Advertisement

Topics

Are university rankings useful to improve research? A systematic review.

07:00 EST 7th March 2018 | BioPortfolio

Summary of "Are university rankings useful to improve research? A systematic review."

Concerns about reproducibility and impact of research urge improvement initiatives. Current university ranking systems evaluate and compare universities on measures of academic and research performance. Although often useful for marketing purposes, the value of ranking systems when examining quality and outcomes is unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate usefulness of ranking systems and identify opportunities to support research quality and performance improvement.

Affiliation

Journal Details

This article was published in the following journal.

Name: PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Pages: e0193762

Links

DeepDyve research library

PubMed Articles [28669 Associated PubMed Articles listed on BioPortfolio]

Single screen of citations with excluded terms: an approach to citation screening in systematic reviews.

Citation screening during the systematic review process can be time-consuming due to the exponentially increasing amount of research. This letter describes an approach to expediting the process by sin...

Prevalence and predictors of khat chewing among Ethiopian university students: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Khat chewing has become a common practice among university students in developing countries like Ethiopia. It has a potential effect on physical, mental, social and cognitive aspects of student functi...

Child sexual abuse in India: A systematic review.

Child Sexual Abuse (CSA) is a pressing human right issue and public health concern. We conducted a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies published in the past decade on CSA in Indi...

Strategies to Improve Start Time in the Operating Theatre: a Systematic Review.

Operating theatres represent a significant cost burden for healthcare providers around the world. Theatre start time is widely acknowledged as an important target for efficiency savings. However, ther...

Peer review of health research funding proposals: A systematic map and systematic review of innovations for effectiveness and efficiency.

To investigate methods and processes for timely, efficient and good quality peer review of research funding proposals in health.

Clinical Trials [6625 Associated Clinical Trials listed on BioPortfolio]

Using a Systematic Review in Clinical Decision Making: a Pilot Parallel, Randomized Controlled Trial

The purpose of this pilot study is to determine the feasibility of running a full-scale trial that compares two formats of a shortened systematic review to a full-length systematic review ...

Testing New Formats for the Presentation of Research Evidence to Health Care Managers and Policy Makers

Despite advances in the conduct and reporting of traditional systematic reviews, current evidence suggests that they are used infrequently by health care managers and policy makers in deci...

Comparison of Three Summary of Finding Tables to Improve Understanding in the Presentation of Systematic Review Results: A Three-arm, Randomized, Controlled, Noninferiority Trial

Background: Summary of Findings (SoF) tables have been developed to present results of systematic reviews in a concise and explicit format. Adopted by many review groups including the Coch...

This Study Was a Prospective, One-arm Open Phase II Clinical Trial. A Systematic Review of the pCR of Apatinib in Combination With the Albumin Paclitaxel and Carboplatin Regimens for the Neoadjuvant Therapy of Triple-negative Breast Cancer, as Well as the

This study was a prospective, one-arm open phase II clinical trial. A systematic review of the pCR of apatinib in combination with the albumin paclitaxel and carboplatin regimens for the n...

Umbrella Review and Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Pulses/Legumes and Incident Cardiometabolic Diseases

The European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) guidelines have not made any specific recommendations regarding dietary pulses. To update the recommendations, the Diabetes and Nu...

Medical and Biotech [MESH] Definitions

Hospitals maintained by a university for the teaching of medical students, postgraduate training programs, and clinical research.

The evaluation by experts of the quality and pertinence of research or research proposals of other experts in the same field. Peer review is used by editors in deciding which submissions warrant publication, by granting agencies to determine which proposals should be funded, and by academic institutions in tenure decisions.

A formal process of examination of patient care or research proposals for conformity with ethical standards. The review is usually conducted by an organized clinical or research ethics committee (CLINICAL ETHICS COMMITTEES or RESEARCH ETHICS COMMITTEES), sometimes by a subset of such a committee, an ad hoc group, or an individual ethicist (ETHICISTS).

Published materials which provide an examination of recent or current literature. Review articles can cover a wide range of subject matter at various levels of completeness and comprehensiveness based on analyses of literature that may include research findings. The review may reflect the state of the art. It also includes reviews as a literary form.

Research carried out by nurses in the clinical setting and designed to provide information that will help improve patient care. Other professional staff may also participate in the research.

Advertisement
Quick Search
Advertisement
Advertisement

 


DeepDyve research library

Searches Linking to this Article