Advertisement

Topics

These highlights do not include all the information needed to use GEMCITABINE FOR INJECTION safely and effectively. See full prescribing information for GEMCITABINE FOR INJECTION .  GEMCITABINE for injection, for intravenous use Initial U.S. Approval: 19 | gemcitabine hydrochloride [Actavis Pharma, Inc.] | BioPortfolio

13:51 EST 27th January 2019 | BioPortfolio

Note: While we endeavour to keep our records up-to-date one should not rely on these details being accurate without first consulting a professional. Click here to read our full medical disclaimer.

Gemcitabine for injection in combination with carboplatin is indicated for the treatment of patients with advanced ovarian cancer that has relapsed at least 6 months after completion of platinum-based therapy.

Gemcitabine for injection in combination with paclitaxel is indicated for the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer after failure of prior anthracycline-containing adjuvant chemotherapy, unless anthracyclines were clinically contraindicated.

Gemcitabine for injection in combination with cisplatin is indicated for the first-line treatment of patients with inoperable, locally advanced (Stage IIIA or IIIB) or metastatic (Stage IV) non-small cell lung cancer.

Gemcitabine for injection is indicated as first-line treatment for patients with locally advanced (nonresectable Stage II or Stage III) or metastatic (Stage IV) adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Gemcitabine for injection is indicated for patients previously treated with fluorouracil

Recommended Dose and Schedule

The recommended dosage of gemcitabine for injection is 1000 mg/m intravenously over 30 minutes on Days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle in combination with carboplatin AUC 4 administered intravenously on Day 1 after gemcitabine for injection administration. Refer to carboplatin prescribing information for additional information.

Dosage Modifications

Recommended gemcitabine for injection dosage modifications for myelosuppression are described in Tables 1 and 2 [see Warnings and Precautions (5.2)]. Refer to the recommended dosage modifications for non-hematologic adverse reactions [see Dosage and Administration (2.5)].     

Table 1: Recommended Dosage Modifications for Gemcitabine for Injection for Myelosuppression on Day of Treatment in Ovarian Cancer
Treatment Day Absolute Neutrophil Count
(x 106/L)
Platelet Count
(x 106/L) 
Dosage Modification



Day 1 Greater than or equal to 1500 and Greater than or equal to 100,000 None
Less than 1500 or Less than 100,000 Delay Treatment Cycle
Day 8 Greater than or equal to 1500 and Greater than or equal to 100,000 None
1000 to 1499 or 75,000 to 99,999 50% of full dose
Less than 1000 or Less than 75,000 Hold
Table 2: Recommended Dosage Modifications for Gemcitabine for Injection for Myelosuppression in Previous Cycle in Ovarian Cancer
Occurrence Myelosuppression During Treatment Cycle Dose Modification
Initial Occurrence Absolute granulocyte count less than 500 x 106/L for more than 5 days Absolute granulocyte count less than 100 x 106/L for more than 3 days Febrile neutropenia Platelets less than 25,000x106/L Cycle delay of more than one week due to toxicity Permanently reduce Gemcitabine for injection to 800 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 8
Subsequent Occurrence If any of the above toxicities occur after the initial dose reduction Permanently reduce Gemcitabine for injection dose to 800 mg/m2 on Day 1 only

Recommended Dose and Schedule

The recommended dosage of gemcitabine for injection is 1250 mg/m intravenously over 30 minutes on Days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle in combination with paclitaxel 175 mg/m administered as a 3-hour intravenous infusion on Day 1 before gemcitabine for injection administration. Refer to paclitaxel prescribing information for additional information.

Dosage Modifications

Recommended gemcitabine for injection dosage modifications for myelosuppression are described in Table 3 [see Warnings and Precautions (5.2)]. Refer to the recommended dosage modifications for non-hematologic adverse reactions [see Dosage and Administration (2.5)].

Table 3: Recommended Dosage Modifications for Gemcitabine for Injection for Myelosuppression on Day of Treatment in Breast Cancer
Treatment Day Absolute Neutrophil Count  (x 106/L) Platelet Count (x 106/L) Dosage Modification
 

Day 1 Greater than or equal to 1500 and Greater than or equal to 100,000 None
  Less than 1500 or Less than 100,000 Hold
Day 8 Greater than or equal to 1200 and Greater than 75,000 None
1000 to 1199 or 50,000 to 75,000 75% of full dose
700 to 999 and Greater than or equal to 50,000 50% of full dose
Less than 700 or Less than 50,000 Hold

Recommended Dose and Schedule

28-day schedule

The recommended dosage of gemcitabine for injection is 1000 mg/m intravenously over 30 minutes on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle in combination with cisplatin 100 mg/m administered intravenously on Day 1 after gemcitabine for injection administration.

21-day schedule

The recommended dosage of gemcitabine for injection is 1250 mg/m intravenously over 30 minutes on Days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle in combination with cisplatin 100 mg/m administered intravenously on Day 1 after gemcitabine for injection administration.

Refer to cisplatin prescribing information for additional information.

Dosage Modifications

Recommended dosage modifications for gemcitabine for injection myelosuppression are described in Table 4 [see Warnings and Precautions (5.2)]. Refer to the recommended dosage modifications for non-hematologic adverse reactions [see Dosage and Administration (2.5)].

Recommended Dose and Schedule

The recommended dosage of gemcitabine for injection is 1000 mg/m intravenously over 30 minutes. The recommended treatment schedule is as follows:

Dosage Modifications

Recommended dosage modifications for gemcitabine for injection for myelosuppression are described in Table 4 [see Warnings and Precautions (5.2)]. Refer to the recommended dosage modifications for non-hematologic adverse reactions [see Dosage and Administration (2.5)].

Table 4: Recommended Dosage Modifications for Gemcitabine for Injection for Myelosuppression in Pancreatic Cancer and Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
   Absolute Neutrophil Count
(x 106/L)
      Platelet Count
(x 106/L)
   Dosage Modification
          
  Greater than or equal to 1000   and   Greater than or equal to 100,000   None
  500 to 999   or   50,000 to 99,999   75% of full dose
  Less than 500   or   Less than 50,000   Hold

Permanently discontinue gemcitabine for injection for any of the following:

Withhold gemcitabine for injection or reduce dose by 50% for other Grade 3 or 4 non-hematological adverse reactions until resolved. No dose modifications are recommended for alopecia, nausea, or vomiting.

For injection: 200 mg, 1 g, or 2 g as sterile white to off-white lyophilized powder in single-dose vials for reconstitution.

Gemcitabine for injection is contraindicated in patients with a known hypersensitivity to gemcitabine. Reactions include anaphylaxis [see Adverse Reactions (6.1)].

In clinical trials evaluating the maximum tolerated dose of gemcitabine for injection, prolongation of the infusion time beyond 60 minutes or more frequent than weekly dosing resulted in an increased incidence of clinically significant hypotension, severe flu-like symptoms, myelosuppression, and asthenia. The half-life of gemcitabine for injection is influenced by the length of the infusion [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)]. Refer to the recommended gemcitabine for injection dosage [see Dosage and Administration (2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4)].

Myelosuppression manifested by neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia occurs with gemcitabine for injection as a single agent and the risks are increased when gemcitabine for injection is combined with other cytotoxic drugs. In clinical trials, Grade 3-4 neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia occurred in 25%, 8%, and 5%, respectively of the 979 patients who received single-agent gemcitabine for injection. The frequencies of Grade 3-4 neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia varied from 48% to 71%, 8% to 28%, and 5% to 55%, respectively, in patients receiving gemcitabine for injection in combination with another drug [see Adverse Reactions (6.1)].

