To estimate the incremental cost effectiveness ratio of pharmacological treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia from the payer's perspective.
This article was published in the following journal.
Name: Value in health regional issues
ISSN: 2212-1102
Pages: 174-182
A cost minimisation analysis compares the costs of different interventions' to ascertain the least expensive over time. We compared different prostate targeted drug treatments with TURP to identify ...
Although combination therapy with 5 alpha-reductase inhibitor (5ARI) and alpha-blocker is one of the standard interventions in symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), 5ARI monotherapy is seldo...
Prostatic artery embolization (PAE) has been introduced into clinical practice for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH-LUTS) despite a lack of ...
The minimally invasive procedures (mips) for the treatment of symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia (bph) are presented as attractive techniques due to their ease of accomplishment and the possibil...
Treatment of recalcitrant warts represents a continuing therapeutic challenge. Combination therapies can help improve treatment response, decrease adverse effects, and reduce recurrence.
Prostatic Artery Embolization Versus Medical Treatment in Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
The primary objective of this trial is to compare the 9-month effect on lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) of Prostatic Artery Embolization (PAE) using Embosphere® versus Standard Combin...
Prostate Embolization for Massive Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy (BPH)
This is a prospective, open label single center feasibility study to demonstrate basic safety and effectiveness of prostate artery embolization for the treatment of symptomatic benign pros...
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Trial With Dutasteride And Tamsulosin Combination Treatment
This study will investigate the efficacy and safety of treatment with dutasteride and tamsulosin, administered once daily for 4 years, alone and in combination, on the improvement of sympt...
Phase 2 Study of NX-1207 for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) (Enlarged Prostate)
This completed study evaluated the safety and efficacy of two dose levels of NX-1207 for the treatment of BPH (benign prostatic hyperplasia) versus finasteride.
Single arm, multi-center prospective clinical trial to determine the safety and effectiveness of the AQUABEAM System in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in men 45 to 80 ...
Cost-benefit Analysis
A method of comparing the cost of a program with its expected benefits in dollars (or other currency). The benefit-to-cost ratio is a measure of total return expected per unit of money spent. This analysis generally excludes consideration of factors that are not measured ultimately in economic terms. Cost effectiveness compares alternative ways to achieve a specific set of results.
Ultrasound, High-intensity Focused, Transrectal
Tissue ablation of the PROSTATE performed by ultrasound from a transducer placed in the RECTUM. The procedure is used to treat prostate cancer (PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS) and benign prostatic hypertrophy (PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA).
Disease Management
A broad approach to appropriate coordination of the entire disease treatment process that often involves shifting away from more expensive inpatient and acute care to areas such as preventive medicine, patient counseling and education, and outpatient care. This concept includes implications of appropriate versus inappropriate therapy on the overall cost and clinical outcome of a particular disease. (From Hosp Pharm 1995 Jul;30(7):596)
Drug Therapy, Combination
Therapy with two or more separate preparations given for a combined effect.
Cost Of Illness
The personal cost of acute or chronic disease. The cost to the patient may be an economic, social, or psychological cost or personal loss to self, family, or immediate community. The cost of illness may be reflected in absenteeism, productivity, response to treatment, peace of mind, QUALITY OF LIFE, etc. It differs from HEALTH CARE COSTS, meaning the societal cost of providing services related to the delivery of health care, rather than personal impact on individuals.