and hollow tube conduits for peripheral nerve gap repairs in the hand.
The purpose of this study is to determine which surgical approach is better for clean transection injury in peripheral nerves in outcomes.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate histamine, CGRP and VIP levels in saliva as biological markers for activation of trigeminal and parasympathetic nerve fibers in various c...
Medical and Biotech [MESH] Definitions
Diseases of the trigeminal nerve or its nuclei, which are located in the pons and medulla. The nerve is composed of three divisions: ophthalmic, maxillary, and mandibular, which provide sensory innervation to structures of the face, sinuses, and portions of the cranial vault. The mandibular nerve also innervates muscles of mastication. Clinical features include loss of facial and intra-oral sensation and weakness of jaw closure. Common conditions affecting the nerve include brain stem ischemia, INFRATENTORIAL NEOPLASMS, and TRIGEMINAL NEURALGIA.
A sensory branch of the MANDIBULAR NERVE, which is part of the trigeminal (5th cranial) nerve. The lingual nerve carries general afferent fibers from the anterior two-thirds of the tongue, the floor of the mouth, and the mandibular gingivae.
The 5th and largest cranial nerve. The trigeminal nerve is a mixed motor and sensory nerve. The larger sensory part forms the ophthalmic, mandibular, and maxillary nerves which carry afferents sensitive to external or internal stimuli from the skin, muscles, and joints of the face and mouth and from the teeth. Most of these fibers originate from cells of the trigeminal ganglion and project to the trigeminal nucleus of the brain stem. The smaller motor part arises from the brain stem trigeminal motor nucleus and innervates the muscles of mastication.
A branch of the trigeminal (5th cranial) nerve. The mandibular nerve carries motor fibers to the muscles of mastication and sensory fibers to the teeth and gingivae, the face in the region of the mandible, and parts of the dura.
The semilunar-shaped ganglion containing the cells of origin of most of the sensory fibers of the trigeminal nerve. It is situated within the dural cleft on the cerebral surface of the petrous portion of the temporal bone and gives off the ophthalmic, maxillary, and part of the mandibular nerves.