Prior to each dose of gemcitabine for injection, obtain a complete blood count (CBC) with a differential and a platelet count. Modify the dosage as recommended [see Dosage and Administration (2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4)].

Pulmonary toxicity, including interstitial pneumonitis, pulmonary fibrosis, pulmonary edema, and adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), has been reported. In some cases, these pulmonary events can lead to fatal respiratory failure despite the discontinuation of therapy. The onset of pulmonary symptoms may occur up to 2 weeks after the last dose of gemcitabine for injection [see Adverse Reactions (6.1, 6.2)].

Permanently discontinue gemcitabine for injection in patients who develop unexplained dyspnea, with or without bronchospasm, or evidence of severe pulmonary toxicity.

Hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS), including fatalities from renal failure or the requirement for dialysis, can occur with gemcitabine for injection. In clinical trials, HUS occurred in 0.25% of 2429 patients. Most fatal cases of renal failure were due to HUS [see Adverse Reactions (6.1)].

Assess renal function prior to initiation of gemcitabine for injection and periodically during treatment. Consider the diagnosis of HUS in patients who develop anemia with evidence of microangiopathic hemolysis; increased bilirubin or LDH; reticulocytosis; severe thrombocytopenia; or renal failure (increased serum creatinine or BUN). Permanently discontinue gemcitabine for injection in patients with HUS or severe renal impairment. Renal failure may not be reversible even with the discontinuation of therapy.

Drug-induced liver injury, including liver failure and death, has been reported in patients receiving gemcitabine for injection alone or with other potentially hepatotoxic drugs [see Adverse Reactions (6.1, 6.2)]. Administration of gemcitabine for injection in patients with concurrent liver metastases or a pre-existing medical history or hepatitis, alcoholism, or liver cirrhosis can lead to exacerbation of the underlying hepatic insufficiency. Assess hepatic function prior to initiation of gemcitabine for injection and periodically during treatment. Permanently discontinue gemcitabine for injection in patients who develop severe hepatic toxicity.

Based on animal data and its mechanism of action, gemcitabine for injection can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. Gemcitabine was teratogenic, embryotoxic, and fetotoxic in mice and rabbits.

Advise women of the potential risk to a fetus. Advise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with gemcitabine for injection and for 6 months after the final dose. Advise male patients with female partners of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with gemcitabine for injection and for 3 months following the final dose [see Use in Specific Populations (8.1, 8.3)].

Gemcitabine for injection is not recommended for use in combination with radiation therapy.

Concurrent (given together or ≤7 days apart)

Life-threatening mucositis, especially esophagitis and pneumonitis occurred in a trial in which gemcitabine for injection was administered at a dose of 1000 mg/mto patients with non-small cell lung cancer for up to 6 consecutive weeks concurrently with thoracic radiation.

Non-concurrent (given >7 days apart)

Excessive toxicity has not been observed when gemcitabine for injection is administered more than 7 days before or after radiation. Radiation recall has been reported in patients who receive gemcitabine for injection after prior radiation.

Capillary leak syndrome (CLS) with severe consequences has been reported in patients receiving gemcitabine for injection as a single agent or in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents [see Adverse Reactions (6.2)]. Permanently discontinue gemcitabine for injection if CLS develops during therapy.

Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) has been reported in patients receiving gemcitabine for injection as a single agent or in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents [see Adverse Reactions (6.2)]. PRES can present with headache, seizure, lethargy, hypertension, confusion, blindness, and other visual and neurologic disturbances. Confirm the diagnosis of PRES with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Permanently discontinue gemcitabine for injection if PRES develops during therapy.

The following serious adverse reactions are discussed in greater detail in another section of the label

Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in the clinical trials of a drug cannot be directly compared to rates in the clinical trials of another drug and may not reflect the rates observed in practice.

Single Agent

The data described below reflect exposure to gemcitabine for injection as a single agent administered at doses between 800 mg/m to 1250 mg/m intravenously over 30 minutes once weekly in 979 patients with various malignancies. The most common (≥20%) adverse reactions of single agent gemcitabine for injection are nausea/vomiting, anemia, increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT), increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST), neutropenia, increased alkaline phosphatase, proteinuria, fever, hematuria, rash, thrombocytopenia, dyspnea, and edema. The most common (≥5%) Grade 3 or 4 adverse reactions were neutropenia, nausea/vomiting, increased ALT, increased alkaline phosphatase, anemia, increased AST, and thrombocytopenia. Approximately 10% of the 979 patients discontinued gemcitabine for injection due to adverse reactions. Adverse reactions resulting in discontinuation of gemcitabine for injection in 2% of 979 patients were cardiovascular adverse events (myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, arrhythmia, and hypertension) and adverse reactions resulting in discontinuation of gemcitabine for injection in <1% of 979 patients were anemia, thrombocytopenia, hepatic dysfunction, renal dysfunction, nausea/vomiting, fever, rash, dyspnea, hemorrhage, infection, stomatitis, somnolence, flu-like syndrome, and edema. 

Tables 5 and 6 present the incidence of selected adverse reactions and laboratory abnormalities reported in patients with various malignancies receiving single agent gemcitabine for injection across 5 clinical trials. Additional clinically significant adverse reactions are provided following Table 6.

Table 5: Selected Adverse Reactions Occurring in ≥10% of Patients Receiving Single Agent Gemcitabine for Injection

Grade based on criteria from the World Health Organization (WHO).

For approximately 60% of patients, non-laboratory adverse events were graded only if assessed to be possibly drug-related.

N=699-974; all patients with laboratory or non-laboratory data.

Table 6: Selected Laboratory Abnormalities Occurring in Patients Receiving Single Agent Gemcitabine for Injection

Grade based on criteria from the World Health Organization (WHO).

Regardless of causality.

N=699-974; all patients with laboratory or non-laboratory data.

Additional adverse reactions include the following:

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Tables 7 and 8 presents the incidence of selected adverse reactions and laboratory abnormalities occurring in ≥10% of gemcitabine for injection-treated patients and at a higher incidence in the gemcitabine for injection with cisplatin arm, reported in a randomized trial (Study 3) of gemcitabine for injection with cisplatin (n=260) administered in 28-day cycles as compared to cisplatin alone (n=262) in patients receiving first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [see Clinical Studies (14.3)].

Patients randomized to gemcitabine for injection with cisplatin received a median of 4 cycles of treatment and those randomized to cisplatin alone received a median of 2 cycles of treatment. In this trial, the requirement for dose adjustments (>90% versus 16%), discontinuation of treatment for adverse reactions (15% versus 8%), and the proportion of patients hospitalized (36% versus 23%) were all higher for patients receiving gemcitabine for injection with cisplatin compared to those receiving cisplatin alone. The incidence of febrile neutropenia (3% versus <1%), sepsis (4% versus 1%), Grade 3 cardiac dysrhythmias (3% versus <1%) were all higher in the gemcitabine for injection with cisplatin arm compared to the cisplatin alone arm. The two-drug combination was more myelosuppressive with 4 (1.5%) possibly treatment-related deaths, including 3 resulting from myelosuppression with infection and one case of renal failure associated with pancytopenia and infection. No deaths due to treatment were reported on the cisplatin arm.

