Advertisement

Topics

Ten simple rules for writing statistical book reviews.

07:00 EST 24th January 2019 | BioPortfolio

Summary of "Ten simple rules for writing statistical book reviews."

Statistical books can provide deep insights into statistics and software. There are, however, many resources available to the practitioner. Book reviews have the capacity to function as a critical mechanism for the learner to assess the merits of engaging in part, in full, or at all with a book. The "ten simple rules" format, pioneered in computational biology, was applied here to writing effective book reviews for statistics because of the wide breadth of offerings in this domain, including topical introductions, computational solutions, and theory. Learning by doing is a popular paradigm in statistics and computation, but there is still a niche for books in the pedagogy of self-taught and instruction-based learning. Primarily, these rules ensure that book reviews function as a form of short syntheses to inform and guide readers in deciding to use a specific book relative to other options for resolving statistical challenges.

Affiliation

Journal Details

This article was published in the following journal.

Name: PLoS computational biology
ISSN: 1553-7358
Pages: e1006562

Links

DeepDyve research library

PubMed Articles [8607 Associated PubMed Articles listed on BioPortfolio]

Why Children With Dyslexia Struggle With Writing and How to Help Them.

Children with dyslexia often have related writing difficulties. In the simple view of writing model, high-quality writing depends on good transcription skills, working memory, and executive function-a...

Ten simple rules for carrying out and writing meta-analyses.

Ten simple rules for collaboratively writing a multi-authored paper.

Understanding the Motivation to Write Reviews for Mobile Apps among German Users: Testing the Expanded Theory of Planned Behavior Using a Structural Equation Modeling Approach.

Online reviews can make or break a mobile app. Various studies have shown that reviews, especially when their valence is primarily positive, can contribute to the survival of a particular app in a sti...

Writing in your own voice: An intervention that reduces plagiarism and common writing problems in students' scientific writing.

In many of our courses, particularly laboratory courses, students are expected to engage in scientific writing. Despite various efforts by other courses and library resources, as instructors we are of...

Clinical Trials [2115 Associated Clinical Trials listed on BioPortfolio]

Effect of Group Led Creative Writing on Mood in Cancer Patients

The primary purpose of this study is to determine whether creative writing in newly diagnosed cancer patients and those with recent progression in their disease will have a positive impact...

Expressive Writing for Reducing Stress and Diabetic Symptoms in Diabetes Patients

This study will determine whether the psychological benefits of expressive writing extend to diabetic patients, how long the benefits will last, and whether additional expressive writing "...

Prospective Validation and Comparison of Different Ultrasound Methods for Discrimination Between Benign and Malignant Ovarian/Tubal Masses Prior to Surgery

The ability of different methods to discriminate between benign and malignant adnexal masses has been compared in a meta-analysis showing that the IOTA Simple Rules and the IOTA logistic r...

Writing About Experiences and Health in Older Adults

UCLA researchers looking for healthy females (age 60+) to participate in a study investigating how writing about your experiences may be related to your health. Once a week for 6 weeks, p...

Writing About Experiences With Ovarian Cancer

This online study aims to understand whether writing about one's experiences with ovarian cancer may be beneficial for psychological and physical wellbeing in women with a history of ovari...

Medical and Biotech [MESH] Definitions

An article or book published after examination of published material on a subject. It may be comprehensive to various degrees and the time range of material scrutinized may be broad or narrow, but the reviews most often desired are reviews of the current literature. The textual material examined may be equally broad and can encompass, in medicine specifically, clinical material as well as experimental research or case reports. State-of-the-art reviews tend to address more current matters. A review of the literature must be differentiated from HISTORICAL ARTICLE on the same subject, but a review of historical literature is also within the scope of this publication type.

Critical analyses of books or other monographic works.

Works consisting of critical analyses of books or other monographic works.

The writing of history; the principles, theory, and history of historical writing; the product of historical writing. (Webster, 3d ed)

The practice of writing usually by a skilled or specialized writer focused on the reporting or dissemination of medical information for a target audience.

Advertisement
Quick Search
Advertisement
Advertisement

 


DeepDyve research library

Searches Linking to this Article