Advertisement

Topics

Prospective Randomized Evaluation of Antibiotic Regimen Following Appendectomy for Perforated Appendicitis

2014-08-27 03:49:54 | BioPortfolio

Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare traditional triple antibiotic therapy against dual single day dosing antibiotic therapy in the management of perforated appendicitis in children.

Description

Triple antibiotic therapy providing broad spectrum coverage of gram positive, gram negative and anaerobic bacteria has long been the standard treatment for perforated appendicitis in children. This regimen has traditionally consisted of ampicillin, gentamicin, and clindamycin. The dosing regimen for these medications are quite frequent, as follows: ampicillin (every 6 hours), gentamicin (every 8 hours), and clindamycin (every 8 hours), until there is no evidence for postoperative infection, usually 5 to 7 days. Further, gentamicin is an aminoglycoside with known renal and ototoxic side effects. Its therapeutic window is small necessitating measurement of serum levels to maintain therapeutic levels and avoid toxicity. The contemporary selection of antibiotics includes very few drugs that require such monitoring.

Monotherapy with newer broad-spectrum agents such as piperacillin/tazobactam for intraabdominal infections has recently been demonstrated to be equally efficacious as traditional triple therapy. Such data calls into question the need for such onerous antibiotic regimens which include a nephrotoxic agent (gentamycin). However, the benefits of monotherapy are outweighed by the increased expense of the antibiotic, and the ongoing cumbersome dosing schedule of 3-4 doses daily. We have recently moved to a dual antibiotic regimen (ceftriaxone and metronidazole) which provides excellent antimicrobial coverage and can be dosed on a once daily dosing schedule with an identical duration of therapy as for the triple antibiotic regimen. This regimen has proven effective in adults with intraabdominal infections such as perforated appendicitis. Further, ceftriaxone plus metronidazole has been shown equal to the aforementioned monotherapy schedule with piperacillin/tazobactam in children with complicated perforated appendicitis. The advantages of dual antibiotic therapy with once a day dosing for children with perforated appendicitis are immense, especially if the antibiotics are well tolerated, less expensive, and have a simple dosing schedule. Additionally, neither drug is nephrotoxic; both have broad therapeutic ranges and therefore require no serum level measurements. This translates into less blood draws, less time patients need to be receiving infusions, and less utilization of nursing resources. These advantages would be expected to culminate in greater nursing and patient satisfaction. The purpose of this study is to scientifically compare the traditional triple antibiotic regimen to dual antibiotic regimen for children with perforated appendicitis, quantify its significance, and report our findings to physicians caring for these children.

This will be a prospective randomized study involving children who undergo appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. All patients will receive antibiotics (ceftriaxone and flagyl) preoperatively. The determination of perforation will be made by the surgeon at the time of the operation. Perforation will be determined by either identifying a perforation in the appendix itself, or by identifying anaerobic odors emanating from the abdominal cavity during operation (sniff test). Once perforated appendicitis has been documented, the parents/guardians of the patient will be informed of the option to participate in the prospective randomized study. Patients whose parents agree and consent to enroll in the study will then be randomized to one of 2 groups based on a sequential randomization number created by Steve Simon, PhD.

Based on a power analysis of length of stay, performed by Dr. Simon, 50 patients in each of the two arms of the study will provide a power of 82% with an alpha level of 0.05. Dr. Simon feels that this level is appropriate for this study.

The control group will consist of triple antibiotic coverage with ampicillin 50mg/kg every 6 hours, gentamicin 2.5 mg/kg every 8 hours and clindamycin 10mg/kg every 6 hours, which are standard dosing regimens. The experimental group will receive ceftriaxone 50mg/kg once a day (maximum dose = 2 grams) and metronidazole 30mg/kg once a day (maximum dose = 1 gram) with once a day dosing for both. The length of antibiotic therapy will not differ from our standard management and will remain standardized in both arms. All patients will receive a minimum of 5 days of therapy (regardless of group randomization). At that time, if they have been afebrile for at least 24 hours, a white blood cell (WBC) count will be obtained, and if that is within normal limits, the antibiotics will be discontinued. If, after 5 days of therapy, the patient remains febrile, therapy will continue without change, unless cultures obtained from the febrile response indicate a need for antibiotic coverage change. If a change in antibiotic regimen is indicated, the antibiotic profile will be evaluated and the most appropriate antibiotic will be instituted. If this occurs, the patient's data will continue to be collected in an intention to treat analysis. In cases where there is no indication for a change in antibiotic regimen, a WBC count will be drawn once the patient has become and remains afebrile for a complete 24 hour period of time. If the WBC is elevated, the antibiotic course will continue with WBC counts to be drawn daily until normal values return. If leukocytosis or fever persists for 10 days, or if there is clinical indication of a postoperative intra-abdominal infection, a CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis will be performed to determine if a postoperative abscess has developed. Identification of a postoperative abscess will result in percutaneous drainage with culture and sensitivity of the abscess fluid. Subsequent antibiotic treatment will be based on the sensitivities obtained from the culture of the abscess. In these cases the patients’ data will be collected and they will be regarded as a failure of antibiotic therapy in the final analysis.