Table 7: Selected Adverse Reactions Occurring in ≥10% of Patients Receiving Gemcitabine with Cisplatin and at Higher Incidence than in Patients Receiving Single Agent Cisplatin [Between Arm Difference of ≥5% (All Grades) or ≥2% (Grades 3-4)] in Study 3

Table 8: Selected Laboratory Abnormalities Occurring in >10% of Patients Receiving Gemcitabine with Cisplatin and at Higher Incidence than in Patients Receiving Single Agent Cisplatin [Between Arm Difference of ≥5% (All Grades) or ≥2% (Grades 3-4)] in Study 3

Tables 9 and 10 present the incidence of selected adverse reactions and laboratory abnormalities occurring in ≥10% of gemcitabine for injection -treated patients and at a higher incidence in the gemcitabine for injection with cisplatin arm, reported in a randomized trial (Study 4) of gemcitabine for injection with cisplatin (n=69) administered in 21-day cycles as compared to etoposide with cisplatin (n=66) in patients receiving first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [see Clinical Studies (14.3)]. Additional clinically significant adverse reactions are provided following Table 10.

Patients in the gemcitabine for injection /cisplatin (GC) arm received a median of 5 cycles and those in the etoposide/cisplatin (EC) arm received a median of 4 cycles. The majority of patients receiving more than one cycle of treatment required dose adjustments; 81% in the GC arm and 68% in the EC arm. The incidence of hospitalizations for adverse reactions was 22% in the GC arm and 27% in the EC arm. The proportion of patients who discontinued treatment for adverse reactions was higher in the GC arm (14% versus 8%). The proportion of patients who were hospitalized for febrile neutropenia was lower in the GC arm (7% versus 12%). There was one death attributed to treatment, a patient with febrile neutropenia and renal failure, which occurred in the GC arm.

Table 9: Selected Adverse Reactions in Patients Receiving Gemcitabine with Cisplatin in Study 4

Table 10: Selected Laboratory Abnormalities Occurring in Patients Receiving Gemcitabine with Cisplatin in Study 4

Breast Cancer

Tables 11 and 12 presents the incidence of selected adverse reactions and laboratory abnormalities, occurring in ≥10% of gemcitabine for injection-treated patients and at a higher incidence in the gemcitabine for injection with paclitaxel arm, reported in a randomized trial (Study 2) of gemcitabine for injection with paclitaxel (n=262) compared to paclitaxel alone (n=259) for the first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in women who received anthracycline-containing chemotherapy in the adjuvant/neo-adjuvant setting or for whom anthracyclines were contraindicated [see Clinical Studies (14.2)]. Additional clinically significant adverse reactions, occurring in <10% of patients, are provided following Table 12.

The requirement for dose reduction of paclitaxel were higher for patients in the gemcitabine for injection/paclitaxel arm (5% versus 2%). The number of paclitaxel doses omitted (<1%), the proportion of patients discontinuing treatment for adverse reactions (7% versus 5%) and the number of treatment-related deaths (1 patient in each arm) were similar between the two arms.

Table 11: Selected Adverse Reactions Occurring in Patients Receiving Gemcitabine with Paclitaxel and at Higher Incidence than in Patients Receiving Single Agent Paclitaxel [Between Arm Difference of ≥5% (All Grades) or ≥2% (Grades 3-4)] in Study 2

Table 12: Selected Laboratory Abnormalities Occurring in >10% of Patients Receiving Gemcitabine with Paclitaxel and at a Higher Incidence than Patients Receiving Single Agent Paclitaxel [Between Arm Difference of ≥5% (All Grades) or ≥2% (Grades 3-4)] in Study 2

Clinically relevant Grade 3 or 4 dyspnea occurred with a higher incidence in the gemcitabine for injection with paclitaxel arm compared with the paclitaxel arm (1.9% versus 0).

Ovarian Cancer

Tables 13 and 14 present the incidence of selected adverse reactions and laboratory abnormalities, occurring in ≥10% of gemcitabine for injection-treated patients and at a higher incidence in the gemcitabine for injection with carboplatin arm, reported in a randomized trial (Study 1) of gemcitabine for injection with carboplatin (n=175) compared to carboplatin alone (n=174) for the second-line treatment of ovarian cancer in women with disease that had relapsed more than 6 months following first-line platinum-based chemotherapy [see Clinical Studies (14.1)]. Additional clinically significant adverse reactions, occurring in <10% of patients, are provided following Table 14.

The proportion of patients with dose adjustments for carboplatin (1.8% versus 3.8%), doses of carboplatin omitted (0.2% versus 0) and discontinuing treatment for adverse reactions (11% versus 10%), were similar between arms. Dose adjustment for gemcitabine for injection occurred in 10% of patients and gemcitabine for injection dose was omitted in 14% of patients in the gemcitabine for injection/carboplatin arm.

Table 13: Adverse Reactions Occurring in >10% of Patients Receiving in Gemcitabine with Carboplatin and at Higher Incidence than in Patients Receiving Single Agent Carboplatin [Between Arm Difference of ≥5% (All Grades) or ≥2% (Grades 3-4)] in Study 1

Table 14: Laboratory Abnormalities Occurring in Patients Receiving Gemcitabine with Carboplatin and at Higher Incidence than in Patients Receiving Single Agent Carboplatin [Between Arm Difference of ≥5% (All Grades) or ≥2% (Grades 3-4)] in Study 1

Hematopoietic growth factors were administered more frequently in the gemcitabine for injection-containing arm: leukocyte growth factor (24% and 10%) and erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (7% and 3.9%).

The following clinically relevant Grade 3 and 4 adverse reactions occurred more frequently in the gemcitabine for injection with carboplatin arm: dyspnea (3.4% versus 2.9%), febrile neutropenia (1.1% versus 0), hemorrhagic event (2.3% versus 1.1 %), motor neuropathy (1.1% versus 0.6%), and rash/desquamation (0.6% versus 0).

