Advertisement

Topics

Impact of a Limitation Section on the Meta-analysis Results' Interpretation

2014-08-27 04:00:42 | BioPortfolio

Summary

Objective: The investigators aim to evaluate the impact of a " limitations " section in systematic review's abstract on results' interpretation by readers.

Design: Randomized ratio 1:1 controlled trial with two parallel arms. Participants will be invited to participate in an online survey.

Participants: Eligible participants are corresponding authors of randomized controlled trial published between 2010 and 2012 and referenced in pubmed Intervention: The investigators will evaluate the impact of the presence of a " limitations " section in abstract of systematic review with meta-analysis. The investigators selected abstracts of meta-analysis published in the journal Annals of Internal Medicine between 2006 and 2011.

Selected abstract will be standardised and the treatment's name hidden. The two groups of abstract will be presented as follow: 1) abstract with " limitations " section and 2) abstract without " limitations " section: the " limitations " section of the original abstract will be deleted.

Selected participants are invited by e-mail to answer the survey. After reading one abstract from his group a randomization they are invited two answer 5 questions about their interpretation of the meta-analysis's results.

Description

OBJECTIVE The aim of the study is to evaluate the impact of a " limitations " section in systematic review's abstract on results' interpretation by readers.

STUDY DESIGN The study is a randomized controlled trial with two parallel arms. The study follows the CONSORT 2010 statements Participant will be invited to participate in an on-line survey with a secured web site. Participants, after a characteristic description will be randomized in one of the two arms: 1) abstract with a " limitations " section 2) abstract without a " limitations " section.

ELIGIBILITY Eligible participants are corresponding authors of randomized trials published between 2010 and 2012 and referenced in pubmed core set journal

INTERVENTION We will evaluate the impact of the presence of a " limitations " section in abstract of systematic review with meta-analysis.

SELECTION OF ABSTRACTS We will retrieve all systematic review with meta-analysis published in the journals Annals of Internal Medicine between the years 2006 and 2012, about health care intervention with a conclusion in favor the experimental treatment or intervention. We exclude updates, diagnostical, genetical, epidemiological or economical evaluation and multiple or indirect comparisons.

MODIFICATION OF ABSTRACTS All selected abstracts will be standardised. Treatment name will be replaced with "experimental treatment A", control treatment will be replaced by "control treatment B" if necessary in the title and in the abstract.

The two groups of abstract will be presented as follow:

1. Abstract with " limitations " section

2. Abstract without " limitations " section: the " limitations " section of the original abstract will be deleted.

OUTCOMES PRIMARY OUTCOME The primary outcome will be, the readers' recommendation of the experimental treatment A

SECONDARY OUTCOMES Secondary outcomes will evaluate the interpretation of the results of the meta-analysis. The readers will answers the following questions, with the choice of answers based on a 10-point Likert scale

1. How would you rate the quality of the systematic review?

2. How confident are you in the results of this systematic review?

3. Do you consider that the experimental treatment A is a proven effective treatment?

4. How confident are you in the validity of the conclusion that the authors draw? NUMBER OF PARTICIPANT A power analysis was conducted to estimate the number of subject (participants) needed to achieve a power of 0.9 and an alpha value of 0.05 to discern a different of effect size of 0.4 between the two versions of abstract. This resulted in an estimate to the need of recruit a minimum of 133 participants in each arm, either a total of 266 participants STATISTICAL ANALYSIS We will analyze data with R project software, in intention to treat. Data for quantitative variables are expressed with medians and interquartile (IQR) ranges. Qualitative variables are expressed with frequencies and percentages and missing data Primary analysis will compare means of the primary outcome between the 2 groups with a Student t test.

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Single Blind (Subject)

Conditions

Systematic Review With Metaanalysis

Intervention

interpretation of the abstract

Status

Withdrawn

Source

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Results (where available)

View Results

Links

Published on BioPortfolio: 2014-08-27T04:00:42-0400

Clinical Trials [339 Associated Clinical Trials listed on BioPortfolio]

Using a Systematic Review in Clinical Decision Making: a Pilot Parallel, Randomized Controlled Trial

The purpose of this pilot study is to determine the feasibility of running a full-scale trial that compares two formats of a shortened systematic review to a full-length systematic review ...

