Advertisement

Topics

Safe-SCOPE Pilot Study

2017-04-18 05:53:21 | BioPortfolio

Summary

Study Title Safe- SCOPE Pilot Study Standardized Checklist of Patient Information Exchange

Short Title Safe- SCOPE Pilot Study

Study Design: Single centre two armed cluster randomised crossover pilot study

Study duration: 5 months

Objectives:

- Influence of standardised checklists on medical/ physician handovers on an Intensive Care Unit -ICU and its influence on patient safety

- Satisfaction survey in physicians group

Number of patients:

All patients treated on OIM during assessment period

Checklist Intervention

- All physicians working in the department of Intensive Care Medicine and Intermediate Care are informed and enlightened about Safe-SCOPE Pilot Study. After written consent participating physicians will use an online form ISBAR3 Checklist or alternative Checklist for handovers twice a day.

- Handover times/schedule:

OIM 1,2,3,5, und 6: 7:30 am and 7:30 pm OIM 4 und WEA 1: 7:30 am and 2:00 pm

- ISBAR3 Checklist

- VICUR Checklist wash- out Phase:

- No checklists for one month

Efficacy:

Patients:

- Mortality rate

- Duration on ICU

- Reuptake on ICU

- SOFA Score on admission to ICU, 48h, 72h and 120h after admission

- Handover duration per patient

- Number of enclosed patients

Handover:

- Entire handover duration

- Interruptions during handover

Description

The simplest definition of patient safety is the prevention of errors and adverse events to patient associated with health care. While health care has become more effective it has also become more complex, with greater use of new technologies, medicines and treatments. Health services treat older and sicker patients who often present with significant co- morbidities requiring more and more difficult decisions as to health care priorities.

European data, mostly from European Union Member States, consistently show that medical errors and health care related adverse events occur in 8-12% of hospitalization. For example, the United Kingdom Department of health, in its 2000 report "An organisation with a memory", estimated about 850 000 adverse events a year (10% of hospital admissions). Spain (in its 2005 national study of adverse events) and France and Denmark have published incidence studies with similar results.

While 23% of European Union citizens claim to have been directly affected by medial errors, 18% claim to have experienced a serious medical error in a hospital and 11% to be prescribed wrong medication. Evidence on medial errors shows that 50% to 70,2% of such harm can be prevented through comprehensive systematic approaches to patient safety.

Statistics of the World Health Organisation (WHO) show further more that strategies to reduce the rate of adverse events in the European Union alone would lead to the prevention of more than 750 000 harm-inflicted medial errors per year, leading in turn to over 3,2 million fewer days of hospitalization, 260 000 fewer incidents of permanent disability, and 95 000 fewer deaths per years. Our working group clarifies this as very impressive data and statistics.

In aviation checklists are an established instrument to avoid adverse events and so to improve safety. Like in the cockpit also in operating room checklists and briefings can be useful to reduce perceived risks and improve collaboration among operating rooms personnel by controlling safety standards, availability of required sources and responsibility assignment. The World Health Organisation WHO in 2009 established checklist (Save Surgery Saves Lives) is a feasible task increasingly used with individual adaptation. The Implementation has to be ingrained in a hospital wide safety culture with patient safety- related behaviour and perceived personal empowerment. The safe surgery saves lives campaign showed in eight hospitals worldwide with different socio- ecological backgrounds that in around 8. 000 operations mortality and infections rate decreased significantly after using the safe surgery saves lives checklist in operating theatres.

Checklists are efficient working tools used as a reminder or to structure processes. They guarantee that processes are objective and reproducible and therefore increase patient- safety. Especially in stress and emergency situations as they exist on an Intensive Care Unit checklists can help to avoid mind mistakes and demonstrate possible decisions.

Related to these data and statistics and on that important background we are planning a multi-centre main trial on improving patient safety: Standardized Checklist of Patient Information Exchange. Because there is no information about the magnitude of checklist effects on patient data and there is no risk for the patients we use the Safe SCOPE Pilot study to estimate the effects size of the checklists and to investigate the feasibility of the main trial.