Adverse Reactionsb Gemcitabine for Injection c  
   All Grades
(%) 
Grade 3 (%)  Grade 4 (%)  
Nausea and Vomiting 69 13 
Fever  41   2  0
Rash   30 <1 
Dyspnea   23  3  <1
Diarrhea   19  1  0
Hemorrhage 17 <1 <1
Infection  16  1  <1
Alopecia  15  <1  0
Stomatitis  11  <1  0
Somnolence  11  <1  <1
Paresthesias  10  <1  0
Laboratory Abnormalityb Gemcitabine for Injection c
All Grades
(%)
Grade 3
(%)
Grade 4
(%)
Hematologic
    Anemia 68 7 1
    Neutropenia 63 19 6
    Thrombocytopenia 24 4 1
Hepatic
    Increased ALT 68 8 2
    Increased AST 67 6 2
    Increased Alkaline Phosphatase 55 7 2
    Hyperbilirubinemia 13 2 <1
Renal
    Proteinuria 45 <1 0
    Hematuria 35 <1 0
    Increased BUN 16 0 0
    Increased Creatinine 8 <1 0
Adverse Reactionsb Gemcitabine for Injection /Cisplatinc Cisplatind
All Grades (%) Grade 3
(%)
Grade 4 (%) All Grades
(%)
Grade 3
(%)
Grade 4
(%)
Nausea 93 25 2 87 20 <1
Vomiting 78 11 12 71 10 9
Alopecia 53 1 0 33 0 0
Neuro Motor 35 12 0 15 3 0
Diarrhea 24 2 2 13 0 0
Neuro Sensory 23 1 0 18 1 0
Infection 18 3 2 12 1 0
Fever 16 0 0 5 0 0
Neuro Cortical 16 3 1 9 1 0
Neuro Mood 16 1 0 10 1 0
Local 15 0 0 6 0 0
Neuro Headache 14 0 0 7 0 0
Stomatitis 14 1 0 5 0 0
Hemorrhage 14 1 0 4 0 0
Hypotension 12 1 0 7 1 0
Rash 11 0 0 3 0 0
a Grade based on National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC).
b Non-laboratory events were graded only if assessed to be possibly drug-related.
c N=217-253; all gemcitabine for injection /cisplatin patients with laboratory or non-laboratory data
d N=213-248; all cisplatin patients with laboratory or non-laboratory data
Laboratory Abnormalityb Gemcitabine for Injection /Cisplatin Cisplatin
All Grades (%) Grade 3 (%) Grade 4 (%) All Grades (%) Grade 3 (%) Grade 4 (%)
Hematologic
Anemia 89 22 3 67 6 1
Thrombocytopenia 85 25 25 13 3 1
Neutropenia 79 22 35 20 3 1
Lymphopenia 75 25 18 51 12 5
RBC Transfusionse 39 - - 13 - -
Platelet Transfusionse 21 - - <1 - -
Hepatic
Increased Transaminases 22 2 1 10 1 0
Increased Alkaline Phosphatase 19 1 0 13 0 0
Renal
Elevated creatinine 38 4 <1 31 2 <1
Proteinuria 23 0 0 18 0 0
Hematuria 15 0 0 13 0 0
Other Laboratory
Hyperglycemia 30 4 0 23 3 0
Hypomagnesemia 30 4 3 17 2 0
Hypocalcemia 18 2 0 7 0 <1
a Grade based on National Cancer Institute CTC.
b Regardless of causality.
c N=217-253; all gemcitabine for injection plus cisplatin patients with laboratory or non-laboratory data
d N=213-248; all cisplatin patients with laboratory or non-laboratory data
e Percent of patients receiving transfusions. Percent transfusions are not CTC-graded events.
Adverse Reactionsb Gemcitabine for Injection /Cisplatinc Etoposide/Cisplatind
All Grades (%) Grade 3 (%) Grade 4 (%) All Grades (%) Grade 3 (%) Grade 4 (%)
Nausea and Vomiting 96 35 4 86 19 7
Alopecia 77 13 0 92 51 0
Paresthesias 38 0 0 16 2 0
Infection 28 3 1 21 8 0
Stomatitis 20 4 0 18 2 0
Diarrhea 14 1 1 13 0 2
Edemae 12 - - 2 - -
Rash 10 0 0 3 0 0
Hemorrhage 9 0 3 3 0 3
Fever 6 0 0 3 0 0
Somnolence 3 0 0 3 2 0
Flu-like syndromee 3 - - 0 - -
Dyspnea 1 0 1 3 0 0
a Grade based on criteria from the WHO.
b Non-laboratory events were graded only if assessed to be possibly drug-related. Pain data were not collected.
c N=67-69; all gemcitabine for injection/cisplatin patients with laboratory or non-laboratory data.
d N=57-63; all etoposide/cisplatin patients with laboratory or non-laboratory data.
e Flu-like syndrome and edema were not graded.
Laboratory Abnormalityb Gemcitabine for Injection /Cisplatinc Etoposide/Cisplatind
All Grades (%) Grade 3 (%) Grade 4 (%) All Grades (%) Grade 3 (%) Grade 4 (%)
Hematologic
Anemia 88 22 0 77 13 2
Neutropenia 88 36 28 87 20 56
Thrombocytopenia 81 39 16 45 8 5
RBC Transfusionsc 29 - - 21 - -
Platelet Transfusionse 3 - - 8 - -
Hepatic
Increased Alkaline Phosphatase 16 0 0 11 0 0
Increased ALT 6 0 0 12 0 0
Increased AST 3 0 0 11 0 0
Bilirubin 0 0 0 0 0 0
Renal
Hematuria 22 0 0 10 0 0
Proteinuria 12 0 0 5 0 0
BUN 6 0 0 4 0 0
Creatinine 2 0 0 2 0 0
a Grade based on criteria from the WHO.
b Regardless of causality.
c N=67-69; all gemcitabine for injection/cisplatin patients with laboratory or non-laboratory data.
d N=57-63; all etoposide/cisplatin patients with laboratory or non-laboratory data.
e WHO grading scale not applicable to proportion of patients with transfusions.
Adverse Reactionsb Gemcitabine for Injection /Paclitaxel
(N=262)
Paclitaxel
(N=259)
All Grades (%) Grade 3
(%)
Grade 4 (%) All Grades (%) Grade 3
(%)
Grade 4
(%)
Alopecia 90 14 4 92 19 3
Neuropathy-sensory 64 5 <1 58 3 0
Nausea 50 1 0 31 2 0
Fatigue 40 6 <1 28 1 <1
Vomiting 29 2 0 15 2 0
Diarrhea 20 3 0 13 2 0
Anorexia 17 0 0 12 <1 0
Neuropathy-motor 15 2 <1 10 <1 0
Stomatitis/pharyngitis 13 1 <1 8 <1 0
Fever 13 <1 0 3 0 0
Rash/desquamation 11 <1 <1 5 0 0
Febrile neutropenia 6 5 <1 2 1 0
a Grade based on National Cancer Institute CTC Version 2.0.
b Non-laboratory events were graded only if assessed to be possibly drug-related.
Laboratory Abnormalityb Gemcitabine for Injection /Paclitaxel
(N=262)
Paclitaxel
(N=259)
All Grades (%) Grade 3
(%)
Grade 4
(%)
All Grades (%) Grade 3
(%)
Grade 4
(%)
Hematologic
Anemia 69 6 1 51 3 <1
Neutropenia 69 31 17 31 4 7
Thrombocytopenia 26 5 <1 7 <1 <1
Hepatobiliary
Increased ALT 18 5 <1 6 <1 0
Increased AST 16 2 0 5 <1 0
a Grade based on National Cancer Institute CTC Version 2.0.
b Regardless of causality.
Adverse Reactionsb Gemcitabine for Injection /Carboplatin (N=175) Carboplatin
(N=174)
All Grades (%) Grade 3
(%)
Grade 4
(%)
All Grades (%) Grade 3
(%)
Grade 4 (%)
Nausea 69 6 0 61 3 0
Alopecia 49 0 0 17 0 0
Vomiting 46 6 0 36 2 <1
Constipation 42 6 1 37 3 0
Fatigue 40 3 <1 32 5 0
Diarrhea 25 3 0 14 <1 0
Stomatitis/pharyngitis 22 <1 0 13 0 0
a Grade based on National Cancer Institute CTC Version 2.0.
b Regardless of causality.
Laboratory Abnormalityb Gemcitabine for Injection /Carboplatin (N=175) Carboplatin
(N=174)
All Grades (%) Grade 3
(%)
Grade 4
(%)
All Grades (%) Grade 3
(%)
Grade 4 (%)
Hematologic
Neutropenia 90 42 29 58 11 1
Anemia 86 22 6 75 9 2
Thrombocytopenia 78 30 5 57 10 1
RBC Transfusionsc 38 - - 15 - -
Platelet Transfusionsc 9 - - 3 - -
a Grade based on National Cancer Institute CTC Version 2.0.
b Regardless of causality.
c Percent of patients receiving transfusions. Transfusions are not CTC-graded events. Blood transfusions included both packed red blood cells and whole blood.

The following adverse reactions have been identified during postapproval use of gemcitabine for injection. Because these reactions are reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not always possible to reliably estimate their frequency or establish a causal relationship to drug exposure.

Risk Summary

Based on animal data and its mechanism of action, gemcitabine for injection can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.1)]. There are no available data on the use of gemcitabine for injection in pregnant women. In animal reproduction studies, gemcitabine was teratogenic, embryotoxic, and fetotoxic in mice and rabbits (see Data). Advise pregnant women of the potential risk to a fetus [see Use in Special Populations (8.3)].

