Advertisement

Topics

From the Editors.

07:00 EST 1st February 2019 | BioPortfolio

Summary of "From the Editors."

No Summary Available

Affiliation

Journal Details

This article was published in the following journal.

Name: Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis
ISSN: 1539-6924
Pages: 291-292

Links

DeepDyve research library

PubMed Articles [112 Associated PubMed Articles listed on BioPortfolio]

An adenine base editor with expanded targeting scope using SpCas9-NGv1 in rice.

The CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing system induces mainly small insertions or deletions at the target site. In contrast, base editors are precise genome editing tools that enable base conversion at a targe...

Industry payments to physician journal editors.

Open Payments is a United States federal program mandating reporting of medical industry payments to physicians, increasing transparency of physician conflicts of interest (COI). Study objectives were...

Publisher Correction: Base editing: precision chemistry on the genome and transcriptome of living cells.

The originally published article contained errors in reference numbering throughout table 1 (DNA base editors and their approximate editing windows) due to the unintended propagation of reference numb...

Editors' Note.

Editors' Note.

Clinical Trials [2 Associated Clinical Trials listed on BioPortfolio]

Production of Clinical-grade Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells for Refractory B-cell Malignancies

Immunotherapy is a promising therapeutic approach for patients with cancers. Patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) experiencing early relapse less than 18 months from diagnosis ...

Make a Journal Feel as if it Was Mailed Back From the Future

Optimal patient care hinges on physicians remaining up to date with developing medical knowledge. With ever increasing clinical demands however, the ability of physicians to do this is co...

Medical and Biotech [MESH] Definitions

The influence of study results on the chances of publication and the tendency of investigators, reviewers, and editors to submit or accept manuscripts for publication based on the direction or strength of the study findings. Publication bias has an impact on the interpretation of clinical trials and meta-analyses. Bias can be minimized by insistence by editors on high-quality research, thorough literature reviews, acknowledgement of conflicts of interest, modification of peer review practices, etc.

"The business or profession of the commercial production and issuance of literature" (Webster's 3d). It includes the publisher, publication processes, editing and editors. Production may be by conventional printing methods or by electronic publishing.

Work consisting of a statement of the opinions, beliefs, and policy of the editor or publisher of a journal, usually on current matters of medical or scientific significance to the medical community or society at large. The editorials published by editors of journals representing the official organ of a society or organization are generally substantive.

The evaluation by experts of the quality and pertinence of research or research proposals of other experts in the same field. Peer review is used by editors in deciding which submissions warrant publication, by granting agencies to determine which proposals should be funded, and by academic institutions in tenure decisions.

An organized procedure carried out by a select committee of professionals in evaluating the performance of other professionals in meeting the standards of their specialty. Review by peers is used by editors in the evaluation of articles and other papers submitted for publication. Peer review is used also in the evaluation of grant applications. It is applied also in evaluating the quality of health care provided to patients.

Advertisement
Quick Search
Advertisement
Advertisement

 


DeepDyve research library

Searches Linking to this Article