The Irrigation Or No Irrigation In Simple Lacerations Trials

2016-11-30 15:45:27 | BioPortfolio


The purpose of this study is to determine whether the irrigation or non-irrigation of a simple laceration treated in the emergency department has an effect on the subsequent rate of infection.


Background: Current guidelines recommend that lacerations be irrigated prior to their closure. However, there is very little data in the literature suggesting that simple laceration irrigation diminishes the subsequent rate of infection. Do patients benefit from this practice that involves additional time and costs?

Hypothesis Testing & Procedure: The purpose of this double-blind randomized controlled non-inferiority study is to test the hypothesis that the non-irrigation of lacerations does not increase the rate of post-repair infection. Every adult patients presenting to the Chicoutimi's Hospital Emergency Department with a simple laceration will be identify by the triage nurse. Eligibility will subsequently be assessed by the emergency room physician according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Eligible and consenting patients will be randomized to either the irrigation or non-irrigation arm. Post-repair rate of infection and aesthetic appearance satisfaction will be reported.

Sample Size Determination: With the fairly liberal inclusion criteria, a 6% wound infection rate in the irrigation group is expected, which corresponds to the upper limit of the 2 to 6% range reported in the literature. Non-inferiority of non-irrigation would be accepted if the rate of infection in this group does not exceed by 4% the usual infection rate of 6% with irrigation, as previously stated. As such, for the study to be powered at 80% with a 95% one-sided confidence interval, a population of 874 patients would be needed to conclude that the non-irrigation is non-inferior when its infection rate does not exceed by more than 4% the infection rate of the irrigation group. In addition, to account for an attrition rate of approximately 10%, enrolment of 1000 patients is aimed.

Statistical Analysis: Statistical analysis will be done by a certified statistician. According to the distribution of our data, the Chi2 or the Fisher test will be used. A preliminary analysis of our data will be done in the Spring 2017 to assess safety of our intervention.

Plan for Missing Data: Patients that are lost at follow up will be considered as having had no infection if no record of subsequent visits for wound infection is found after consultation of the regional Electronic Medical Record.

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Prevention


Laceration - Injury


Irrigation, No irrigation


CIUSSS Saguenay-Lac-St-Jean, Hôpital de Chicoutimi


Not yet recruiting


Université de Sherbrooke

Results (where available)

View Results


Published on BioPortfolio: 2016-11-30T15:45:27-0500

Clinical Trials [675 Associated Clinical Trials listed on BioPortfolio]

Irrigation Versus No Irrigation for Perforated Appendicitis

The purpose is to quantify the effect of irrigation during laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis.

Dilute Povidone-iodine Irrigation vs No Irrigation for Children With Acute, Perforated Appendicitis

The goal of this study is to compare the efficacy of PVI irrigation to no irrigation for decreasing postoperative intra-abdominal abscesses in children with perforated appendicitis. Additi...

Effect of Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation on the Reduction of Bacteria and Endotoxins in Root Canals

The purpose of this clinical study was to compare the effectiveness of passive ultrasonic irrigation with that of traditional syringe irrigation on the removal of bacteria and endotoxin (l...

Effect of Prontosan Wound Irrigation Solution on Venous Ulcers

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Prontosan® Wound Irrigation Solution in the treatment of hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers compared to wound irrigation with saline solutio...

Irrigation Versus Suction in Complicated Acute Appendicitis

This study evaluates the intraabdominal abscess rate after laparoscopic appendectomy in complicated acute appendicitis performing irrigation of the abdominal cavity or only suction without...

PubMed Articles [5046 Associated PubMed Articles listed on BioPortfolio]

Effect of Laser Energy and Tip Insertion Depth on the Pressure Generated Outside the Apical Foramen During Er:YAG Laser-Activated Root Canal Irrigation.

The risk of extrusion of irritative irrigants into the extraradicular tissue should be minimized during root canal irrigation. This study aimed to examine the pressure generated outside the apex durin...

Comparison of Irrigation Times Using Gravity and High-Pressure Lavage.

The benefits of high-pressure pulsatile lavage for open fracture irrigation have been controversial based on conflicting experimental animal research. Recently published data definitively demonstrated...

Stability of a novel corticosteroid nasal irrigation solution: betamethasone 17-valerate added to extemporaneously prepared nasal irrigation solutions.

There are no commercially available nasal irrigation solutions containing corticosteroids. Instead, such preparations are extemporaneously prepared by adding existing corticosteroid formulations to na...

Removal of calcium hydroxide from Weine Type II systems using photon-induced photoacoustic streaming, passive ultrasonic, and needle irrigation: a microcomputed tomography study.

This study compared the effectiveness of Er:YAG laser-activated irrigation (PIPS), passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) with EndoUltra and standard needle irrigation (SNI) in the removal of calcium hyd...

The comparative effectiveness and safety of three activated irrigation techniques in the isthmus area using a transparent tooth model.

To compare the effectiveness and safety of three activated irrigation techniques when removing pulp tissue from the isthmus of a transparent tooth model. The three techniques assessed were: the EndoVa...

Medical and Biotech [MESH] Definitions

The washing of a body cavity or surface by flowing solution which is inserted and then removed. Any drug in the irrigation solution may be absorbed.

Irrigation of the nose with saline or irrigation solutions for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes. It is used to remove irritants, allergens, or microorganisms from the nose.

The washing of a body cavity or surface by flowing water or solution for therapy or diagnosis.

The routing of water to open or closed areas where it is used for agricultural purposes.

Local antibacterial that probably acts by releasing formaldehyde in aqueous solutions. It is used for irrigation of infected body cavities - bladder, peritoneum, etc. and as a spray for burns.

More From BioPortfolio on "The Irrigation Or No Irrigation In Simple Lacerations Trials"

Quick Search

Searches Linking to this Trial