Topics

Blade vs Screw Intertrochanteric Hip Fracture Fixation Study

2018-04-13 07:44:13 | BioPortfolio

Summary

This study evaluates the rate of cut-out and fixation failures in helical blade fixation versus lag screw fixation for cephalomedullary nailing of peritrochanteric femur fractures.

Description

As the population ages, the prevalence of peritrochanteric femur fractures continues to increase each year. An increase in the use of intramedullary devices as treatment has accompanied this increase in peritrochanteric femur fractures. Intramedullary devices are now used more frequently than plate and screw constructs nationwide to treat peritrochanteric femur fractures1. While the prognosis following intramedullary device placement remains favorable compared to other treatment options, there are still complications that exist. Cut-out of the cephalomedullary implant through the femoral head has long been one of the more prevalent complications when using an intramedullary device.2 To address the shortcomings that cause lag screw cut-out, the helical blade was designed. In theory, it provides improved fixation over the lag screw by compacting cancellous bone as it is inserted and may also be more effective at supporting torsional loading.3 Additionally, the helical blade has been shown to require less operation time and less fluoroscopy time during implantation.4

Currently, there is a lack of a randomized prospective study comparing the rates of cut-out in lag screw fixation and helical blade fixation of peritrochanteric femur fractures using third generation cephalomedullary femoral nails. A recent retrospective study by Stern et al analyzed the rate of cut-out of helical blades and lag screws in peritrochanteric femur fractures treated with cephalomedullary nails and found that the helical blade was much more prone to cut-out than the lag screw. Cut-out rates were 15.1% and 3.0% for the implants respectively.5 While this study seems to suggest that, in terms of cutout, the helical blade is inferior to the lag screw, there are many factors that limit its validity and applicability. First, the study was a retrospective study which inherently induces some level of bias. Next, the study recorded a cut-out rate for the helical blade that is much higher than and not consistent with studies that have been previously reported. Flores et al reported a cut-out rate of 3.4% in 258 patients treated with the helical blade, Gardner et al reported a cut-out rate of 5.15% in 97 patients treated with the helical blade, and Liu et al reported a cut-out rate of 6.7% in 223 patients treated with the helical blade.6,7,8 These numbers are all drastically lower than the rates of cut-out reported by Stern et al. Another limitation to their study was that 26 surgeons operated on the 362 patients that were included in the study. This large number of surgeons introduced a significant amount of variability that could not be controlled for. While this study provides some evidence that the helical blade may be inferior to the lag screw in terms of cut-out, it is not definitive and a prospective study is needed to truly validate this claim. Additionally, factors such as tip-apex distance, time to cut-out, direction of cut-out reduction quality, and fracture pattern must be analyzed to accurately assess the usefulness of the helical blade compared to the lag screw and determine predictors for cut-out.

While the primary purpose of this study will be to analyze rates of cut-out between the two fixation devices, we are also interested in determining a threshold tip-apex distance that is predictive of cut-out. While Stern et al reported data that supported the hypothesis that increased tip-apex distance is predictive of cut-out, they did not identify a threshold that, itself, is predictive of cut-out.5 It was previously thought that a tip-apex distance greater than 25mm is predictive of cut-out.4 Other studies, however, have shown that tip-apex distances that are too small are also predictive of cutout.8 It will be our goal to measure tip-apex distance in all patients and attempt to determine if there is a threshold that is predictive of cut-out.

Another factor of importance that we will investigate is the direction of cut-out of the two implants. Previous comparisons have found that while the lag screw tends to cutout superiorly, the helical blade is much more likely to cutout medially.5,8 This is thought to be due to the compaction of bone that occurs when the helical blade is inserted and also why there appears to be greater rates of cut-out with smaller tip-apex distances.8 By gaining a further understanding of the direction that these implants typically fail we hope to have another predictor of cut-out.

