VENICE Study Nevirapine Full Dose/Dose Escalation
This study aims to compare the trough plasma concentrations of nevirapine after 7 days of treatment at the full dose from baseline with dose escalation in patients taking efavirenz who switch to nevirapine due to neuropsychiatric adverse reactions.
The prognosis for HIV infection changed radically after 1996 thanks to the arrival of protease inhibitors (PI), which, when combined with 2 nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) formed the so-called highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). HAART led to a considerable decrease in the incidence and mortality of opportunistic infections and made HIV infection a chronic condition and not necessarily the progressive, irreversible, and fatal disease it was before 1996. The initial euphoria led people to believe that HAART could cure the disease, but it was soon clear that eradication of the virus was impossible and that treatment would have to be continued indefinitely. Chronic treatment became more difficult because of the frequent onset of adverse events or extremely complex regimens with a high pill burden that had to be administered several times per day, often with dietary restrictions.1,2 In this context, adherence was difficult, efficacy was far from optimal, and the patient's quality of life was noticeably reduced. The subsequent appearance of non-nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI)—nevirapine and efavirenz—considerably improved some of the disadvantages of PIs. Today, the combination of 2 NRTIs and an NNRTI is considered the regimen of choice when starting antiretroviral therapy. Efavirenz is considered the gold standard for initial antiretroviral therapy and is widely used in clinical practice.
More than half of the patients who start treatment with efavirenz present adverse effects, although these are generally well tolerated and decrease with time. Approximately 3%-8% of patients have to suspend efavirenz due to adverse effects, which are mainly neuropsychiatric. In these cases, efavirenz is usually replaced by nevirapine.
Nevirapine is a substrate and potent inducer of the hepatic cytochrome P450 enzyme system (CYP3A4 and others) and continuous administration leads to progressive autoinduction of its own metabolism. The recommended dose is 200 mg every 12 hours. If this dose is administered from the start of treatment, the plasma concentrations reached during the first few days are much higher than those reached later. Therefore, and because the toxicity of nevirapine is associated with its plasma concentrations, the recommended initial dose is 200 mg/d for the first 14 days followed by 200 mg every 12 hours indefinitely. There are no specific recommendations on dosage when nevirapine replaces efavirenz; therefore, it is administered at increasing doses according to the summary of product characteristics.
Efavirenz is also a potent inducer of CYP3A4 and increases the metabolism of other drugs that use this metabolic pathway. Enzyme induction is by increased synthesis of the enzymes involved, with the result that, when the inducer is suspended, the enzyme induction effect persists for a few days until the excess enzymes are catabolized. Furthermore, the half-life of efavirenz is very long. Consequently, the plasma concentrations fall progressively for more than a week after the drug is withdrawn. Therefore, when efavirenz is replaced by nevirapine, the residual enzyme induction that persists might lead to a fall in the plasma concentrations of nevirapine. Given that NNRTIs have a low genetic barrier for the development of resistance, the fall in plasma concentrations of nevirapine for the 14 days during which it is administered at 200 mg/d can generate resistance mutations and virologic failure.
When efavirenz is switched for nevirapine, it is unknown whether nevirapine should be started at increasing standard doses (200 mg/d for the first 14 days plus 200 mg bid thereafter) or at the full dose (200 mg every 12 hours) as a consequence of the enzyme induction caused by efavirenz.
Currently available data do not enable us to make a recommendation on the dose with which treatment with nevirapine can be started in patients who required efavirenz to be withdrawn and for whom nevirapine was chosen as an alternative. Nevertheless, despite small sample sizes, preliminary studies suggest that this strategy could be effective and safe. Therefore, randomized clinical trials that enable us to evaluate this strategy appropriately are necessary
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label
Hospital General de Elche
Clinical Trial Agency of HIV Study Group
Results (where available)
- Source: http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00704249
- Information obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov on July 15, 2010
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of 400 mg QD nevirapine extended release (NVP XR) formulation versus 200 mg BID nevirapine immediate release (NVP IR) in ARV...
