Track topics on Twitter Track topics that are important to you
No Summary Available
This article was published in the following journal.
The purpose of this study was to assess the natural course of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) and to determine the predictive abilities of preprocedural high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP)...
The objective of this article was to study the effect of decreasing the time allowed an () reviewer to consider an invitation to review on time for two invitees to accept an invitation and time for b...
The benefits of the right transradial approach for anterior circulation lesions with a 6-Fr Simmonds guiding sheath have been reported; however, this technique was anatomically challenging in type I a...
Automated approaches to improve the efficiency of systematic reviews are greatly needed. When testing any of these approaches, the criterion standard of comparison (gold standard) is usually human rev...
The peer review of completed Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) funded research includes reviews from patient reviewers (patients, caregivers, and patient advocates). Very little is ...
Manuscripts submitted to medical journals are typically reviewed by physicians or researchers, with no input from patients or other community members. However, involvement of community mem...
The peer review process is a cornerstone of biomedical research publication. Despite being essential, the assessment of the completeness of the reporting and the identification of switched...
No consensus exists among biomedical journals on the subject of blinding during the peer review process. Some journals attempt to remove all identifiers of authorship from potential manusc...
This purpose study is to demonstrate the safety and performance of the DAISe System used to remove clot in the brain during a stroke. This study will assess how well the device removes clo...
This study is to find a more effective treatment for itchy, painful or unsightly dermatofibromas, that will improve symptoms of itch and/or pain and/or improve the appearance of dermatofib...
The influence of study results on the chances of publication and the tendency of investigators, reviewers, and editors to submit or accept manuscripts for publication based on the direction or strength of the study findings. Publication bias has an impact on the interpretation of clinical trials and meta-analyses. Bias can be minimized by insistence by editors on high-quality research, thorough literature reviews, acknowledgement of conflicts of interest, modification of peer review practices, etc.