The Value of Commission on Cancer Accreditation: Improving Survival Outcomes by Enhancing Compliance with Quality Measures.

08:00 EDT 29th March 2019 | BioPortfolio

Summary of "The Value of Commission on Cancer Accreditation: Improving Survival Outcomes by Enhancing Compliance with Quality Measures."

No Summary Available


Journal Details

This article was published in the following journal.

Name: Annals of surgical oncology
ISSN: 1534-4681


DeepDyve research library

PubMed Articles [21654 Associated PubMed Articles listed on BioPortfolio]

Impact of Breast Center Accreditation on Compliance with Breast Quality Performance Measures at Commission on Cancer-Accredited Centers.

This study was designed to determine whether accreditation by the National Accreditation Program for Breast Centers (NAPBC) is associated with improved performance on six breast quality measures perta...

Evaluation of Access to Hospitals Most Ready to Achieve National Accreditation for Rectal Cancer Treatment.

The American College of Surgeons National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer (NAPRC) promotes multidisciplinary care to improve oncologic outcomes in rectal cancer. However, accreditation require...

Survival before and after direct surgical quality feedback in a population-based lung cancer cohort.

Surgical resection is the main curative modality for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but variation in the quality of care contributes to sub-optimal survival rates. Improving surgical outcomes by ...

Compliance with Cancer Quality Measures Over Time and Their Association with Survival Outcomes: The Commission on Cancer's Experience with the Quality Measure Requiring at Least 12 Regional Lymph Nodes to be Removed and Analyzed with Colon Cancer Resections.

Many quality measures in cancer care are process measures. The rates of compliance for these measures over time have not been well described, and the relationships between measure compliance and survi...

Screening for psychosocial distress among patients with cancer: implications for clinical practice, healthcare policy, and dissemination to enhance cancer survivorship.

Accreditation standards are at the forefront of evolving healthcare systems, setting metrics for high-quality care. Healthcare outcomes (health, experience, cost, provider satisfaction/burn out) are b...

Clinical Trials [15480 Associated Clinical Trials listed on BioPortfolio]

The Effectiveness of a Nationwide Mandatory Accreditation in General Practice in Denmark

Accreditation is used increasingly in health systems worldwide. However, there is a lack of evidence of the effectiveness of accreditation. The overall aim of this study is to evaluate the...

Enhancing Connections Program in Improving Communication Between Patients With Incurable Cancer and Their Children

This pilot clinical trial studies the use of the Enhancing Connections Program in improving communication between patients with incurable cancer and their children. The Enhancing Connectio...

Enhancing Connections Program in Improving Family Adjustment in Patients With Incurable Cancer

This pilot clinical trial studies how well the Enhancing Connections program improves family adjustment in patients with incurable cancer. Participating in an educational program with a co...

Evaluation Research of a National Accreditation and Improvement Programme for General Practice

Objective: This study aims to determine the effectiveness and efficiency of a national accreditation and improvement programme for general practice, focusing on patients with established c...

Pre-operative Chemotherapy Versus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in N2 Positive IIIA Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

It is suggested that a bimodal or trimodal approach combining neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy followed by surgery provides a potentially superior method of enhancing ...

Medical and Biotech [MESH] Definitions

A private, voluntary, not-for-profit organization which establishes standards for the operation of health facilities and services, conducts surveys, and awards accreditation.

The Commission was created by the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 under Title XVIII. It is specifically charged to review the effect of Medicare+Choice under Medicare Part C and to review payment policies under Parts A and B. It is also generally charged to evaluate the effect of prospective payment policies and their impact on health care delivery in the US. The former Prospective Payment Assessment Commission (ProPAC) and the Physician Payment Review Commission (PPRC) were merged to form MEDPAC.

The non-profit, non-governmental organization which collects, processes, and distributes data on hospital use. Two programs of the Commission are the Professional Activity Study and the Medical Audit Program.

The survival of a graft in a host, the factors responsible for the survival and the changes occurring within the graft during growth in the host.

Persons who have experienced prolonged survival with or the following neoplastic disease and the impact of the disease on the individual, family members, and significant others.

Quick Search


DeepDyve research library

Relevant Topic

  Bladder Cancer Brain Cancer Breast Cancer Cancer Cervical Cancer Colorectal Head & Neck Cancers Hodgkin Lymphoma Leukemia Lung Cancer Melanoma Myeloma Ovarian Cancer Pancreatic Cancer ...

Searches Linking to this Article