Study Design

Conditions

Quality Assurance of Patient Safety

Intervention

Checklist ISBAR3, Checklist VICUR

Location

RWTH Aachen University
Aachen
NRW
Germany
52074

Status

Not yet recruiting

Source

RWTH Aachen University

Results (where available)

View Results

Links

Published on BioPortfolio: 2017-04-18T05:53:21-0400

Clinical Trials [559 Associated Clinical Trials listed on BioPortfolio]

Family-Centered Rounds Checklist Implementation

The goal of this study is to develop, implement, and evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention designed to facilitate family engagement during bedside rounds at a children's hospital. ...

The Use of a Pediatric Trauma Checklist to Improve Clinical Performance in a Simulated Trauma Resuscitation

The use of a pre-arrival and pre-departure trauma checklist to optimize care has not yet been studied. The Alberta Children's Hospital (ACH) Trauma Checklist was developed by the ACH Resus...

Surgical Checklist Success in Latin America

Limited information is available about surgical checklist effectiveness in Latin America. We plan to compare the pre and post surgical checklist implementation in a tertiary healthcare cen...

Introduction of the Surgical Safety Checklist

In January of 2007, the World Health Organization's (WHO) World Alliance for Patient Safety initiated a project called "Safe Surgery Saves Lives" to identify minimum standards of surgical ...

Effects of Checklists in Surgical Care - a Study on Complications, Death and Quality of Patient Administrative Data

This project aims to produce a systematic review on present knowledge on effects of using safety checklists in medicine. Implementation of a checklist system throughout surgical care may r...

PubMed Articles [19316 Associated PubMed Articles listed on BioPortfolio]

Debriefing in the OR: A Quality Improvement Project.

Ineffective communication can contribute to perioperative adverse events even when a safety checklist is used. The purpose of this project was to improve the overall debriefing process of the surgical...

Implementation and evaluation of nationwide scale-up of the Surgical Safety Checklist.

The WHO Surgical Safety Checklist improves surgical outcomes, but evidence and theoretical frameworks for successful implementation in low-income countries remain lacking. Based on previous research i...

Using Performance Management to Implement a Preprocedural Checklist for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Procedures.

Providing safe patient care is an important focus of healthcare organizations. In surgical settings, mortality rates have been shown to decrease from 1.5% to 0.8% and complication rates from 11% to 7%...

Improved Compliance and Comprehension of a Surgical Safety Checklist With Customized Versus Standard Training: A Randomized Trial.

This study aimed to determine the effect of customized training versus standard readily available training on surgical safety checklist (SSCL) compliance and comprehension.

Pooled analysis of WHO Surgical Safety Checklist use and mortality after emergency laparotomy.

The World Health Organization (WHO) Surgical Safety Checklist has fostered safe practice for 10 years, yet its place in emergency surgery has not been assessed on a global scale. The aim of this study...

Medical and Biotech [MESH] Definitions

Aid for consistent recording of data such as tasks completed and observations noted.

Activities and programs intended to assure or improve the quality of care in either a defined medical setting or a program. The concept includes the assessment or evaluation of the quality of care; identification of problems or shortcomings in the delivery of care; designing activities to overcome these deficiencies; and follow-up monitoring to ensure effectiveness of corrective steps.

A sampling methodology using small sample sizes when conducting surveys in small geographical or population-based areas or lots.

A measure of PATIENT SAFETY considering errors or mistakes which result in harm to the patient. They include errors in the administration of drugs and other medications (MEDICATION ERRORS), errors in the performance of procedures or the use of other types of therapy, in the use of equipment, and in the interpretation of laboratory findings and preventable accidents involving patients.

Patient care intended to prevent or relieve suffering in conditions that ensure optimal quality living.

More From BioPortfolio on "Safe-SCOPE Pilot Study"

Advertisement
Quick Search
Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Relevant Topics

Public Health
Alternative Medicine Cleft Palate Complementary & Alternative Medicine Congenital Diseases Dentistry Ear Nose & Throat Food Safety Geriatrics Healthcare Hearing Medical Devices MRSA Muscular Dyst...

Pharmacy
Pharmacy is the science and technique of preparing as well as dispensing drugs and medicines. It is a health profession that links health sciences with chemical sciences and aims to ensure the safe and effective use of pharmaceutical drugs. The scope of...


Searches Linking to this Trial