Standard Implants With Bone Regeneration vs Short Implants

2018-05-20 18:37:09 | BioPortfolio

Published on BioPortfolio: 2018-05-20T18:37:09-0400

Clinical Trials [2842 Associated Clinical Trials listed on BioPortfolio]

Comparison Between Ultra-narrow Diameter Implants (2,75 mm) Without Bone Regeneration Versus Standard Diameter Implants (4,3 mm) in Combination With Bone Regeneration

The main target of the study is to compare ultra-narrow diameter implants (2.75 mm) without bone regeneration versus standard diameter implants (4.3 mm) in combination with bone regenerati...

Immediate Function of NobelSpeedy Shorty and Brånemark System® Mk III Shorty Implants in Daily Use

Surgical and restorative procedures in the posterior region of both the mandible and the maxilla present a complex task. The posterior regions usually exhibit less favorable bone quality a...

The Influence of the Crown-implant Ratio on the Crestal Bone Level and Implant Secondary Stability

The aim of the study was to determine whether implant length and the crown-to-implant (C/I) ratio influence implant stability and the loss of the surrounding marginal bone, and whether sho...

A Study of Certain Prevail Implants Used for the Preservation of Crestal Bone in Short Fixed Bridge Cases.

This prospective, randomized study will evaluate the performance of the Osseotite Certain Prevail implant when compared to that of the non-lateralized version of the implant. Study (null)...

Dental Implants With a SLActive® vs. SLA® Surface

This post-market study is to show that dental implants with a SLActive® surface (SLActive® implants) show non-inferior clinical performance compared to dental implants with a SLA® surfa...

PubMed Articles [12545 Associated PubMed Articles listed on BioPortfolio]

Five-year results from a randomised controlled trial comparing prostheses supported by 5-mm long implants or by longer implants in augmented bone in posterior atrophic edentulous jaws.

To evaluate whether 5-mm short dental implants could be an alternative to augmentation with anorganic bovine bone and placement of at least 10-mm long implants in posterior atrophic jaws.

Clinical and patient-reported outcomes of implants placed in autogenous bone grafts and implants placed in native bone: a case-control study with a follow up of 5 to 16 years.

to compare the radiographic marginal bone levels of implants placed in sites previously augmented with autogenous bone grafts and implants placed in native bone. Secondary outcomes included: implant s...

Implants in the Posterior Maxilla: Open Sinus Lift Versus Conventional Implant Placement. A Systematic Review.

To compare implant survival, marginal bone loss, peri-implant clinical parameters, and complications in dental implants placed in the posterior maxilla in native bone or after grafting using the open ...

Is implant placement performed at the same surgical time as orbital exenteration a viable procedure?

To assess the efficacy and safety of bone-anchored dental implant placement at the same time as orbital exenteration compared with delayed implant placement.

15-year follow-up of short dental implants placed in the partially edentulous patient: Mandible Vs maxilla.

There is paucity of the studies that assess the outcomes of short dental implants with a follow-up time higher than 10 years. This study aims to evaluate the long-term (15 years) survival and marginal...

Medical and Biotech [MESH] Definitions

Region of interaction between the bone and PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS which becomes bonded through cellular and extracellular interactions similar to OSSEOINTEGRATION.

Biocompatible materials usually used in dental and bone implants that enhance biologic fixation, thereby increasing the bond strength between the coated material and bone, and minimize possible biological effects that may result from the implant itself.


Endosseous dental implantation where implants are fitted with an abutment or where an implant with a transmucosal coronal portion is used immediately (within 1 week) after the initial extraction. Conventionally, the implantation is performed in two stages with more than two months in between the stages.

Insertion of an implant into the bone of the mandible or maxilla. The implant has an exposed head which protrudes through the mucosa and is a prosthodontic abutment.

More From BioPortfolio on "Standard Implants With Bone Regeneration vs Short Implants"

Quick Search


Searches Linking to this Trial