Topics

Identifying publications in questionable journals in the context of performance-based research funding.

07:00 EST 8th November 2019 | BioPortfolio

Summary of "Identifying publications in questionable journals in the context of performance-based research funding."

In this article we discuss the five yearly screenings for publications in questionable journals which have been carried out in the context of the performance-based research funding model in Flanders, Belgium. The Flemish funding model expanded from 2010 onwards, with a comprehensive bibliographic database for research output in the social sciences and humanities. Along with an overview of the procedures followed during the screenings for articles in questionable journals submitted for inclusion in this database, we present a bibliographic analysis of the publications identified. First, we show how the yearly number of publications in questionable journals has evolved over the period 2003-2016. Second, we present a disciplinary classification of the identified journals. In the third part of the results section, three authorship characteristics are discussed: multi-authorship, the seniority-or experience level-of authors in general and of the first author in particular, and the relation of the disciplinary scope of the journal (cognitive classification) with the departmental affiliation of the authors (organizational classification). Our results regarding yearly rates of publications in questionable journals indicate that awareness of the risks of questionable journals does not lead to a turn away from open access in general. The number of publications in open access journals rises every year, while the number of publications in questionable journals decreases from 2012 onwards. We find further that both early career and more senior researchers publish in questionable journals. We show that the average proportion of senior authors contributing to publications in questionable journals is somewhat higher than that for publications in open access journals. In addition, this paper yields insight into the extent to which publications in questionable journals pose a threat to the public and political legitimacy of a performance-based research funding system of a western European region. We include concrete suggestions for those tasked with maintaining bibliographic databases and screening for publications in questionable journals.

Affiliation

Journal Details

This article was published in the following journal.

Name: PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Pages: e0224541

Links

DeepDyve research library

PubMed Articles [36490 Associated PubMed Articles listed on BioPortfolio]

Assessing and Raising Concerns About Duplicate Publication, Authorship Transgressions and Data Errors in a Body of Preclinical Research.

Authorship transgressions, duplicate data reporting and reporting/data errors compromise the integrity of biomedical publications. Using a standardized template, we raised concerns with journals about...

Plagiarism in Predatory Publications: A Comparative Study of Three Nursing Journals.

This study compared three known predatory nursing journals to determine the percentage of content among them that was plagiarized or duplicated. A serendipitous finding of several instances of plagiar...

Journals' instructions to authors: A cross-sectional study across scientific disciplines.

In light of increasing calls for transparent reporting of research and prevention of detrimental research practices, we conducted a cross-sectional machine-assisted analysis of a representative sample...

Open access availability of Catalonia research output: Case analysis of the CERCA institution, 2011-2015.

The open access availability of publications by Catalonia's CERCA research centres was analysed to determine the extent to which authors use open access journals, repositories, social networks and oth...

Factors affecting global flow of scientific knowledge in environmental sciences.

Here we present our view on the current Open Access debate, predatory journals and the on-going publication and promotion strategy of some countries and research institutions. We urge the world's rese...

Clinical Trials [12012 Associated Clinical Trials listed on BioPortfolio]

One Year Clinical Evaluation of Pressed BioHPP Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK)-Based Versus Zirconia-Based Single Crowns

The clinical performance (using the modified Ryge criteria) and patient satisfaction ( using VAS questionnaire) of pressed BioHPP PEEK based posterior single crowns compared to zirconia ba...

Evaluating the Impact of Assessing During Peer Review the CONSORT Checklist Submitted by Authors

Randomised trials are considered the gold standard in medical research. The CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) Statement aims to improve the quality of reporting of rando...

Assessing the Ability of the T-SPOT®.TB Test

The primary objective of this clinical research study is to demonstrate performance of the normalized TB specific lymphocyte response in identifying patients with active TB disease. The se...

Assessing the Ability of the T-SPOT®.TB Test (IQ)

The primary objective of this clinical research study is to demonstrate performance of the normalized TB specific lymphocyte response (NTBSLR) in identifying patients with active TB diseas...

Worldwide Therapeutic Embolization Cohort Post Market Registry

The purpose of this cohort post market registry is to collect data and create a global database on use of embolization devices and embolization procedures outcome. The data collected in th...

Medical and Biotech [MESH] Definitions

Work consisting of reports by the United States Office of Research Integrity, identifying questionable research published in articles or books. Notification of the questionable data is carried in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts.

A designation for publications of research resulting from extramural research funded by the National Institutes of Health.

A designation for publications of research resulting from intramural research at the National Institutes of Health.

The means of interchanging or transmitting and receiving information. Historically the media were written: books, journals, newspapers, and other publications; in the modern age the media include, in addition, radio, television, computers, and information networks.

System through which research and other scholarly writings are created, evaluated for quality, disseminated to the scholarly community, and preserved for future use. It includes both formal means of communication, such as publication in peer-reviewed journals, and informal channels, such as electronic listservs. (from Association of College & Research Libraries, “Principles and Strategies for the Reform of Scholarly Communication 1,” 2003)

Quick Search


DeepDyve research library

Searches Linking to this Article