Evaluation of implementation outcomes after initiation of a shared decision-making program for men with prostate cancer.

08:00 EDT 9th July 2019 | BioPortfolio

Summary of "Evaluation of implementation outcomes after initiation of a shared decision-making program for men with prostate cancer."

To evaluate barriers to implementation of patient decision aids (PDAs) issued in an electronic medical record (EMR). We undertook an implementation outcomes analysis focused on what proportion of men eligible for the PDA received it (penetration), and of the men who received it, how many used it as intended (fidelity). We also evaluated various patient centered outcomes related to decision making.


Journal Details

This article was published in the following journal.

Name: Urology
ISSN: 1527-9995


DeepDyve research library

PubMed Articles [13941 Associated PubMed Articles listed on BioPortfolio]

Adaptation and qualitative evaluation of encounter decision aids in breast cancer care.

Shared decision-making is currently not widely implemented in breast cancer care. Encounter decision aids support shared decision-making by helping patients and physicians compare treatment options. S...

Who is the patient? Tensions between advance care planning and shared decision-making.

Shared decision-making takes many forms, involving different kinds of agents who share the requirement that they must have sufficient decision-making capacity for the decision in question. Advance car...

Shared Decision-Making Framework for Pelvic Examinations in Asymptomatic, Nonpregnant Patients.

Controversy exists regarding whether to perform pelvic examinations for asymptomatic, nonpregnant patients. However, several professional organizations support the notion that health care providers sh...

Shared decision-making in orthodontics: Are we there yet?

Shared decision-making (SDM) is the process of making decisions 'with' rather than 'about' patients. This review outlines key stages of SDM, discusses some of the main barriers to SDM and identifies a...

Strategies to evaluate healthcare provider trainings in shared decision-making (SDM): a systematic review of evaluation studies.

We performed a systematic review of studies evaluating healthcare provider (HCP) trainings in shared decision-making (SDM) to analyse their evaluation strategies.

Clinical Trials [6146 Associated Clinical Trials listed on BioPortfolio]

Shared Medical Decision Making in the Prophylactic Treatment of Bipolar Disorder

The investigators hypothesize that implementation of a shared decision making care plan for prophylactic treatment will help therapeutic adherence of bipolar patients. They also anticipate...

Implementation of Shared Decision-Making in Cancer Care

This study aims to evaluate a theoretically and empirically grounded implementation program designed to foster shared decision-making in routine cancer care. The intervention program consi...

Evaluation of a Web-based Decision Aid Tool for Prostate Cancer Patients

Patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer may be eligible for different treatment options. MAASTRO Clinic (MAAStricht Radiation Oncology) developed a web-based decision aid tool fo...

Shared Decision Making to Improve Goals of Care in the ED

This project will develop and refine a shared decision making (SDM) intervention (decision aid tool) to improve and normalize high quality end of life discussions in the Emergency Departme...

Checklist-guided Shared Decision-making for Code Status Discussions in Medical Inpatients.

This cluster-randomized, multicenter trial is designed to investigate the effect of checklist-guided shared decision-making including decision aids and communication of expected outcome on...

Medical and Biotech [MESH] Definitions

Mathematical or statistical procedures used as aids in making a decision. They are frequently used in medical decision-making.

Use of an interactive computer system designed to assist the physician or other health professional in choosing between certain relationships or variables for the purpose of making a diagnostic or therapeutic decision.

A scenario in decision analysis in which two individuals motivated entirely by self-preservation at the expense of the other, end up in a worse state than if they had cooperated with each other in the decision-making process.

The process of making a selective intellectual judgment when presented with several complex alternatives consisting of several variables, and usually defining a course of action or an idea.

Computer-based information systems used to integrate clinical and patient information and provide support for decision-making in patient care.

Quick Search


DeepDyve research library

Searches Linking to this Article