In the U.S. general population, the estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriages in clinically recognized pregnancies 2 to 4% and 15 to 20% respectively.

Data

Animal Data

Gemcitabine is embryotoxic in mice. Daily dosing of gemcitabine to pregnant mice increased the incidence of fetal malformation (cleft palate, incomplete ossification) at doses of 1.5 mg/kg/day [approximately 0.005 times the 1000 mg/m clinical dose based on body surface area (BSA)]. Gemcitabine was embryotoxic and fetotoxic in rabbits. Daily dosing of gemcitabine to pregnant rabbits resulted in fetotoxicity (decreased fetal viability, reduced litter sizes, and developmental delays) and increased the incidence of fetal malformations (fused pulmonary artery, absence of gall bladder) at doses of 0.1 mg/kg/day (approximately 0.002 times the 1000 mg/m clinical dose based on BSA).

Risk Summary

There is no information regarding the presence of gemcitabine or its metabolites in human milk, or their effects on the breastfed infant or on milk production. Due to the potential for serious adverse reactions in breastfed infants from gemcitabine, advise women not to breastfeed during treatment with gemcitabine for injection and for at least one week following the last dose.

Pregnancy Testing

Verify pregnancy status in females of reproductive potential prior to initiating gemcitabine for injection [see Use in Specific Populations (8.1)].

Contraception

Gemcitabine for injection can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman [see Use in Specific Populations (8.1)].

Females

Because of the potential for genotoxicity, advise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with gemcitabine for injection and for 6 months after the final dose of gemcitabine for injection.

Males

Because of the potential for genotoxicity, advise males with female partners of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with gemcitabine for injection and for 3 months after the last dose of gemcitabine for injection [see Nonclinical Toxicology (13.1)].

Infertility

Males

Based on animal studies, gemcitabine for injection may impair fertility in males of reproductive potential. It is not known whether these effects on fertility are reversible [see Nonclinical Toxicology (13.1)].

The safety and effectiveness of gemcitabine for injection have not been established in pediatric patients.

The safety and pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine were evaluated in a trial in pediatric patients with refractory leukemia. The maximum tolerated dose was 10 mg/m/min for 360 minutes weekly for three weeks followed by a one-week rest period.

The safety and activity of gemcitabine for injection were evaluated in a trial of pediatric patients with relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (22 patients) and acute myelogenous leukemia (10 patients) at a dose of 10 mg/m/min administered over 360 minutes weekly for three weeks followed by a one-week rest period. Patients with M1 or M2 bone marrow on Day 28 who did not experience unacceptable toxicity were eligible to receive a maximum of one additional four-week course. Toxicities observed included myelosuppression, febrile neutropenia, increased serum transaminases, nausea, and rash/desquamation. No meaningful clinical activity was observed in this trial.

In clinical studies which enrolled 979 patients with various malignancies who received single agent gemcitabine for injection, no overall differences in safety were observed between patients aged 65 and older and younger patients, with the exception of a higher rate of Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia in older patients as compared to younger patients.

In a randomized trial in women with ovarian cancer (Study 1), 175 women received gemcitabine for injection with carboplatin, of which 29% were age 65 years or older. Similar effectiveness was observed between older and younger women. There was significantly higher Grade 3-4 neutropenia in women 65 years of age or older [see Dosage and Administration (2.1)].

Gemcitabine for injection clearance is affected by age; however, there are no recommended dose adjustments based on patients’ age [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)].

Gemcitabine for injection clearance is decreased in females [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)]. In single agent studies of gemcitabine for injection, women, especially older women, were more likely not to proceed to a subsequent cycle and to experience Grade 3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia [see Dosage and Administration (2.1, 2.2. 2.3, 2.4)].

There is no known antidote for overdoses of gemcitabine. Myelosuppression, paresthesias, and severe rash were the principal toxicities seen when a single dose as high as 5700 mg/m was administered by intravenous infusion over 30 minutes every 2 weeks to several patients in a dose-escalation study. In the event of suspected overdose, monitor with appropriate blood counts and provide supportive therapy, as necessary.

Gemcitabine for Injection, USP is a nucleoside metabolic inhibitor that exhibits antitumor activity. Gemcitabine hydrochloride, USP is 2´-deoxy-2´,2´-difluorocytidine monohydrochloride (β-isomer).

The structural formula is as follows:

The molecular formula for gemcitabine hydrochloride, USP is CHFNO • HCl. It has a molecular weight of 299.66.

Gemcitabine hydrochloride, USP is soluble in water, slightly soluble in methanol, and practically insoluble in ethanol and polar organic solvents.

Gemcitabine for Injection, USP is supplied in a sterile form for intravenous use only. Vials of Gemcitabine for Injection, USP contain either 200 mg, 1 g, or 2 g of gemcitabine hydrochloride, USP (expressed as free base) formulated with mannitol (200 mg, 1 g, or 2 g respectively) and sodium acetate (12.5 mg, 62.5 mg, or 125 mg respectively) as a sterile lyophilized powder. Sodium hydroxide may have been added for pH adjustment.

.

Gemcitabine kills cells undergoing DNA synthesis and blocks the progression of cells through the G1/S-phase boundary. Gemcitabine is metabolized by nucleoside kinases to diphosphate (dFdCDP) and triphosphate (dFdCTP) nucleosides. Gemcitabine diphosphate inhibits ribonucleotide reductase, an enzyme responsible for catalyzing the reactions that generate deoxynucleoside triphosphates for DNA synthesis, resulting in reductions in deoxynucleotide concentrations, including dCTP. Gemcitabine triphosphate competes with dCTP for incorporation into DNA. The reduction in the intracellular concentration of dCTP by the action of the diphosphate enhances the incorporation of gemcitabine triphosphate into DNA (self-potentiation). After the gemcitabine nucleotide is incorporated into DNA, only one additional nucleotide is added to the growing DNA strands, which eventually results in the initiation of apoptotic cell death.

The pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine were examined in 353 patients with various solid tumors. Pharmacokinetic parameters were derived using data from patients treated for varying durations of therapy given weekly with periodic rest weeks and using both short infusions (<70 minutes) and long infusions (70 to 285 minutes). The total gemcitabine for injection dose varied from 500 mg/mto 3600 mg/m.

Distribution

The volume of distribution was increased with infusion length. Volume of distribution of gemcitabine was 50 L/mfollowing infusions lasting <70 minutes. For long infusions, the volume of distribution rose to 370 L/m.

Gemcitabine pharmacokinetics are linear and are described by a 2-compartment model. Population pharmacokinetic analyses of combined single and multiple dose studies showed that the volume of distribution of gemcitabine was significantly influenced by duration of infusion and sex. Gemcitabine plasma protein binding is negligible.

Elimination

Metabolism

The active metabolite, gemcitabine triphosphate, can be extracted from peripheral blood mononuclear cells. The half-life of the terminal phase for gemcitabine triphosphate from mononuclear cells ranges from 1.7 to 19.4 hours.

Excretion

Gemcitabine disposition was studied in 5 patients who received a single 1000 mg/mof radiolabeled drug as a 30-minute infusion. Within one week, 92% to 98% of the dose was recovered, almost entirely in the urine. Gemcitabine (<10%) and the inactive uracil metabolite, 2´-deoxy-2´,2´-difluorouridine (dFdU) accounted for 99% of the excreted dose. The metabolite dFdU is also found in plasma.

Specific Populations

Geriatric Patients

Clearance of gemcitabine was affected by age. The lower clearance in geriatric patients results in higher concentrations of gemcitabine for any given dose. Differences in either clearance or volume of distribution based on patient characteristics or the duration of infusion result in changes in half-life and plasma concentrations. Table 15 shows plasma clearance and half-life of gemcitabine following short infusions for typical patients by age and gender.

