Patterned Electrical Neuromuscular Stimulation and Therapeutic Exercise for Osteoarthritis of the Knee: Pilot Study

Summary

The purpose of the study is to investigate the benefits of the Patterned Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (PENS) for the treatment of osteoarthritis. The rationale for this investigation is to assess the benefit of PENS in the alleviation of symptoms of osteoarthritis and elucidating the mechanism of action of PENS.

Description

There will be two study conditions; patients will be assigned to PENS treatment or to the control group.

Study arm 1 - 15 Patients (may be expanded) will receive stimulation with the following parameters:

- 20-minute session, to each affected knee, 3 times per week for 12 weeks.

- PENS for 20 minutes:

- Tri-phasic Lower Extremity stimulation pattern based on activation timing of the quadriceps and hamstrings for strength training (50 Hz impulses for 200 ms every 1500 ms).

- Minimal twitch for 5 minutes.

- Moderate to strong, but well-tolerated twitch contractions for 15 minutes.

- Electrodes placed on quadriceps and hamstrings.

Study arm 2 - 5 Patients (may be expanded) will receive stimulation with the following parameters:

- 20-minute session, to each affected knee, 3 times per week for 12 weeks.

- Placebo PENS for 20 minutes:

- Electrodes placed on quadriceps and hamstrings.

A previous study was performed by the principal investigator to compare treatment of knee osteoarthritis with exercise vs a control group. The data from that study will be used to historically compare exercise with PENS treatment.

Primary Endpoints The following endpoints will be evaluated (between and within groups): Change in WOMAC osteoarthritis-specific status from baseline to end of treatment phase (12 weeks); Change in VAS.

Secondary Endpoints The following endpoints will be evaluated: Change in biochemical Synovial Fluid markers from baseline to end of treatment phase (12 weeks); MRI Data; Muscle strength; Change in pressure algometry of the knee joint; Change in patient self-reported and physician-reported global assessment from baseline to end of treatment (12 weeks); Change in pain intensity from baseline through the end of treatment phase (12 weeks); Change in physical function indices from baseline to end of treatment phase (12 weeks); Number of patients reporting 20% or more improvement in pain intensity; Number of patients recording 20% or more improvement in self-reported osteoarthritis overall questionnaire score; Number of patients indicating 20% or more improvement in self-reported and in physician-reported global assessment score.

Other Observations The following will also be monitored: Changes in prescription and over-the-counter medication usage (type used and amount taken); Adherence to treatment protocol (data from clinical treatment records); Safety of electrical stimulation and knee aspiration.

Primary Outcomes: Primary outcomes for this study is osteoarthritis-specific functioning, (WOMAC).

Osteoarthritis-specific functioning will be evaluated with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index version 3.1 (WOMAC 3.1). The WOMAC 3.1 is a 24-item patient self-reported questionnaire assessing pain, stiffness, and physical function disability. The WOMAC is available in a Japanese version.

Pain intensity will be measured using a 10-centimeter visual analog scale (VAS scale). The scale will be anchored at one end with "0" and labeled "no pain at all," and at the other "10" and labeled "worst pain possible."

Secondary Outcomes: Secondary outcomes for this study are pain intensity, global assessment of function, physical functioning and safety.

Biochemical markers in knee joint fluid will be evaluated for change related to electrical stimulation. Synovial fluid will be aspirated, at baseline and after 12 weeks of electrical stimulation, from the osteoarthritic knee receiving stimulation. Fluid volume and acidity (i.e., pH), chondroitin 6-sulfate and chondroitin 4-sulfate concentrations, and hyaluronan (concentration, molecular weight and viscosity) will be assessed. Chondroitin sulfate isomers will be evaluated using high performance liquid chromatography. Hyaluronan viscosity will be determined using a capillary viscometer, molecular weight determined from viscosity, and concentration by protein assay.

MRI will be taken to evaluate the volume of the muscle group, thickness of the cartilage, and glucosaminoglycan content

Global assessment of function will be addressed with a single question; one for the patient and one for the treating physician. On a 10 cm visual analogue scale the following or similarly worded question will be rated: Considering all the ways OA has impacted your life {your patient's life} in the last month, how would you rate your {your patient's} condition today? The scale will be anchored at one end with "0" and the label "very poor," and at the other end with "10" and the label "very good."

Physical performance (objectively measured data) will be assessed using a timed up-and-go test. Quadriceps strength will be evaluated using a mechanical dynamometer.

Muscle strength should be conducted prior to the other physical performance measures to reduce bias due to fatigue. Responses to all questionnaires should be obtained prior to physical measurements, and then the physician should aspirate the treated knee.

Prescription medication regimen for the patients will be reported by the physician or study coordinator. The patient will report over-the-counter medication use.

Patient adherence to the stimulation protocol will be monitored through the clinical record.

Safety of electrostimulation and of the fluid aspiration procedure will be monitored via adverse events reports from the physician or study coordinator. Serious adverse events (i.e., fatal, life threatening, needing hospitalization) are not anticipated for electrostimulation or for aspiration of the knee. Anticipated adverse events for electrostimulation are minor (e.g., skin irritation), while for knee aspiration adverse events may include knee pain, swelling, stiffness, vasovagal or syncopal reaction.

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Control: Placebo Control, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Single Blind (Subject), Primary Purpose: Treatment

Conditions

Knee Osteoarthritis

Intervention

Patterned Electrical Neuromuscular Stimulation, Placebo PENS

Location

Osaka General Medical Center
Osaka
Japan

Status

Recruiting

Source

RS Medical

Results (where available)

View Results

Links

• Source: http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00701506
• Information obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov on July 15, 2010

More From BioPortfolio on "Patterned Electrical Neuromuscular Stimulation and Therapeutic Exercise for Osteoarthritis of the Knee: Pilot Study"

• Related Companies
• Related Events
• Related Clinical Trials
• Related PubMed Entries
• Related Medications