Finally, it will be our goal to attempt to assess reduction quality and fracture pattern to determine each factor's predictive value of cut-out. It has already been suggested that non-anatomical reduction and complex fracture patterns increase the likelihood of cut-out.9

Study Design

Conditions

Pertrochanteric Fracture of Femur, Closed

Intervention

Lag screw fixation, Helical blade fixation

Status

Not yet recruiting

Source

Milton S. Hershey Medical Center

Results (where available)

View Results

Links

Published on BioPortfolio: 2018-04-13T07:44:13-0400

Clinical Trials [1148 Associated Clinical Trials listed on BioPortfolio]

Pertrochanteric Fracture Fixation In Elderly Adults Using Proximal Femoral Nail Anti-rotation (HERACLES) With a T-shaped Parallel Blade: A New Design

This is a prospective case series of elderly adult patients sustaining pertrochanteric fractures who will be treated by a proximal femoral nail with a non-helical (straight) blade. This st...

Comparing Surgical Techniques for CRIF of Pertrochanteric Fractures

Hypothesis: Inflatable intra medullary femoral nailing is superior to DHS in terms of blood loss, operative complications and postoperative rehabilitation in the management of pertrochante...

Computer Guided Lag Screw Fixation Versus Conventional Lag Screw Fixation in Anterior Mandibular Fractures

Comparison between computer guided lag screw fixation versus traditional lag screw fixation in open reduction and internal fixation of anterior mandibular fractures.

Stabilization of Fresh Unilateral Unstable Pertrochanteric Hip Fracture

This is a preliminary study to establish the issues and potential of the investigators proposed project, which involves recruitment of patients with and without dementia, who have been adm...

Radiography Protocol in the Acute Phase After Proximal Femur Internal Fixation- Self Assessment and Recommendations

There is no standardized protocol regarding the post-operative radiographic follow up of patients that sustain pertrochanteric hip fractures and are treated with closed reduction and inter...

PubMed Articles [2321 Associated PubMed Articles listed on BioPortfolio]

An unusual case of femoral head perforation following fixation with proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA-II) for an unstable intertrochanteric fracture: Case report and literature review.

The proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA-II) is designed for fixation of unstable proximal femoral fractures in Asian patients due to its superior biomechanical properties. The helical blade achie...

Reoperations in intramedullary fixation of pertrochanteric hip fractures.

This study evaluated the frequency of reoperation within one year of initial intramedullary fixation for patients with pertrochanteric hip fracture and compared one-year healthcare resource utilizatio...

Biomechanical effects of posterior pedicle fixation techniques on the adjacent segment for the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures: a biomechanical analysis.

Posterior pedicle fixation technique is a common method for treating thoracolumbar burst fractures, but the effect of different fixation techniques on the postoperative spinal mechanical properties ha...

Conventional plate fixation versus minimally invasive modified pedicle screw-rod fixation for anterior pelvic ring fractures.

There are various methods of fixation for anterior pelvic ring fractures. We report our experience with modified pedicle screw-rod fixation (MPSRF) via a minimally invasive method. Fourteen patients w...

First results of multicortical screw anchoring compared with conventional bicortical screw placement in the sacrum: A biomechanical investigation of a new screw design.

Bicortical screw fixation is an established technique to increase screw strength in vertebral bodies, although it is associated with several complications, for example screw-loosening. Cement augmenta...

Medical and Biotech [MESH] Definitions

The use of metallic devices inserted into or through bone to hold a fracture in a set position and alignment while it heals.

Implantable fracture fixation devices attached to bone fragments with screws to bridge the fracture gap and shield the fracture site from stress as bone heals. (UMDNS, 1999)

The use of internal devices (metal plates, nails, rods, etc.) to hold the position of a fracture in proper alignment.

The use of nails that are inserted into bone cavities in order to keep fractured bones together.

Use of a device for the purpose of controlling movement of all or part of the body. Splinting and casting are FRACTURE FIXATION.

More From BioPortfolio on "Blade vs Screw Intertrochanteric Hip Fracture Fixation Study"

Quick Search

Relevant Topics

Osteoporosis
Osteoporosis is a disease in which the bones become extremely porous, are subject to fracture, and heal slowly, occurring especially in women following menopause and often leading to curvature of the spine from vertebral collapse. Follow and track&n...

Diagnostics
A diagnostic test is any kind of medical test performed to aid in the diagnosis or detection of disease. For example: to diagnose diseases to measure the progress or recovery from disease to confirm that a person is free from disease Clin...


Searches Linking to this Trial