The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate the efficacy of nevirapine extended release (NVP XR) based regimen for HIV-1 infected patients who were receiving nevirapine immediate...
Open-Label, multiple-dose, drug interaction study to assess the effect of nevirapine on the pharmacokinetics of atazanavir in HIV-infected individuals.
Primary: To evaluate the rate of development of resistance to nevirapine in HIV-1 infected individuals. To evaluate safety of nevirapine in HIV-1 infected individuals with CD4 counts great...
PRIMARY: To compare the effect of nevirapine versus placebo alone or in combination with zidovudine (AZT) on CD4 T-cell count and percentage after 3 and 6 months of treatment. To evaluate ...
This prospective, open-label, non-randomized controlled trial evaluated the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of substituting nevirapine/emtricitabine/tenofovir for rilpivirine/emtricitabine/tenof...
Antiretroviral therapy related dyslipidemia increases the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and is less frequently observed with nevirapine. Whether substituting rilpivirine for nevirapine has dysl...
Health concerns for HIV-infected persons on antiretroviral therapy (ART) have moved from morbidity to the challenges of long-term ART. We investigated the effect of Zidovudine or Nevirapine on reprodu...
Efavirenz and nevirapine failure is associated with a rapid selection of resistance-associated mutations (RAMs), which may impact on etravirine or rilpivirine susceptibility. However, RAMs for rilpivi...
Medical and Biotech [MESH] Definitions
A potent, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor used in combination with nucleoside analogues for treatment of HIV infection and AIDS.
Inflammation of brain parenchymal tissue as a result of viral infection. Encephalitis may occur as primary or secondary manifestation of TOGAVIRIDAE INFECTIONS; HERPESVIRIDAE INFECTIONS; ADENOVIRIDAE INFECTIONS; FLAVIVIRIDAE INFECTIONS; BUNYAVIRIDAE INFECTIONS; PICORNAVIRIDAE INFECTIONS; PARAMYXOVIRIDAE INFECTIONS; ORTHOMYXOVIRIDAE INFECTIONS; RETROVIRIDAE INFECTIONS; and ARENAVIRIDAE INFECTIONS.
Viral infections of the leptomeninges and subarachnoid space. TOGAVIRIDAE INFECTIONS; FLAVIVIRIDAE INFECTIONS; RUBELLA; BUNYAVIRIDAE INFECTIONS; ORBIVIRUS infections; PICORNAVIRIDAE INFECTIONS; ORTHOMYXOVIRIDAE INFECTIONS; RHABDOVIRIDAE INFECTIONS; ARENAVIRIDAE INFECTIONS; HERPESVIRIDAE INFECTIONS; ADENOVIRIDAE INFECTIONS; JC VIRUS infections; and RETROVIRIDAE INFECTIONS may cause this form of meningitis. Clinical manifestations include fever, headache, neck pain, vomiting, PHOTOPHOBIA, and signs of meningeal irritation. (From Joynt, Clinical Neurology, 1996, Ch26, pp1-3)
Infections with viruses of the family PARAMYXOVIRIDAE. This includes MORBILLIVIRUS INFECTIONS; RESPIROVIRUS INFECTIONS; PNEUMOVIRUS INFECTIONS; HENIPAVIRUS INFECTIONS; AVULAVIRUS INFECTIONS; and RUBULAVIRUS INFECTIONS.
Pathogenic infections of the brain, spinal cord, and meninges. DNA VIRUS INFECTIONS; RNA VIRUS INFECTIONS; BACTERIAL INFECTIONS; MYCOPLASMA INFECTIONS; SPIROCHAETALES INFECTIONS; fungal infections; PROTOZOAN INFECTIONS; HELMINTHIASIS; and PRION DISEASES may involve the central nervous system as a primary or secondary process.