Track topics on Twitter Track topics that are important to you
The purpose of this study is to determine if taking Asacol once a day is as effective as taking Asacol twice or three times a day in keeping ulcerative colitis inactive, and to determine which dosing regimen is easiest to follow. Once daily dosing of Asacol is experimental, and has not been approved by the FDA. Dosing as three times daily is FDA approved.
This research is being done because the researchers want to learn what the best methods are for keeping ulcerative colitis inactive, and which way of taking Asacol is most helpful to subjects in continuing to take a medication to control their ulcerative colitis.
Hypothesis: Asacol taken once a day is equally effective (non-inferior) as conventional (twice or three times a day) dosing at maintaining remission in quiescent ulcerative colitis.
1. To assess the efficacy of once daily Asacol in the short and long-term maintenance of remission in quiescent ulcerative colitis.
2. To assess the medication consumption rate (adherence) in patients prescribed once daily Asacol compared to a bid or tid regimen.
Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an idiopathic, chronic inflammatory disease of the large intestine characterized by episodes of relapse and remission. Relapses are often not predictable, although factors such as smoking cessation, chronic non-steroidal antiinflammatory use and psychological stress are thought to cause symptom exacerbation in some individuals.
Multiple studies have demonstrated the efficacy of aminosalicylates to induce and maintain remission in UC. Because of its chronic nature, therapy often must continue on an indefinite basis. Many patients openly admit they do not take their medications as prescribed; medication-taking probably makes patients more uncomfortably aware of their chronic illness status, they have a fear of long-term side effects from medications, and they question the need for medication in the setting of quiescent disease.
Previous work done at the University of Chicago demonstrated that using objective pharmacy data, rather than patient-derived information, the prevalence of medication non-adherence was 60% in patients with quiescent UC. The average amount of medication consumed was 70% of that prescribed. In a prospective study, those patients non-adherent with medications had a higher risk of relapse than those who consumed greater than 75% of their prescribed regimen.
It is difficult to get patients to take medication when they feel well, because the rationale for continued use remains unclear to them. The long-term goals of improving adherence are to reduce frequency of relapse, lower the incidence of long-term complications (i.e. colon cancer), and lower overall health costs. Making a regimen easy for patients is a key factor in increasing adherence.
Hussain recently showed that in normal subjects, median peak concentrations, trough concentrations and areas under the curve were similar for Asacol consumed either as a once or three times daily dosing regimen. Twenty-four hour urinary and fecal excretions, total recovery, and rectal tissue concentrations also were similar in both groups. The authors concluded that the steady-state pharmacokinetics of delayed-release Asacol was similar whether the drug was administered in three divided doses throughout the day or as a single daily dose.
There are data to suggest that the motility and function of the colon in patients with quiescent ulcerative colitis is similar to that of normal subjects. If this is indeed the case, then the pharmacokinetics of Asacol should mimic those of healthy controls. In a small pilot study, we were able to show that in a 6-month time, patients were no more likely to experience a flare of their disease and actually consumed more medication in a once daily regimen than in a standard regimen. The aim of this study is to test this hypothesis in a larger number of patients, and assess the efficacy of once daily Asacol in patients with quiescent ulcerative colitis compared to a twice or three times daily regimen. In addition, we wish to compare the rates of medication consumption between groups over a prolonged period of time.
Patients eligible will be asked to sign informed consent prior to participation. As part of the consent process, the phone number of the patient pharmacy will be collected. Patients will then be randomized to one of two groups: once daily or usual (twice daily or three times daily) therapy. Assignment will be via the use of opaque sealed envelopes, containing assignment based on a randomization table. Once enrolled, each patient will be assigned a study number, which will be used on the questionnaires to maintain confidentiality. The patients will be instructed to conceal their regimen from any research investigator.