Table 15: Gemcitabine Clearance and Half-Life for the “Typical” Patient

Half-life for patients receiving <70 minute infusion.

Gemcitabine half-life for short infusions ranged from 42 to 94 minutes and for long infusions varied from 245 to 638 minutes, depending on age and gender, reflecting a greatly increased volume of distribution with longer infusions.

Male and Female Patients

Females have lower clearance and longer half-lives than male patients as described in Table 15.

Patients with Renal Impairment

No clinical studies have been conducted with gemcitabine in patients with decreased renal function.

Patients with Hepatic Impairment

No clinical studies have been conducted with gemcitabine in patients with decreased hepatic function.

Drug Interaction Studies

When gemcitabine for injection (1250 mg/mon Days 1 and 8) and cisplatin (75 mg/mon Day 1) were administered in patients with NSCLC, the clearance of gemcitabine on Day 1 was 128 L/hr/mand on Day 8 was 107 L/hr/m. Data from patients with NSCLC demonstrate that gemcitabine for injection and carboplatin given in combination does not alter the pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine or carboplatin compared to administration of either single agent; however, due to wide confidence intervals and small sample size, interpatient variability may be observed.

Data from metastatic breast cancer patients shows that gemcitabine for injection has little or no effect on the pharmacokinetics (clearance and half-life) of paclitaxel and paclitaxel has little or no effect on the pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine.

Age  Clearance Men (L/hr/m2  Clearance Women (L/hr/m2)  Half-Lifea Men (min)  Half-Lifea Women (min)
 29  92.2  69.4  42  49
 45  75.7  57.0  48  57
 65  55.1  41.5  61  73
 79  40.7  30.7  79  94

Long-term animal studies to evaluate the carcinogenic potential of gemcitabine for injection have not been conducted. Gemcitabine was mutagenic in an in vitro mouse lymphoma (L5178Y) assay and was clastogenic in an in vivo mouse micronucleus assay. Gemcitabine intraperitoneal doses of 0.5 mg/kg/day [about 1/700 the 1000 mg/mclinical dose based on body surface area (BSA)] in male mice resulted in moderate to severe hypospermatogenesis, decreased fertility, and decreased implantations. In female mice, fertility was not affected but maternal toxicities were observed at 1.5 mg/kg/day administered intravenously (about 1/200 the 1000 mg/mclinical dose based on BSA) and fetotoxicity or embryolethality was observed at 0.25 mg/kg/day administered intravenously (about 1/1300 the 1000 mg/mclinical dose based on BSA).

The efficacy of gemcitabine for injection was evaluated in a randomized trial (Study 1) conducted in women with advanced ovarian cancer that had relapsed at least 6 months after first-line platinum-based therapy. Patients were randomized to receive either gemcitabine for injection 1000 mg/mon Days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle with carboplatin AUC 4 on Day 1 after gemcitabine for injection administration (n=178) or carboplatin AUC 5 on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle (n=178). The major efficacy outcome measure was progression free survival (PFS).

A total of 356 patients were enrolled. Demographics and baseline characteristics are shown in Table 16.

Efficacy results are presented in Table 17 and Figure 1. The addition of gemcitabine for injection to carboplatin resulted in statistically significant improvements in PFS and overall response rate. Approximately 75% of patients in each arm received additional chemotherapy for disease progression; 13 of 120 patients in the carboplatin alone arm received gemcitabine for injection for treatment of disease progression. There was no significant difference in overall survival between the treatment arms.

Table 16: Baseline Demographics and Clinical Characteristics for Study 1

Table 17: Efficacy Results in Study 1

Gemcitabine for Injection/Carboplatin (N=178)
Carboplatin
(N=178)
     
Median age, years 59 58
Range 36 to 78 21 to 81
Baseline ECOG performance status 0 to 1a 94% 95%
Disease Status
Evaluable 8% 3%
Bidimensionally measurable 92% 96%
Platinum-free intervalb
6 to 12 months 40% 40%
>12 months 59% 60%
First-line therapy
Platinum-taxane combination 70% 71%
Platinum-non-taxane combination 29% 28%
Platinum monotherapy 1% 1%
a 5 patients on gemcitabine for injection plus carboplatin arm and 4 patients on carboplatin arm had no baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status.
b 2 on Gemcitabine for Injection, USP plus carboplatin arm and 1 on carboplatin arm had platinum-free interval <6 months.
 
Gemcitabine for Injection/Carboplatin Carboplatin
(N=178) (N=178)
Progression-free Survival
Median (95% CIa) months 8.6 (8.0, 9.7) 5.8 (5.2, 7.1)
Hazard Ratio (95% CI) 0.72 (0.57, 0.90)
p-valueb p=0.0038
Overall Survival
Median (95% CI) months 18.0 (16.2, 20.3) 17.3 (15.2, 19.3)
Hazard Ratio (95% CI) 0.98 (0.78, 1.24)
p-valueb p=0.8977
Investigator Reviewed
Overall Response Rate 47.2% 30.9%
p-valuec p=0.0016
CRd 14.6% 6.2%
PR with PRNMe 32.6% 24.7%
Independently Reviewed
Overall Response Ratef 46.3% 35.6%
p-valuec p=0.11
CRd 9.1% 4.0%
PR with PRNMe 37.2% 31.7%
a CI=confidence interval.
b Log rank, unadjusted.
c Chi square.
d CR = Complete response.
ePR with PRNM=Partial response with partial response, non-measurable disease.
f Independently reviewed cohort - gemcitabine for Injection/carboplatin (n=121), carboplatin (n=101); independent reviewers unable to measure disease detected by sonography or physical exam.

The efficacy of gemcitabine for injection were evaluated in a multi-national, randomized, open-label trial (Study 2) conducted in women receiving initial treatment for metastatic breast cancer and who have received prior adjuvant/neoadjuvant anthracycline chemotherapy unless clinically contraindicated. Patients were randomized to receive either gemcitabine for injection 1250 mg/mon Days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle with paclitaxel 175 mg/madministered on Day 1 before gemcitabine for injection administration (n=267) or paclitaxel 175 mg/mon Day 1 of each 21-day cycle (n=262). The major efficacy outcome measure was time to documented disease progression.

A total of 529 patients were enrolled. Demographic and baseline characteristics were similar between treatment arms (Table 18).

Efficacy results are presented in Table 19 and Figure 2. The addition of gemcitabine for injection to paclitaxel resulted in statistically significant improvement in time to documented disease progression and overall response rate compared to paclitaxel alone. There was no significant difference in overall survival.

Table 18: Baseline Demographics and Clinical Characteristics for Study 2

Karnofsky Performance Status.

Table 19: Efficacy Results in Study 2

These represent reconciliation of investigator and Independent Review Committee assessments according to a predefined algorithm.

Based on the ITT population. 

Figure 2: Kaplan-Meier Curves for Time to Documented Disease Progression in Study 2

   Gemcitabine for Injection /Paclitaxel
(N=267)
Paclitaxel
(N=262) 
Median age (years)  53  52
   Range   26 to 83  26 to 75
Metastatic disease  97%  97%
Baseline KPSa ≥90  70%  74%
Number of tumor sites    
   1 to 2  57%  59%
   ≥3  43%  41%
Visceral disease  73%  73%
Prior anthracycline  97%  96%
Efficacy Parameter  Gemcitabine for Injection /Paclitaxel
(N=267) 
Paclitaxel
(N=262) 
 Time to Documented Disease Progressiona    
    Median (95% CI) in months  5.2 (4.2, 5.6)  2.9 (2.6, 3.7)
    Hazard Ratio (95% CI)  0.650 (0.524, 0.805)
    p-value  p<0.0001
 Overall Survivalb    
    Median (95% CI) in months  18.6 (16.5, 20.7)  15.8 (14.1, 17.3)
    Hazard Ratio (95% CI)  0.86 (0.71, 1.04)
    p-value  Not Significant
 Overall Response Rate  40.8%  22.1%
    (95% CI)  (34.9, 46.7)  (17.1, 27.2)
    p-value  p<0.0001

The efficacy of gemcitabine for injection was evaluated in two randomized, multicenter trials.

