Topics

Correction: Relationship between Research Outcomes and Risk of Bias, Study Sponsorship, and Author Financial Conflicts of Interest in Reviews of the Effects of Artificially Sweetened Beverages on Weight Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Reviews.

08:00 EDT 10th March 2020 | BioPortfolio

Summary of "Correction: Relationship between Research Outcomes and Risk of Bias, Study Sponsorship, and Author Financial Conflicts of Interest in Reviews of the Effects of Artificially Sweetened Beverages on Weight Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Reviews."

[This corrects the article
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0162198.].

Affiliation

Journal Details

This article was published in the following journal.

Name: PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Pages: e0230469

Links

DeepDyve research library

PubMed Articles [44864 Associated PubMed Articles listed on BioPortfolio]

Comparison of bias adjustment methods in meta-analysis suggests that quality effects modelling may have less limitations than other approaches.

The quality of primary research is commonly assessed prior to inclusion in meta-analyses. Findings are discussed in the context of the quality appraisal by categorising studies according to risk of bi...

Force perceptual bias caused by muscle activity in unimanual steering.

This study sought to investigate whether force perceptual bias was affected by differences in posture while steering an automobile using a psychophysical experiment to examine the relationship with mu...

Attention bias towards threat in African American children exposed to early life trauma.

Attentional bias is linked to a range of mood disorders, including posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The present study examined attention bias patterns in African American children exposed to trau...

External factors may influence Cochrane reviewers when classifying the risk of bias of original reports.

To explore contextual factors associated with high or low risk of bias judgement in case of incomplete or unclear information in study reports.

Ten questions to consider when interpreting results of a meta-epidemiological study - the MetaBLIND study as a case.

Randomized clinical trials underpin evidence-based clinical practice, but flaws in their conduct may lead to biased estimates of intervention effects and hence invalid treatment recommendations. The m...

Clinical Trials [13093 Associated Clinical Trials listed on BioPortfolio]

Comparison of Different Surgical Treatments for Severe Ptosis Correction

Main research purposes of this research is to compare the therapeutic effect and safety of the superior levator muscle shortening combined with the tarsus resection and the traditional fro...

Efficacy of Cognitive Bias Modification in Residential Treatment for Addiction

The purpose of this study is to determine whether computer bias modification for interpretation bias (CBM-I) is effective in the reduction of suicidal ideation in substance use disorders.

REACH Implicit Bias Training Project

The overall goal and theme of the Duke Center for Research to Advance Equity in Healthcare is to reduce racial and ethnic disparities in health through interventions that affect the clinic...

Attention-Bias Modification Treatment for PTSD

Emerging research implicates biased attention to threat in the pathophysiology of anxiety disorders. Recent findings demonstrate significant associations between attention bias and stress ...

A Smartphone Based Intervention for the Prevention of Relapse in Alcohol Dependence

The rate of relapse following an inpatient alcohol rehabilitation program has been around 50% for a number of years. Offered treatments mainly focus on conscious and controllable aspects o...

Medical and Biotech [MESH] Definitions

The influence of study results on the chances of publication and the tendency of investigators, reviewers, and editors to submit or accept manuscripts for publication based on the direction or strength of the study findings. Publication bias has an impact on the interpretation of clinical trials and meta-analyses. Bias can be minimized by insistence by editors on high-quality research, thorough literature reviews, acknowledgement of conflicts of interest, modification of peer review practices, etc.

Any deviation of results or inferences from the truth, or processes leading to such deviation. Bias can result from several sources: one-sided or systematic variations in measurement from the true value (systematic error); flaws in study design; deviation of inferences, interpretations, or analyses based on flawed data or data collection; etc. There is no sense of prejudice or subjectivity implied in the assessment of bias under these conditions.

Any deviation of results or inferences from the truth, or processes leading to such deviation. Bias can result from several sources: one-sided or systematic variations in measurement from the true value (systematic error); flaws in study design; deviation of inferences, interpretations, or analyses based on flawed data or data collection; etc. There is no sense of prejudice or subjectivity implied in the assessment of bias under these conditions.

The introduction of error due to systematic differences in the characteristics between those selected and those not selected for a given study. In sampling bias, error is the result of failure to ensure that all members of the reference population have a known chance of selection in the sample.

Adverse of favorable selection bias exhibited by insurers or enrollees resulting in disproportionate enrollment of certain groups of people.

Quick Search


DeepDyve research library

Searches Linking to this Article