Veracity in the Review Process.

08:00 EDT 1st October 2019 | BioPortfolio

Summary of "Veracity in the Review Process."

No Summary Available


Journal Details

This article was published in the following journal.

Name: Headache
ISSN: 1526-4610
Pages: 1429-1433


DeepDyve research library

PubMed Articles [17037 Associated PubMed Articles listed on BioPortfolio]

Bias in the Peer Review Process: Can We Do Better?

Peer review is the major method used by the scientific community to evaluate manuscripts and decide what is suitable for publication. However, this process in its current design is not bulletproof and...

Everything You Need to Know About Satisfying IACUC Protocol Requirements.

There have been recent efforts to reduce the administrative burden imposed on investigators. Although a complete and thorough review of proposed animal studies is an essential function of the Institut...

The James Lind Alliance process approach: scoping review.

To summarise study descriptions of the James Lind Alliance (JLA) approach to the priority setting partnership (PSP) process and how this process is used to identify uncertainties and to develop lists ...

A systematic review: characteristics, complications and treatment of spondylodiscitis.

This systematic review focuses on 5 key elements that may improve the decision-making process in spondylodiscitis: the infective agent, segmental instability, abscess development, neurological comprom...

Impact of Peer Review in the Radiation Treatment Planning Process: Experience of a Tertiary Care University Hospital in Pakistan.

To evaluate and report the frequency of changes in radiation therapy treatment plans after peer review in a simulation review meeting once a week.

Clinical Trials [2932 Associated Clinical Trials listed on BioPortfolio]

Adaptation Process of Patient-Reported Outcomes, an eVALuation Study

Objectives: To identify the respective contributions of back-translations and of the expert committee in the process of cultural adaptation of patient reported outcome with an experimental...

Perceptions of the Annual Review of Competence Progression (ARCP) in Surgical Training in the UK and Ireland

A Prospective Cross Sectional Questionnaire Study was conducted to evaluate surgical trainees' experiences of the ARCP process in order to identify areas for improvement.

A Study to Compare the Pharmacokinetics of Belatacept Using Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient Manufactured by Process E Relative to Process C

The purpose of the study is to compare the Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Process E belatacept relative to Process C belatacept in Healthy subjects

Implementation of a Computer-based Questionnaire for Preoperative Evaluation in Anesthesia Ambulance

Preanesthetic evaluation is a clinical assessment process with purpose of increased patient safety. One focus is review of patient medical history to reduce perioperative morbidity and mor...

A Task Analysis Study of DECIDE For African American Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

The DECIDE program is a problem-solving curriculum used to help manage everyday problems when living with diabetes. The purpose of this project is to complete an in-depth review of the Dec...

Medical and Biotech [MESH] Definitions

Review of the medical necessity of hospital or other health facility admissions, upon or within a short time following an admission, and periodic review of services provided during the course of treatment.

Formal programs for assessing drug prescription against some standard. Drug utilization review may consider clinical appropriateness, cost effectiveness, and, in some cases, outcomes. Review is usually retrospective, but some analysis may be done before drugs are dispensed (as in computer systems which advise physicians when prescriptions are entered). Drug utilization review is mandated for Medicaid programs beginning in 1993.

Organizations representing designated geographic areas which have contracts under the PRO program to review the medical necessity, appropriateness, quality, and cost-effectiveness of care received by Medicare beneficiaries. Peer Review Improvement Act, PL 97-248, 1982.

A formal process of examination of patient care or research proposals for conformity with ethical standards. The review is usually conducted by an organized clinical or research ethics committee (CLINICAL ETHICS COMMITTEES or RESEARCH ETHICS COMMITTEES), sometimes by a subset of such a committee, an ad hoc group, or an individual ethicist (ETHICISTS).

Published materials which provide an examination of recent or current literature. Review articles can cover a wide range of subject matter at various levels of completeness and comprehensiveness based on analyses of literature that may include research findings. The review may reflect the state of the art. It also includes reviews as a literary form.

Quick Search

DeepDyve research library

Searches Linking to this Article