Study 3: 28-Day Schedule

A multinational, randomized trial (Study 3) compared gemcitabine for injection with cisplatin to cisplatin alone in the treatment of patients with inoperable Stage IIIA, IIIB, or IV NSCLC who had not received prior chemotherapy. Patients were randomized to receive either gemcitabine for injection 1000 mg/mon Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle with cisplatin 100 mg/mon Day 1 after gemcitabine for injection administration (N=260) or cisplatin 100 mg/mon Day 1 of each 28-day cycle (N=262). The major efficacy outcome measure was overall survival.

A total of 522 patients were enrolled. Demographics and baseline characteristics (Table 20) were similar between arms with the exception of histologic subtype of NSCLC, with 48% of patients on the cisplatin arm and 37% of patients on the gemcitabine for injection with cisplatin arm having adenocarcinoma.

Efficacy results are presented in Table 21 and Figure 3.

Study 4: 21-Day Schedule

A randomized (1:1), multicenter trial (Study 4) was conducted in patients with Stage IIIB or IV NSCLC. Patients were randomized to receive either gemcitabine for injection 1250 mg/mon Days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle with cisplatin 100 mg/mon Day 1 after gemcitabine for injection administration or etoposide 100 mg/mintravenously on Days 1, 2, and 3 with cisplatin 100 mg/mon Day 1 of each 21 -day cycle. The major efficacy outcome measure was response rate.

A total of 135 patients were enrolled. Demographics and baseline characteristics are summarized in Table 20.

Efficacy results are presented in Table 21. There was no significant difference in survival between the two treatment arms. The median survival was 8.7 months for the gemcitabine for injection with cisplatin arm versus 7 months for the etoposide with cisplatin arm. Median time to disease progression for the gemcitabine for injection with cisplatin arm was 5 months compared to 4.1 months on the etoposide with cisplatin arm (Log rank p=0.015, two-sided). The objective response rate for the gemcitabine for injection with cisplatin arm was 33% compared to 14% on the etoposide with cisplatin arm (Fisher’s Exact p=0.01, two-sided).

Table 20: Baseline Demographics and Clinical Characteristics for Studies 3 and 4

 

Table 21: Efficacy Results for Studies 3 and 4

Figure 3: Kaplan-Meier Curves for Overall Survival in Study 3

Trial 28-day Schedule (Study 3) 21-day Schedule (Study 4)
Treatment Arm Gemcitabine for Injection/ Cisplatin
(N=260)
Cisplatin
(N=262)
Gemcitabine for Injection/ Cisplatin
(N=69)
Etoposide/Cisplatin
(N=66)
   Male 70% 71% 93% 92%
Median age, years 62 63 58 60
   Range 36 to 88 35 to 79 33 to 76 35 to 75
Stage IIIA 7% 7% N/Aa N/Aa
Stage IIIB 26% 23% 48% 52%
Stage IV 67% 70% 52% 49%
Baseline KPSb 70 to 80 41% 44% 45% 52%
Baseline KPSb 90 to 100 57% 55% 55% 49%
N/A Not applicable.
Karnofsky Performance Status.
 
Trial 28-day Schedule (Study 3) 21-day Schedule (Study 4)

Efficacy Parameter 
Gemcitabine for Injection/Cisplatin (N=260) Cisplatin
(N=262)
Gemcitabine for Injection/Cisplatin (N=69) Etoposide/Cisplatin
(N=66)
Survival
Median (95% CIa) in months 9.0 (8.2, 11.0) 7.6 (6.6, 8.8) 8.7 (7.8, 10.1) 7.0 (6.0, 9.7)
p-valueb p=0.008 p=0.18
Time to Disease Progression
Median (95% CIa) in months 5.2 (4.2, 5.7) 3.7 (3.0, 4.3) 5.0 (4.2, 6.4) 4.1 (2.4, 4.5)
p-valueb p=0.009 p=0.015
Tumor Response 26% 10% 33% 14%
p-valueb p<0.0001 p=0.01
a CI=confidence intervals.
b p-value two-sided Fisher’s Exact test for difference in binomial proportions; log rank test for time-to-event analyses.

The efficacy of gemcitabine for injection was evaluated in two trials (Studies 5 and 6), a randomized, single-blind, two-arm, active-controlled trial (Study 5) conducted in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer who had received no prior chemotherapy and in a single-arm, open-label, multicenter trial (Study 6) conducted in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer previously treated with fluorouracil or a fluorouracil-containing regimen. In Study 5, patients were randomized to receive either gemcitabine for injection 1000 mg/m intravenously over 30 minutes once weekly for 7 weeks followed by a one-week rest, then once weekly for 3 consecutive weeks every 28-days in subsequent cycles (n=63) or fluorouracil 600 mg/m intravenously over 30 minutes once weekly (n=63). In Study 6, all patients received gemcitabine for injection 1000 mg/m intravenously over 30 minutes once weekly for 7 weeks followed by a one-week rest, then once weekly for 3 consecutive weeks every 28-days in subsequent cycles.

The major efficacy outcome measure in both trials was “clinical benefit response”. A patient was considered to have had a clinical benefit response if either of the following occurred:

OR

Study 5 enrolled 126 patients. Demographics and baseline characteristics were similar between the arms (Table 22).

The efficacy results are shown in Table 23 and Figure 4. Patients treated with gemcitabine for injection had statistically significant increases in clinical benefit response, survival, and time to disease progression compared to those randomized to receive fluorouracil. No confirmed objective tumor responses were observed in either treatment arm.

Table 22: Baseline Demographics and Clinical Characteristics for Study 5

Karnofsky Performance Status.

 

Table 23: Efficacy Results in Study 5

p-value for clinical benefit response calculated using the two-sided test for difference in binomial proportions. All other p-values are calculated using log rank test.

Figure 4: Kaplan-Meier Curves for Overall Survival in Study 5

Gemcitabine for Injection
(N=63)
Fluorouracil
(N=63)
Male 54% 54%
Median age 62 years 61 years
Range 37 to 79 36 to 77
Stage IV disease 71% 76%
Baseline KPSa ≤70 70% 68%
Efficacy Parameter Gemcitabine for Injection (N=63) Fluorouracil
(N=63)
Clinical benefit response p-valuea 22.2% 4.8%
p=0.004
Overall Survival
Median (95% CI) in months 5.7 (4.7, 6.9) 4.2 (3.1, 5.1)
p-valuea p=0.0009
Time to Disease Progression
Median (95% CI) in months 2.1 (1.9, 3.4) 0.9 (0.9, 1.1)
p-valuea p=0.0013

Gemcitabine for Injection, USP is a white to off-white lyophilized powder and is supplied as follows:

Sterile, Nonpyrogenic, Preservative-free.

The container closure is not made with natural rubber latex.