A Comparison of Virco®TYPE HIV-1 Testing Versus Expert Interpretation of Genotypic Results for Control of HIV-1 Replication

The investigators seek to determine whether Virco®TYPE HIV-1 provides benefits equivalent to those provided by local expert review. The investigators propose that clinic patients of the R...

Testing New Formats for the Presentation of Research Evidence to Health Care Managers and Policy Makers

Despite advances in the conduct and reporting of traditional systematic reviews, current evidence suggests that they are used infrequently by health care managers and policy makers in deci...

This Study Was a Prospective, One-arm Open Phase II Clinical Trial. A Systematic Review of the pCR of Apatinib in Combination With the Albumin Paclitaxel and Carboplatin Regimens for the Neoadjuvant Therapy of Triple-negative Breast Cancer, as Well as the

This study was a prospective, one-arm open phase II clinical trial. A systematic review of the pCR of apatinib in combination with the albumin paclitaxel and carboplatin regimens for the n...

Psychotropic Drug Use in the Elderly Living in Nursing Homes and the Influence of a Structured Drug Review

The overall aim of this study is to explore if a structured drug review will change clinical symptoms and the psychotropic drugs prescription rate in the elderly living in nursing homes (p...

PubMed Articles [14307 Associated PubMed Articles listed on BioPortfolio]

Single screen of citations with excluded terms: an approach to citation screening in systematic reviews.

Citation screening during the systematic review process can be time-consuming due to the exponentially increasing amount of research. This letter describes an approach to expediting the process by sin...

Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses - Reading, Understanding, Interpreting.

The rising number of medical publications makes it difficult to keep up-to-date on scientific knowledge. In recent years, reviews in the form of narrative or systematic publications and meta-analyses ...

Methodologic Assessment of the Systematic Reviews of Ophthalmic Adverse Drug Reactions Published in Ophthalmology Journals: A Systematic Review.

This systematic review aims to characterize and review the methodology of the systematic reviews reporting ophthalmic adverse drug reactions.

Partially systematic thoughts on the history of systematic reviews.

Six years after the launch of Systematic Reviews by Biomed Central, this article is part of the celebration of the journal. It contains personal reflections on the past, present and future of systemat...

Towards clinical outcome measures in myotonic dystrophy type 2: a systematic review.

Myotonic dystrophies are the most frequent muscular dystrophies in adulthood; however, myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2) is by far less prevalent than myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1). Consequently, stud...

Medical and Biotech [MESH] Definitions

Review of the medical necessity of hospital or other health facility admissions, upon or within a short time following an admission, and periodic review of services provided during the course of treatment.

Multi-step systematic review process used for improving safety by investigation of incidents to find what happened, why it happened, and to determine what can be done to prevent it from happening again.

The study of laws, theories, and hypotheses through a systematic examination of pertinent facts and their interpretation in the field of dentistry. (From Jablonski, Illustrated Dictionary of Dentistry, 1982, p674)

Formal programs for assessing drug prescription against some standard. Drug utilization review may consider clinical appropriateness, cost effectiveness, and, in some cases, outcomes. Review is usually retrospective, but some analysis may be done before drugs are dispensed (as in computer systems which advise physicians when prescriptions are entered). Drug utilization review is mandated for Medicaid programs beginning in 1993.

Organizations representing designated geographic areas which have contracts under the PRO program to review the medical necessity, appropriateness, quality, and cost-effectiveness of care received by Medicare beneficiaries. Peer Review Improvement Act, PL 97-248, 1982.

More From BioPortfolio on "Impact of a Limitation Section on the Meta-analysis Results' Interpretation"

Advertisement
Quick Search
Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Relevant Topic

Nutrition
Within medicine, nutrition (the study of food and the effect of its components on the body) has many different roles. Appropriate nutrition can help prevent certain diseases, or treat others. In critically ill patients, artificial feeding by tubes need t...


Searches Linking to this Trial