Track topics on Twitter Track topics that are important to you
Diabetes mellitus (DM) imposes a significant burden of early mortality and decreased quality of life on the 6% of Canadians affected by it. There is a growing body of research evidence showing that the use of certain medications (ACE inhibitors, blood pressure medications and cholesterol lowering agents) can reduce the major complications of diabetes such as heart, blood vessel and kidney disease and amputations. Unfortunately this research knowledge does not appear to be routinely translated into clinical practice. The proposed study examines the effect of simple mailed interventions to patients or physicians on improving the use of these therapies. The strategies to be tested are direct patient education with an emphasis on blood pressure and lipid control rather than use of particular drugs and, for physicians, the provision of confidential prescribing feedback together with targeted educational bulletins. With patient and physician consent, health care administrative data will be used to examine the impact of the interventions. If successful, the study will identify low cost reproducible interventions to promote the use of proven preventive therapies in clinical practice.
Preventing major complications is a cornerstone in the outpatient management of diabetes mellitus (DM). While glycaemic control remains important, recent evidence supports the role of blood pressure and lipids and the use of ACE inhibitors in reducing complications. Effective interventions are required to ensure implementation of these findings. Since optimal DM management involves the participation of both patients and providers, strategies to improve care can reasonably be directed toward either group.
The proposed study explores the impact of simple mailed interventions directed toward patients or providers on the rates of use of ACE inhibitors, Blood pressure lowering drugs and Cholesterol lowering therapies – the ABCs - by older patients with DM. We hypothesize that: 1) mailed interventions including prescriber feedback can increase the ABCs relative to controls; 2) that interventions directed toward patients and providers are equally effective in promoting the ABCs among patients selected to receive the intervention and 3) that interventions directed towards clusters of patients within a physician’s practice will also change the care provided by those physicians to their other patients, in the absence of any direct intervention to the physician.
Practices of 300 randomly selected primary care physicians in Ontario and, through their physicians, 10 patients over age 65 with known DM in each practice will be recruited to participate. Practices (physicians and their index patients) will be randomized to one of 3 arms: 1) physician intervention, 2) patient intervention or 3) control. In arm 1, participating physicians will receive confidential prescribing feedback on the ABCs and, as a masking intervention, patients will receive educational materials regarding DM eye care. In arm 2, patients will receive a mailed educational intervention regarding blood pressure and lipid control while physicians will receive education and feedback regarding eye care as a masking intervention. In arm 3, no educational intervention regarding hypertension and lipids will be provided and both patients and physicians will receive the eye care intervention. Data sources will be claims data from the Ontario Drug Benefit Program and the Ontario Health Insurance Plan and the Ontario Diabetes Database (a validated, linkable administrative data diabetes registry).
The primary outcomes will be the proportion of patients receiving ACE inhibitors, the proportion receiving 2 or more antihypertensive drugs and the proportion receiving lipid lowering drugs. All prescriptions received by the patient will be included whether or not written by the study physician. The unit of analysis will be the physician. Data will be analyzed in a multilevel logistic model with covariates measured at the physician level and outcomes measured at the patient level. The primary analysis will include only the data on index patients in each of the three arms. A secondary analysis will include all patients with diabetes over age 65 within the practices of the participating physicians. This project will further elucidate the role of prescribing feedback in guideline implementation and will explore a novel patient-based approach to improving the quality of diabetes care. The relative simplicity and the central administration of the proposed strategy suggest that, if effective, it could readily be widely implemented.
Allocation: Randomized, Control: Active Control, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Single Blind, Primary Purpose: Educational/Counseling/Training
Feedback and Education
Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences
Published on BioPortfolio: 2014-08-27T03:49:22-0400
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of a diabetes education program delivered to CHW in improving the metabolic control of patients with type 2 DM. The study is a randomized c...
The purpose of this study is to test whether providing personalized diabetes self-management recommendations and feedback improves blood sugar control more than providing generalized diabe...
The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to determine if greater effectiveness can be achieved by the addition of lay-led self-management patient education to regular professionally...
The purpose of this study is to determine whether giving women feedback concerning their bone mineral density, combined with either an information leaflet or group education concerning ost...
RATIONALE: Providing parent/caregivers of children with cancer with education and evidence of secondhand smoke exposure can protect the child from future exposure to tobacco smoke. PURPOS...
It is the position of American Association of Diabetes Educators (AADE) that all inpatient interdisciplinary teams include a diabetes educator to lead or support improvement efforts that affect patien...
Construct: Medical educators consider feedback a core component of the educational process. Effective feedback allows learners to acquire new skills, knowledge, and attitudes. Learners' perceptions of...
Diabetes complications can increase progressively, leading to morbidity and mortality among diabetes sufferers. To address this, diabetes self-management education is a strategy to increase patients' ...
We examined the effect of timing and type of feedback on medical students' knot-tying performance using visual versus auditory and immediate versus delayed feedback. We hypothesized that participants ...
Education is an important aspect of care for diabetic patients. This study aimed to compare the effect of education by health care provider and peer on self-care behaviors among Iranian patients with ...
A mechanism of communication with a physiological system for homeostasis, adaptation, etc. Physiological feedback is mediated through extensive feedback mechanisms that use physiological cues as feedback loop signals to control other systems.
Urination of a large volume of urine with an increase in urinary frequency, commonly seen in diabetes (DIABETES MELLITUS; DIABETES INSIPIDUS).
The time period before the development of symptomatic diabetes. For example, certain risk factors can be observed in subjects who subsequently develop INSULIN RESISTANCE as in type 2 diabetes (DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2).
A subclass of DIABETES MELLITUS that is not INSULIN-responsive or dependent (NIDDM). It is characterized initially by INSULIN RESISTANCE and HYPERINSULINEMIA; and eventually by GLUCOSE INTOLERANCE; HYPERGLYCEMIA; and overt diabetes. Type II diabetes mellitus is no longer considered a disease exclusively found in adults. Patients seldom develop KETOSIS but often exhibit OBESITY.
The state of PREGNANCY in women with DIABETES MELLITUS. This does not include either symptomatic diabetes or GLUCOSE INTOLERANCE induced by pregnancy (DIABETES, GESTATIONAL) which resolves at the end of pregnancy.