Topics

Nickel Sensitivity

2019-08-21 20:05:47 | BioPortfolio

Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare clinical outcomes of patients with self reported nickel sensitivity undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with conventional, standard-of-care vs nickel-free implants. The hypothesis is that patients with a self-reported nickel sensitivity will have similar patient reported outcome scores compared to those patients without reported nickel sensitivity. Therefor the anticipation is for there to be no differences in other clinical outcome measures or functional outcome scores between the two cohorts.

Description

Metal implants are a mainstay of orthopedic treatment, and a variety of metal implants have been utilized for more than 40 years. Total knee replacement implants have been comprised of a variety of metal, ceramic, and plastic components. Current standard-of-care for TKA employs a cobalt chrome alloy femoral implant that articulates with the polyethylene surface of the tibial component. This cobalt chrome alloy can contain up to 1% nickel.1

While most patients report pain relief and satisfaction after TKA, there are a number of complications that can result. Infection, component loosening, polyethylene wear, and malalignment are common reasons for persistent pain after TKA. Metal sensitivity as a cause of persistent pain after total joint arthroplasty is a controversial topic. Cutaneous metal hypersensitivity has a prevalence of approximately 10-15% in the general population, with nickel being the most common metal sensitizer with a prevalence near 14%.2,3 Cross reactivity with cobalt chrome and nickel is very common.

The role of metal allergy in orthopedic surgery and total joint arthroplasty is a poorly understood relationship. The cause and effect relationship of this process has not been delineated - it is unclear if the immunogenic response causes implant failure, or implant failure releases hapten particles with lead to a deep tissue reaction.5

Metal hypersensitivity after TKA is a rarely documented phenomenon without specific diagnostic criteria, and there is much debate on if this is even a true diagnosis.6,7 The two most commonly described presentations include 1) dermatitis or 2) persistent painful synovitis6,8 although these have only been described in case reports without defined diagnostic criteria. Few reports exist regarding the diagnosis and management of these conditions. There is no reliable or generally accepted test to predict allergy to total joint replacement components. Patient history of metal sensitivity is not a reliable indicator of TJA outcome, as 25% of patients with well-functioning TJA implants have a reported metal allergy.2 A nickel or metal sensitivity has not been statistically identified as a risk factor for any specific cutaneous or deep tissue reaction, complication, or poor outcome after TKA.

Typically, metal sensitivity patients are identified after having a superficial skin reaction after dermal contact with a metal. Nickel containing jewelry is a common precipitator. The true diagnosis of skin sensitivity to metal is diagnosed by cutaneous patch testing, often employed by dermatologists. This test is not specific or sensitive for the diagnosis of deep tissue metal sensitivity. In a case control study, Granchi et al followed 94 patients without metal implants, with stable painless TKA, and with TKA and evidence of loosening. The study found no predictive value in dermal patch testing for metal hypersensitivity and the stability of TKA implants.9 Verma et al followed 30 patients with dermatitis following TKA.6 Fifteen were available for patch testing, but only seven patients tested 1+ or 2+ reaction to a metal. Dermatitis in all patients cleared with topical steroid. The relationship between positive patch testing and clinically relevant deep tissue reactions has not been delineated.4

Lymphocyte transformation testing (LTT) or lymphocyte stimulation testing involves obtaining patient lymphocytes from a peripheral blood draw, and testing reactivity with a variety of antigens, including cobalt, nickel, and zirconium. Many argue that this test better replicates the sensitization that occurs in deep tissue after TJA, but its correlation to outcomes after arthroplasty has never been shown.2,4,10 Niki et al preformed lymphocyte stimulating testing on 92 patients (108 knees) undergoing primary TKA. 24 patients tested positive for metal hypersensitivity. Ultimately only five went on to develop dermatitis.11 Thus the clinical significance of positive results of lymphocyte stimulation testing is still unknown.

Additionally, serum metal levels are often elevated in patients with well-functioning TKA, and thus this test is not recommended for diagnosis of metal sensitivity.4 As a result, other causes such as infection, malalignment, aseptic loosening, referred pain, or systemic pain syndromes should all evaluated in persistently painful TKA.

At this time, metal sensitivity is not considered a significant cause of TKA failure. As the literature is inconclusive on identification and management of patients with metal hypersensitivity there is currently no indication for metal allergy screening prior to TKA. No study has found that patients with a previously known metal sensitivity have an increase rate of failure or revision TKA compared to those without. None of the major academic orthopedic societies recommend routine use of nickel free implants. There is currently no data showing correlation between nickel allergy and poor outcomes after total joint replacement with nickel containing implants. While non-nickel containing TKA implants have been developed, there is no evidence-based criteria for their use in specific patient populations.1,12 The goal of this study is to compare Knee Society Scores in patients with self-reported metal allergy who receive standard of care nickel containing implants vs oxidized zirconium nickel free implants for primary TKA.

