Advertisement

Topics

Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Resin Composite Versus Indirect Nanohybrid Resin Composite Onlay Restorations.

2017-09-15 00:23:21 | BioPortfolio

Summary

clinical performance of short fiber reinforced resin composite versus indirect nanohybrid resin composite onlay restorations in complex proximal cavities of molar teeth will be evaluated over one year.

Description

Resin composite materials have been rapidly developed in the latest few years. Direct resin composite restorations become the golden standard for restoring intracoronal cavities. While for the extracoronal cavities, the indirect resin composite onlays tend to replace metallic restorations in most situations being more esthetic and conservative with lower cost (Rocca & Krejci, 2007).

Indirect resin composite onlays usually are lab processed in two appointments but it can be made in one appointment through CAD/CAM technology or by flexible model technique (semidirect technique).

These restorations offer more control on the proximal contacts and the anatomic form over the direct approach. Polymerization shrinkage occurs outside the patient mouth so the stresses are decreased and become limited to the width of the luting space. Annual failure rate (AFR) of indirect posterior resin composite restorations is up to 10% (Manhart et al, 2004).

One of the advancement in resin composite technology is the evolution of short fiber reinforced resin composite (SFRC) material that allows making a direct onlay restoration possible thus offers less procedural steps and saves more time (Garoushi et al, 2013).

This material is made to be used as a dentine substitute in the high stress-bearing areas. It is covered by a conventional resin composite filling to act as the enamel replacement this combination gives us a kind of biomimetic restoration.

Study Design

Conditions

Dental Restoration Failure of Marginal Integrity

Intervention

Ever X Posterior

Status

Not yet recruiting

Source

Cairo University

Results (where available)

View Results

Links

Published on BioPortfolio: 2017-09-15T00:23:21-0400

Clinical Trials [1994 Associated Clinical Trials listed on BioPortfolio]

Clinical Investigation of a New Bulk Fill Composite Resin in the Restoration of Posterior Teeth

Polymerization shrinkage remains one of the primary disadvantages of composite resin restorative materials (tooth-colored fillings). To minimize the effects of polymerization shrinkage in ...

Ceramic Tooth Restorations - a Comparison Study

This randomized clinical study aims to compare success and survival of two different ceramic tooth restoration materials. The hypothesis for the study is that fluoride treated zirconia wil...

Clinical Performance of Fiber Reinforced Composite Versus Microhybrid Composite Restorations

Clinical performance of direct fiber reinforced resin composite restorations versus direct microhybrid resin composite restorations in endodontically treated molars will be evaluated over ...

Clinical Performance of Prime&Bond Active in Self-etch or Selective-etch Mode With or Without Bioglass

Composite restoration of non-carious cervical lesions has always been a challenge for the clinician, considering that the most frequent cause of failure is retention loss. Adhesion of com...

Patient Satisfaction ,Marginal Integrity ,Shade Matching and Gingival Health of Zirconia Reinforced Lithium Silicate Bridges Cemented Using Bioactive Cement and Adhesive Resin Cement

Bioactive cement have been introduced recently into the market according to the manufacture it is assumed that it stimulates mineral apatite formation and the natural remineralization proc...

PubMed Articles [8574 Associated PubMed Articles listed on BioPortfolio]

Next generation of dentists moving to amalgam-free dentistry: survey of posterior restorations teaching in North America.

The dental field is gradually reducing the use of amalgam and moving toward adhesive restoration. This change is in accordance with the advancement and improvement of composite resin materials and adh...

Survival, Reasons for Failure and Clinical Characteristics of Anterior/Posterior Composites: 8-Year Findings.

This retrospective study aimed to compare the annual failure rate (AFR), reasons for failure and factors influencing survival of posterior and anterior composite restorations placed by undergraduate s...

Clinical Performance of Short Dental Implants Supporting Single Crown Restoration in the Molar-Premolar Region: Cement Versus Screw Retention.

This study assessed the survival and marginal bone loss of single-unit short implants (≤ 8 mm in length) in the premolar-molar area. It also compared cemented with screw-retained restoration.

Implants in the Posterior Maxilla: Open Sinus Lift Versus Conventional Implant Placement. A Systematic Review.

To compare implant survival, marginal bone loss, peri-implant clinical parameters, and complications in dental implants placed in the posterior maxilla in native bone or after grafting using the open ...

The teaching of posterior composites: A survey of dental schools in Oceania.

To investigate current teaching and operative techniques of posterior composite restorations in dental schools in Oceania (Australia, New Zealand, Fiji and Papua New Guinea).

Medical and Biotech [MESH] Definitions

Inability or inadequacy of a dental restoration or prosthesis to perform as expected.

The degree of approximation or fit of filling material or dental prosthetic to the tooth surface. A close marginal adaptation and seal at the interface is important for successful dental restorations.

A prosthesis or restoration placed for a limited period, from several days to several months, which is designed to seal the tooth and maintain its position until a permanent restoration (DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT) will replace it. (From Jablonski, Dictionary of Dentistry, 1992)

The process of repairing broken or worn parts of a PERMANENT DENTAL RESTORATION.

An operation in which carious material is removed from teeth and biomechanically correct forms are established in the teeth to receive and retain restorations. A constant requirement is provision for prevention of failure of the restoration through recurrence of decay or inadequate resistance to applied stresses. (Boucher's Clinical Dental Terminology, 4th ed, p239-40)

More From BioPortfolio on "Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Resin Composite Versus Indirect Nanohybrid Resin Composite Onlay Restorations."

Advertisement
Quick Search
Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Relevant Topic

Dentistry
Dentistry is the study, management and treatment of diseases and conditions affecting the mouth, jaw, teeth and their supporting tissues (Oxford Medical Dictionary) The work of a dentist ranges from regular patient check-up to orthodontics and surgery....


Searches Linking to this Trial