Parental permission and child assent, if the child is old enough, will be obtained (see attached form) and patients will be randomized to the control or experimental group based on a randomization number generated by Dr. Steve Simon, PhD. Patient demographics, operative approach, time to tolerating full feeds, length of hospitalization, infectious complications, medication charges, and hospital charges will be collected for comparison between the groups.

Study Design

Observational Model: Defined Population, Observational Model: Natural History, Time Perspective: Cross-Sectional, Time Perspective: Prospective

Conditions

Perforated Appendicitis

Intervention

Ampicillin, gentamicin, clindamycin, flagyl, ceftazidime

Location

The Children’s Mercy Hospital
Kansas CIty
Missouri
United States
64108

Status

Completed

Source

Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City

Results (where available)

View Results

Links

Published on BioPortfolio: 2014-08-27T03:49:54-0400

Clinical Trials [290 Associated Clinical Trials listed on BioPortfolio]

Treatment of Chorioamnionitis After Delivery

Chorioamnionitis occurs in 1% to 5% of term pregnancies and may complicate up to 25% of cases of preterm labor. The traditional regimen used to treat intra-amniotic infection is intraveno...

Antibiotic Safety (SCAMP)

The main purpose of this study is evaluate whether it is safe or not to use various combination of antibiotics (ampicillin, metronidazole, clindamycin, piperacillin-tazobactam, gentamicin)...

Intravenous Versus Intravenous/Oral Antibiotics for Perforated Appendicitis

The objective of this study is to scientifically evaluate two different management strategies for perforated appendicitis. The hypothesis is that early discharge with oral antibiotic ther...

Evaluation the Role of Laparoscopic Management of Perforated Appendicitis

A laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) was first reported by Semm in 1983. Since then, its advantages, such as the aesthetic appearance of the wound, less postoperative pain, and faster recovery...

Irrigation Versus No Irrigation for Perforated Appendicitis

The purpose is to quantify the effect of irrigation during laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis.

PubMed Articles [406 Associated PubMed Articles listed on BioPortfolio]

Infectious Complications After Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Pediatric Patients with Perforated Appendicitis: Is There a Difference in the Outcome Using Irrigation and Suction Versus Suction Only? Results of a Multicentric International Retrospective Study.

Analyzing the recent literature, it seems that the use of irrigation increases the incidence of intra-abdominal abscesses (IAAs) and infectious complications in perforated appendicitis. The aim of thi...

Perforated appendicitis in children: Antimicrobial susceptibility and antimicrobial stewardship.

For perforated appendicitis in children microbiological cultures should always be sought if adequate sample is available. Knowledge of local epidemiology is important for optimal selection of antimicr...

Home intravenous versus oral antibiotics following appendectomy for perforated appendicitis in children: a randomized controlled trial.

To compare the effect of home intravenous (IV) versus oral antibiotic therapy on complication rates and resource utilization following appendectomy for perforated appendicitis.

Outcomes of Transumbilical Laparoscopic-Assisted Appendectomy and Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Acute Pediatric Appendicitis in a Single Institution.

Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA) is a potentially safe and feasible alternative to conventional laparoscopic appendectomy using three ports (CLA). However, the safety and efficacy of S...

Appendiceal schwannoma: a rare cause of perforated appendicitis.

Medical and Biotech [MESH] Definitions

Acute inflammation of the APPENDIX. Acute appendicitis is classified as simple, gangrenous, or perforated.

An ester of AMPICILLIN which is readily hydrolysed on absorption to release ampicillin. It is well absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract resulting in a greater bioavailability of ampicillin than can be achieved with equivalent doses of ampicillin.

Antibiotic produced by Micromonospora inyoensis. It is closely related to gentamicin C1A, one of the components of the gentamicin complex (GENTAMICINS).

A genus of gram-negative, anaerobic bacteria in the family Desulfovibrionaceae. It was originally recovered from infections in patients with gangrenous and PERFORATED APPENDICITIS. It is also associated with ABSCESS; BACTEREMIA; and BILIARY TRACT sepsis.

Nonsusceptibility of a microbe to the action of ampicillin, a penicillin derivative that interferes with cell wall synthesis.

More From BioPortfolio on "Prospective Randomized Evaluation of Antibiotic Regimen Following Appendectomy for Perforated Appendicitis"

Advertisement
Quick Search
Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Relevant Topics

Pediatrics
Pediatrics is the general medicine of childhood. Because of the developmental processes (psychological and physical) of childhood, the involvement of parents, and the social management of conditions at home and at school, pediatrics is a specialty. With ...

Infectious-diseases
Antiretroviral Therapy Clostridium Difficile Ebola HIV & AIDS Infectious Diseases Influenza Malaria Measles Sepsis Swine Flu Tropical Medicine Tuberculosis Infectious diseases are caused by pathogenic...


Searches Linking to this Trial