No Summary Available
This article was published in the following journal.
Name: Blood purification
ISSN: 1421-9735
Pages: 385-386
Acknowledgement to our reviewers.
Acknowledgement to the Reviewers.
Correction to: Molecular mapping of a novel male-sterile gene ms in soybean Glycine max (L.) Merr..
The Acknowledgement section of the original publication gave a wrong grant number. The correct Acknowledgement should read.
A Shorter Invitation Period for Manuscript Reviewers: Impact on Time to Completion of Reviews.
The objective of this article was to study the effect of decreasing the time allowed an () reviewer to consider an invitation to review on time for two invitees to accept an invitation and time for b...
Community Members as Reviewers of Medical Journal Manuscripts
Manuscripts submitted to medical journals are typically reviewed by physicians or researchers, with no input from patients or other community members. However, involvement of community mem...
Web-based Tool to Improve the Assessment of Reporting (COBPeer)
The peer review process is a cornerstone of biomedical research publication. Despite being essential, the assessment of the completeness of the reporting and the identification of switched...
Testing for the Presence of Authorship Bias in Peer Review
No consensus exists among biomedical journals on the subject of blinding during the peer review process. Some journals attempt to remove all identifiers of authorship from potential manusc...
Psychosocial Intervention in Latino Patients With Advanced Cancer
Palliative Care focuses on symptom management and quality of life and helps patients with life-limiting illness match goals and preferences for care. While there has been interest in and a...
Anesthesia Lumbar Puncture In Children
The study is carried out in a prospectively randomly controlled way. In the context of acknowledgement and understanding from parents, by comparing with traditional process(no anesthesia),...
Publication Bias
The influence of study results on the chances of publication and the tendency of investigators, reviewers, and editors to submit or accept manuscripts for publication based on the direction or strength of the study findings. Publication bias has an impact on the interpretation of clinical trials and meta-analyses. Bias can be minimized by insistence by editors on high-quality research, thorough literature reviews, acknowledgement of conflicts of interest, modification of peer review practices, etc.
Quick Links
Advanced Search |
Login |
Subscribe |
RSS