Patients will be followed prospectively and assessed at 3 month intervals from enrollment. The three and nine-month follow up will be via phone contact by one of the study nurses. Disease assessment and quality of life will be obtained by the nurse in a standard fashion. At time intervals 6 and 12 months, patients will be assessed during a scheduled clinic visit, using the same assessment tools along with a physical exam. These visits will not be additional or extra visits, but part of standard of care for ulcerative colitis. There will be no additional blood draws or endoscopy as part of the protocol, lab work and endoscopy for patient care as determined by each treating physician will be documented.
Medication consumption rates at months 3, 6, 9 and 12 will be calculated using pharmacy data as obtained by telephone by the PI and the validated formula as described by Steiner and colleagues. The end point of the study is disease relapse or the 12-month study period. An investigator blinded to the treatment regimen will assess the outcomes and medication consumption rates for each group. Patients experiencing a flare during the study period will be treated as deemed necessary by their treating physician.
Allocation: Randomized, Control: Active Control, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Single Blind, Primary Purpose: Prevention
The University of Chicago
University of Chicago
Published on BioPortfolio: 2014-08-27T03:43:50-0400
A Double-blind, Randomized, 6-week, Parallel-group Design Clinical trial to assess the Safety and Efficacy of Asacol 4.8 g/day (800 mg mesalamine tablet) versus Asacol 2.4 g/day (400 mg me...
The purpose of this randomized, open-label, parallel-group study is to determine how the body absorbs and eliminates mesalamine following administration of either 30 mg/kg/day, 60 mg/kg/da...
We, the investigators at University of Washington, plan on evaluating the effect of open label Asacol at a dose of 4.8 grams/day divided BID (twice per day) or TID (three times per day) on...
The objectives of this bioequivalence study in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) were: - To establish the therapeutic equivalence of mesalamine delayed release tablet (MDRT) a...
This study is a prospective clinical study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of two different doses of Asacol for the treatment of moderately active ulcerative colitis. In addition, a n...
Development of cardiac manifestations in patients diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease undergoing treatment with mesalamine is a rare. When this occurs, it can be difficult to tease out the prima...
Mesalamine is commonly used to treat ulcerative colitis (UC). Although mesalamine acts topically, in vitro data suggest that intracellular transport is required for its beneficial effect. Genetic vari...
Though proctitis is the most limited form of ulcerative colitis, it causes unpleasant symptoms. Topical mesalamine, the standard treatment, is not always effective. We conducted a randomized phase 2 t...
Health-Related Quality of Life and Work-Related Outcomes for Patients With Mild-to-Moderate Ulcerative Colitis and Remission Status Following Short-Term and Long-Term Treatment With Multimatrix Mesalamine: A Prospective, Open-Label Study.
Disease activity of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) predicts health-related quality of life (HRQL) and work-related outcomes (eg, absenteeism, productivity). We tested whether outcomes differed ...
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is commonly divided into 2 entities: Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Differentiating between these entities when dealing with IBD confined to the col...
Chronic, non-specific inflammation of the GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT. Etiology may be genetic or environmental. This term includes CROHN DISEASE and ULCERATIVE COLITIS.
Inflammation of the COLON that is predominantly confined to the MUCOSA. Its major symptoms include DIARRHEA, rectal BLEEDING, the passage of MUCUS, and ABDOMINAL PAIN.
An acute form of MEGACOLON, severe pathological dilatation of the COLON. It is associated with clinical conditions such as ULCERATIVE COLITIS; CROHN DISEASE; AMEBIC DYSENTERY; or CLOSTRIDIUM ENTEROCOLITIS.
A humanized monoclonal antibody that binds specifically to TNF-ALPHA and blocks its interaction with endogenous TNF RECEPTORS to modulate INFLAMMATION. It is used in the treatment of RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS; CROHN'S DISEASE and ULCERATIVE COLITIS.
A surgical procedure involving the excision of the COLON and RECTUM and the formation of an ILEOANAL RESERVOIR (pouch). In patients with intestinal diseases, such as ulcerative colitis, this procedure avoids the need for an OSTOMY by allowing for transanal defecation.