  NDC   Gemcitabine for Injection, USP   Package Factor
  45963-612-57       200 mg Single-Dose Vial   1 vial per carton
  45963-619-59        1 g Single-Dose Vial   1 vial per carton
 45963-620-60   2 g Single-Dose Vial   1 vial per carton

Unopened vials of Gemcitabine for Injection, USP are stable until the expiration date indicated on the package when stored at controlled room temperature 20° to 25°C (68° to 77°F) and that allows for excursions between 15° and 30°C (59° and 86°F) [See USP Controlled Room Temperature] [see Dosage and Administration (2.6 and 2.7)].

Myelosuppression

Advise patients of the risks of myelosuppression. Instruct patients to immediately contact their healthcare provider should any signs or symptoms of infection, including fever, or if bleeding or signs of anemia, occur [see Warnings and Precautions (5.2)].

Pulmonary Toxicity

Advise patients of the risks of pulmonary toxicity, including respiratory failure and death. Instruct patients to immediately contact their healthcare provider for development of shortness of breath, wheezing, or cough [see Warnings and Precautions (5.3)].

Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome and Renal Failure

Advise patients of the risks of hemolytic-uremic syndrome and associated renal failure. Instruct patients to immediately contact their healthcare provider for changes in the color or volume of urine output or for increased bruising or bleeding [see Warnings and Precautions (5.4)].

Hepatic Toxicity

Advise patients of the risks of hepatic toxicity including liver failure and death. Instruct patients to immediately contact their healthcare provider for signs of jaundice or for pain/tenderness in the right upper abdominal quadrant [see Warnings and Precautions (5.5)].

Embryo-Fetal Toxicity

Advise females and males of reproductive potential that gemcitabine for injection can cause fetal harm. Advise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with gemcitabine for injection and for 6 months after the final dose. Advise male patients with female partners of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with gemcitabine for injection and for 3 months after the final dose [see Warnings and Precautions (5.6), Use in Specific Populations (8.1, 8.3)].

Lactation

Advise women not to breastfeed during treatment with gemcitabine for injection and for at least one week after the last dose [see Use in Specific Populations (8.2)].

Infertility

Advise males of reproductive potential of the potential for reduced fertility with gemcitabine for injection [see Use in Specific Populations (8.3), Nonclinical Toxicology (13.1)].

Made in Italy 

Distributed by: Actavis Pharma, Inc.Parsippany, NJ 07054 USA 

Rev. A 12/2018

Actavis

Rx Only

NDC 45963-612-57

Gemcitabine for Injection, USP

200 mg/vial

Lyophilized Powder

For Intravenous Use Only

DO NOT REFRIGERATE

CAUTION: Cytotoxic Agent

Single-Dose Vial

Actavis

Rx Only

NDC 45963-619-59

Gemcitabine for Injection, USP

1 g/vial

Lyophilized Powder

For Intravenous Use Only

DO NOT REFRIGERATE

CAUTION: Cytotoxic Agent

Single-Dose Vial

Actavis

Rx Only

NDC 45963-620-60

Gemcitabine for Injection, USP

2 g/vial

Lyophilized Powder

For Intravenous Use Only

DO NOT REFRIGERATE

CAUTION: Cytotoxic Agent

Single-Dose Vial

Manufacturer

Actavis Pharma, Inc.

Active Ingredients

Source

Drugs and Medications [242 Associated Drugs and Medications listed on BioPortfolio]

Gemcitabine [bedford laboratories]

These highlights do not include all the information needed to use gemcitabine for injection safely and effectively. See full prescribing information for gemcitabine for injection. Gemcitabine For Inje...

Gemcitabine [dr. reddy's laboratories limited ]

These highlights do not include all the information needed to used GEMCITABINE FOR INJECTION safely and effectively. See full prescribing information for GEMCITABINE FOR INJECTION. GEMCITABINE for inj...

Gemcitabine [hospira, inc.]

These highlights do not include all the information needed to use GEMCITABINE FOR INJECTION safely and effectively. See full prescribing information for GEMCITABINE FOR INJECTION. GEMCITABINE for inje...

Gemcitabine [hospira, inc.]

These highlights do not include all the information needed to use GEMCITABINE FOR INJECTION safely and effectively. See full prescribing information for GEMCITABINE FOR INJECTION.GEMCITABINE for injec...

Gemcitabine hydrochloride [bluepoint laboratories]

These highlights do not include all the information needed to use Gemcitabine for Injection safely and effectively. See full prescribing information for Gemcitabine for Injection. Gemcitabine for inje...

Clinical Trials [3163 Associated Clinical Trials listed on BioPortfolio]

Gemcitabine Hydrochloride With or Without GDC-0449 in Treating Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as gemcitabine hydrochloride, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from div...

Gemcitabine Hydrochloride, Dasatinib, and Erlotinib Hydrochloride in Treating Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer That Cannot Be Removed by Surgery

This phase I trial studies the side effects and best dose of gemcitabine hydrochloride and dasatinib when given together with erlotinib hydrochloride in treating patients with pancreatic c...

Cisplatin, Capecitabine, Gemcitabine Hydrochloride and Epirubicin Hydrochloride or Docetaxel in Treating Patients With Stage III or Stage IV Pancreatic Cancer

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as cisplatin, capecitabine, gemcitabine hydrochloride, epirubicin hydrochloride, and docetaxel, work in different ways to stop the growth of tum...

Gemcitabine Hydrochloride and Genistein in Treating Women With Stage IV Breast Cancer

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as gemcitabine hydrochloride and genistein, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping...

Gemcitabine Hydrochloride, Oxaliplatin, and Erlotinib Hydrochloride in Treating Patients With Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer, Pancreatic Cancer, Duodenal Cancer, or Ampullary Cancer

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as gemcitabine hydrochloride and oxaliplatin, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stoppi...

PubMed Articles [316 Associated PubMed Articles listed on BioPortfolio]

Comparison of Gemcitabine monotherapy with Gemcitabine and Cisplatin combination in metastatic pancreatic cancer: a retrospective analysis.

Gemcitabine is among the standard first-line agents for the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer. However, as the median survival with gemcitabine monotherapy is 6 months, different combinations ...

USP9X inhibition improves gemcitabine sensitivity in pancreatic cancer by inhibiting autophagy.

Gemcitabine is the cornerstone of pancreatic cancer treatment. Although effective in most patients, development of tumor resistance to gemcitabine can critically limit its efficacy. The mechanisms res...

Protective effects of berberine hydrochloride on DSS-induced ulcerative colitis in rats.

Berberine hydrochloride is one the effective compound among Rhizoma Coptidis, Cortex Phellodendri, and other plants. There are several clinical functions of berberine hydrochloride including anti-infl...

Digoxin sensitizes gemcitabine-resistant pancreatic cancer cells to gemcitabine via inhibiting Nrf2 signaling pathway.

Chemoresistance is a major therapeutic obstacle in the treatment of human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). As an oxidative stress responsive transcription factor, nuclear factor erythroid 2-re...

Gemcitabine exhibits a suppressive effect on pancreatic cancer cell growth by regulating processing of PVT1 to miR1207.

Gemcitabine serves as a first-line chemotherapy agent for advanced pancreatic cancer. However, the molecular basis by which gemcitabine exerts its effects is not well-established, and the targeted gen...

Advertisement
Quick Search
Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Relevant Topics

Ovarian Cancer
Ovarian Cancer is cancer that starts in the female reproductive organs, the ovaries. It is the fifth most common cancer among women.  Women at risk of Ovarian Cancer are those who have had few children (or had children at an older age), carriers o...

Gilotrif (afatinib)
GILOTRIF (afatinib) is a kinase inhibitor indicated for the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose tumors have epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 19 deletions or exon 21 (L8...


Drugs and Medication Quicklinks


Searches Linking to this Drug Record