Risk factors for revision due to infection after primary total hip arthroplasty.
Summary of "Risk factors for revision due to infection after primary total hip arthroplasty."
Background and purpose There has been a limited amount of research on risk factors for revision due to infection following total hip arthroplasty (THA), probably due to low absolute numbers of revisions. We therefore studied patient- and surgery-related risk factors for revision due to infection after primary THA in a population-based setting. Materials and methods Using the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Registry, we identified 80,756 primary THAs performed in Denmark between Jan 1, 1995 and Dec 31, 2008. We used Cox regression analysis to compute crude and adjusted relative risk (RR) of revision due to infection. Revision was defined as extraction or exchange of any component due to infection. The median follow-up time was 5 (0-14) years. Results 597 primary THAs (0.7%) were revised due to infection. Males, patients with any co-morbidity, patients operated due to non-traumatic avascular femoral head necrosis, and patients with long duration of surgery had an increased RR of revision due to infection within the total follow-up time. A tendency of increased RR of revision was found for patients who had received cemented THA without antibiotic and hybrid THA relative to patients with cementless implants. Hip diagnosis and fixation technique were not associated with risk of revision due to infection within 1 year of surgery (short-term risk). Interpretation We identified several categories of THA patients who had a higher risk of revision due to infection. Further research is required to explain the mechanism underlying this increased risk. More attention should be paid by clinicians to infection prevention strategies in patients with THA, particularly those with increased risk.
Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Århus.
This article was published in the following journal.
Name: Acta orthopaedica
- PubMed Source: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20860453
- DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2010.519908
Medical and Biotech [MESH] Definitions
The relating of causes to the effects they produce. Causes are termed necessary when they must always precede an effect and sufficient when they initiate or produce an effect. Any of several factors may be associated with the potential disease causation or outcome, including predisposing factors, enabling factors, precipitating factors, reinforcing factors, and risk factors.
Partial or total replacement of a joint.
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Finger
Partial or total replacement of one or more FINGERS, or a FINGER JOINT.
Confounding Factors (epidemiology)
Factors that can cause or prevent the outcome of interest, are not intermediate variables, and are not associated with the factor(s) under investigation. They give rise to situations in which the effects of two processes are not separated, or the contribution of causal factors cannot be separated, or the measure of the effect of exposure or risk is distorted because of its association with other factors influencing the outcome of the study.
Neoplasms, Second Primary
Abnormal growths of tissue that follow a previous neoplasm but are not metastases of the latter. The second neoplasm may have the same or different histological type and can occur in the same or different organs as the previous neoplasm but in all cases arises from an independent oncogenic event. The development of the second neoplasm may or may not be related to the treatment for the previous neoplasm since genetic risk or predisposing factors may actually be the cause.
Background and purpose The aim of the present study was to assess incidence of and risk factors for infection after hip arthroplasty in data from 3 national health registries. We investigated differen...
Context Total hip arthroplasty is a common surgical procedure but little is known about longitudinal trends. Objective To examine demographics and outcomes of patients undergoing primary and revision...
We describe an infection with Ureaplasma urealyticum causing rapid loosening of a cemented total hip arthroplasty. When reviewing the literature we found that no such case has been reported previously...
The objective of this study was to evaluate the survivorship of revision TKA and determine the reasons and predictors for failure. Between January 1999 to December 2005, 499 total knee arthroplasty re...
ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to assess natural microbial agents, history and risk factors for total joint arthroplasty (TJA) infections in patients receiving tumor necrosis...
Long term follow-up is needed to determine whether current Mobile Bearing revision Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) designs will improve implant longevity. The potential advantages of mobile...
The investigators hypothesise that cementless one-stage exchange revision surgery can be performed in patients with chronically infected hip replacement with substantial benefits for the p...
Metaphyseal sleeves, through their design, could allow reconstruction of the knee in cases of severe bone loss by allowing rigid internal fixation and proper alignment of the extremity and...
The primary focus of this study is to investigate whether increased bone density of the graft in revision arthroplasty of the hip can cause a decreased micromotion of the implant relative...
Transient cognitive changes after surgery may be due to many different factors. It is estimated that between 5-29% of patients undergoing orthopedic surgery experience a transient decline...