Advertisement

Topics

Change from Hybrid to Fully Minimally Invasive and Robotic Esophagectomy is Possible without Compromises.

08:00 EDT 14th September 2018 | BioPortfolio

Summary of "Change from Hybrid to Fully Minimally Invasive and Robotic Esophagectomy is Possible without Compromises."

 The incidence of esophageal carcinoma is increasing in the western world, and esophageal resection is the essential therapy. Several studies report advantages of minimally invasive esophagectomies (MIEs) versus conventional open procedures (OPs). The benefits of the use of fully MIE or robot-assisted MIE (RAMIE) compared with the hybrid approaches (laparoscopic gastric preparation and open transthoracic esophagectomy) remain unclear.

Affiliation

Journal Details

This article was published in the following journal.

Name: The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon
ISSN: 1439-1902
Pages:

Links

DeepDyve research library

PubMed Articles [12520 Associated PubMed Articles listed on BioPortfolio]

Does the Approach Matter? Comparing Survival in Robotic, Minimally Invasive and Open Esophagectomies.

Our objective is to determine how surgical approach impacts overall survival and postoperative outcomes when comparing robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE), minimally invasive eso...

Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.

Postoperative complications, especially pulmonary complications, affect more than half the patients who undergo open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Whether hybrid minimally invasive esophagectom...

FA01.01: MINIMALLY INVASIVE APPROACH RESULTS IN BETTER OUTCOME COMPARED TO OPEN ESOPHAGECTOMY-A PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHED ANALYSIS.

Esophagectomy remains the mainstay treatment for esophageal cancer. Minimally invasive techniques have gained popularity in recent years. Whether minimally invasive methods result in equivalent or sup...

Retrospective Comparison of Two Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy in the Treatment of Esophageal Cancer: Pneumatic Mediastinoscopy Versus Thoracoscopy.

To compare the clinical effectiveness of two approaches of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) in esophagectomy patients.

Morbidity in open versus minimally invasive hybrid esophagectomy (MIOMIE): Long-term results of a randomized controlled clinical study.

The minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer was introduced assuming a reduction of morbidity and operation time. After implementation of MIE at our institution, a randomized contr...

Clinical Trials [6024 Associated Clinical Trials listed on BioPortfolio]

Outcomes After Esophagectomy With a Focus on Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy and Quality of Life

To assess short and long term outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy compared to open esophagectomy. To compare both standard outcome measures as well as patient derived outcome ...

Robotic Versus Thoracolaparoscopic Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer

Esophageal cancer is a debilitating condition. The treatment involved is complex requiring a combination of chemotherapy and surgery in most cases. Complete removal of the tumor and the ad...

Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (MIE) in Prone Versus Left Decubitus Position

The purpose of this prospective randomized study is to compare clinical outcomes from two different patient position(prone vs left decubitus)with thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization in t...

Combined Thoracoscopic and Laparoscopic Esophagectomy vs. Hand-assisted Transhiatal Esophagectomy: A Prospective Trial.

Esophagectomy for benign or malignant disease of the esophagus can be performed using a transhiatal technique or Ivor Lewis technique (combined laparotomy with thoracotomy). These procedu...

Perioperative Management and Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy

The investigators retrospectively reviewed the data of all patients who had undergone esophagectomy and reconstruction in 2015. Patient characteristics, the surgery performed, method of an...

Medical and Biotech [MESH] Definitions

Procedures that avoid use of open invasive surgery in favor of closed or local surgery. These generally involve use of laparoscopic devices and remote-control manipulation of instruments with indirect observation of the surgical field through an endoscope or similar device. With the reduced trauma associated with minimally invasive surgery, long hospital stays may be reduced with increased rates of short stay or day surgery.

Procedures that avoid use of open, invasive surgery in favor of closed or local surgery. These generally involve use of laparoscopic devices and remote-controlled manipulation of instruments with indirect observation of the surgical field through an endoscope or similar device.

The use of ultrasound to guide minimally invasive surgical procedures such as needle ASPIRATION BIOPSY; DRAINAGE; etc. Its widest application is intravascular ultrasound imaging but it is useful also in urology and intra-abdominal conditions.

Minimally invasive procedures guided with the aid of magnetic resonance imaging to visualize tissue structures.

Minimally invasive procedures, diagnostic or therapeutic, performed within the BLOOD VESSELS. They may be perfomed via ANGIOSCOPY; INTERVENTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; INTERVENTIONAL RADIOGRAPHY; or INTERVENTIONAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY.

Advertisement
Quick Search
Advertisement
Advertisement

 


DeepDyve research library

Searches Linking to this Article