Study Design

Conditions

Knee Arthropathy

Intervention

TKA with nickel free components, TKA with standard cobalt chromium components

Location

Rush University medical Center
Chicago
Illinois
United States
60612

Status

Not yet recruiting

Source

Rush University Medical Center

Results (where available)

View Results

Links

Published on BioPortfolio: 2019-08-21T20:05:47-0400

Clinical Trials [488 Associated Clinical Trials listed on BioPortfolio]

A Comparison Between Titanium Femoral Stem and Cobalt-Chromium Femoral Stem in Cemented Hip Arthroplasty

In this randomised study, the migration of a specific cemented titanium femoral stem will be compared with a similar cemented cobalt-chromium stem using Roentgen stereogrammetric analysis ...

Effect of a Nickel Free Diet and Nickel Sensitization on GERD Patients.

There is little evidence on the effect of a nickel-free diet on gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). We hope to determine if a nickel-free diet improves GERD symptoms in patients with a...

Study to Evaluate the Safety of Cronus® - Cobalt Chromium Coronary Stent

The objective this study is evaluate the performance and safety of Chronus® cobalt-chromium coronary stent in patients with "de novo" native coronary artery lesions treated with 19-mm-lon...

Comparison Between Injection Molded PEEK Framework and Cobalt Chromium Framework in Removable Partial Denture Regarding Retention

This study is aiming to evaluate the retentive forces in PEEK framework RPD compared to Cobalt-Chrome framework RPD during attachment/detachment cycles in mandibular kennedy class I edentu...

Comparison Between Injection Molded PEEK Framework and Cobalt Chromium Framework Removable Partial Dentures Regarding Biting Force

This study is aiming to evaluate the biting force of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) framework partial dentures compared to that of cobalt-chromium ones in mandibular Kennedy class I edentulou...

PubMed Articles [9908 Associated PubMed Articles listed on BioPortfolio]

A nickel foam modified with electrodeposited cobalt and phosphor for amperometric determination of dopamine.

Considering the importance of dopamine (DA) detection for neuroscience and disease diagnosis, herein, an electrochemical sensor for dopamine is described. It is based on the use of a Ni-Co-P nanostruc...

Bioaccessibility and relative oral bioavailability of cobalt and nickel in residential soil and dust affected by metal grinding operations.

Including measures of relative bioavailability (RBA) improves the accuracy of site-specific risk assessment when evaluating metals bound in matrices that resist acid digestion (alloys, slag, tailings)...

A spectrophotometric method for simultaneous determination of trace ions of copper, cobalt, and nickel in the zinc sulfate solution by ultraviolet-visible spectrometry.

In the zinc sulfate solution, the concentration ratio of zinc to metal ion impurities can be up to 10, which causes impurity ion signals to be severely masked by the zinc signal. In particular, nickel...

Cobalt, nickel and iron embedded chitosan microparticles as efficient and reusable catalysts for Heck cross-coupling reactions.

Cobalt, nickel and iron are efficient catalysts for numerous chemical and biological reactions, but they are hardly immobilized on solid matrixes due to their relatively weak chelation with the surfac...

Bioaccessibility of nickel and cobalt in powders and massive forms of stainless steel, nickel- or cobalt-based alloys, and nickel and cobalt metals in artificial sweat.

Nickel (Ni) and cobalt (Co) are the most common metal allergens upon skin contact at occupational settings and during consumer handling of metals and alloys. A standardized test (EN, 1811) exists to a...

Medical and Biotech [MESH] Definitions

Specific alloys not less than 85% chromium and nickel or cobalt, with traces of either nickel or cobalt, molybdenum, and other substances. They are used in partial dentures, orthopedic implants, etc.

The fusion of ceramics (porcelain) to an alloy of two or more metals for use in restorative and prosthodontic dentistry. Examples of metal alloys employed include cobalt-chromium, gold-palladium, gold-platinum-palladium, and nickel-based alloys.

An alloy of 60% cobalt, 20% chromium, 5% molybdenum, and traces of other substances. It is used in dentures, certain surgical appliances, prostheses, implants, and instruments.

Stable cobalt atoms that have the same atomic number as the element cobalt, but differ in atomic weight. Co-59 is a stable cobalt isotope.

Stable chromium atoms that have the same atomic number as the element chromium, but differ in atomic weight. Cr-50, 53, and 54 are stable chromium isotopes.

More From BioPortfolio on "Nickel Sensitivity"

Quick Search

Relevant Topics

Joint Disorders
A joint is where two or more bones come together, like the knee, hip, elbow, or shoulder. Joints can be damaged by many types of injuries or diseases, including Arthritis - inflammation of a joint causes pain, stiffness, and swelling with ...

Orthopedics
Arthroplasty Joint Disorders Orthopedics Spinal Cord Disorders Orthopedics is the science or practice of correcting deformities caused by disease or damage to the bones and joints of the skeleton. This specialized branch of surgery may ...


Searches Linking to this Trial