Topics

MIS-D Versus MIS-TLIF for the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

2020-03-27 03:25:32 | BioPortfolio

Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of two minimal invasive spine surgery, minimally invasive spinal decompression (MIS-D) and minimally invasive spinal decompression and fusion (MIS-TLIF), for patients diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis in terms of clinical outcomes, complications, reoperations, and other perioperative data.

Description

Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is one of the most common degenerative spine diseases in older people and is associated with mechanical low back pain, radiculopathy and/or neurological claudication. The results of The Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) reported that, surgical treatment in these patients led to significantly greater improvement in pain and function than nonsurgical treatment. Nowadays, decompression with instrumented or non-instrumented fusion is commonly practiced which is regarded as the "gold standard" surgery for LSS.

Over the last two decades, several retrospective studies comparing the surgical outcomes of decompression alone and decompression plus fusion for LSS have been published. Most of the studies concluded that decompression plus fusion had better clinical outcomes compared with decompression alone. However, in 2016, two randomized control trials (RCT) about LSS were published in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) and raised some serious questions. The results of both studies showed that fusion did not have much additional value for patients with stable LSS, and moreover, it might be regard as an overcautious and unnecessary treatment, which were contradictory to most of the previous studies.

Over the past few years, minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) has been improving rapidly due to the development of related instruments, more experienced surgeons, and patients' demands. Compared with open spine surgery, MISS has already proved to be associated with less surgical trauma and rapid recovery with similar clinical outcomes. Minimally invasive spinal decompression (MIS-D) and minimally invasive spinal decompression and fusion (MIS-TLIF) have been performed widely for the treatment of LSS. However, there is no previous study comparing MIS-D to MIS-TLIF in terms of clinical outcomes, complications, reoperations, and other perioperative data. Therefore, a randomized controlled trial comparing these 2 common MISS techniques is warranted.

Study Design

Conditions

Spinal Stenosis

Intervention

minimally invasive spinal decompression (MIS-D), minimally invasive spinal decompression and fusion (MIS-TLIF)

Status

Not yet recruiting

Source

Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University

Results (where available)

View Results

Links

Published on BioPortfolio: 2020-03-27T03:25:32-0400

Clinical Trials [5874 Associated Clinical Trials listed on BioPortfolio]

Effects of Health Education for Patients Received Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spinal Surgery

Lumbar degenerative disease surgery has been a routine clinical operation, and has good treatment effects. Although the patient's neurological symptoms improve after surgery, many patients...

Minimally Invasive Lumbar Aneasthesia Used for Cesarean Section

Spinal canal anesthesia is marked the most commonly used method of cesarean section. Traditional spinal anesthesia may cause post-dural puncture headache and low back pain.Plenty of partur...

Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

A study that compares between Open TLIF and Minimally invasive TLIF regarding patients' functional status(Oswestry Disability index)as a primary outcome measure.

Study of the Quality of Post Release on Scanners Operating in Minimally Invasive Arthrodesis

For twenty years, as for other surgical disciplines, new minimally invasive techniques have been developed with the main goal the reduction of muscle trauma associated with the surrounding...

Study of MILD® Devices in Patients With Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

This is a multi-center, prospective, clinical study to assess the clinical application and outcomes of Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression with the MILD® devices in patients with symp...

PubMed Articles [4966 Associated PubMed Articles listed on BioPortfolio]

Minimally invasive spinal surgery: stages of development.

In recent decades, spinal surgery has changed significantly. The active use of modern knowledge of anatomy, various diagnostic modules, specialized surgical equipment and high-tech tools has made it p...

Minimally Invasive Multilevel Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Posterior Column Osteotomy Compared with Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy for Adult Spinal Deformity.

Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) is highly effective as a sagittal correction approach in patients with adult spinal deformity, but relevant issues such as surgical complexity and long-term complic...

Head-up Display Assisted Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy - A Technical Note.

Minimally invasive surgery is heavily dependent on indirect visualization and image guidance, often resulting in non-ergonomic postures. Minimally invasive surgeons are more likely to experience neck ...

Evolution of minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer: update from the national cancer database.

As the use of minimally invasive techniques in colorectal surgery has become increasingly prevalent, concerns remain about the oncologic effectiveness and long-term outcomes of minimally invasive low ...

Minimally invasive gastrectomy for cancer and anastomotic options.

In this review article, we explore patient selection criteria for minimally invasive surgery (MIS) gastrectomy, present evidence on the risks and benefits of minimally invasive techniques, describe op...

Medical and Biotech [MESH] Definitions

Procedures that avoid use of open invasive surgery in favor of closed or local surgery. These generally involve use of laparoscopic devices and remote-control manipulation of instruments with indirect observation of the surgical field through an endoscope or similar device. With the reduced trauma associated with minimally invasive surgery, long hospital stays may be reduced with increased rates of short stay or day surgery.

Procedures that avoid use of open, invasive surgery in favor of closed or local surgery. These generally involve use of laparoscopic devices and remote-controlled manipulation of instruments with indirect observation of the surgical field through an endoscope or similar device.

The use of ultrasound to guide minimally invasive surgical procedures such as needle ASPIRATION BIOPSY; DRAINAGE; etc. Its widest application is intravascular ultrasound imaging but it is useful also in urology and intra-abdominal conditions.

Minimally invasive procedures guided with the aid of magnetic resonance imaging to visualize tissue structures.

Minimally invasive procedures, diagnostic or therapeutic, performed within the BLOOD VESSELS. They may be perfomed via ANGIOSCOPY; INTERVENTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; INTERVENTIONAL RADIOGRAPHY; or INTERVENTIONAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY.

More From BioPortfolio on "MIS-D Versus MIS-TLIF for the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis"

Quick Search

Relevant Topics

Surgical treatments
Surgery is a technology consisting of a physical intervention on tissues. All forms of surgery are considered invasive procedures; so-called "noninvasive surgery" usually refers to an excision that does not penetrate the structure being exci...

Spinal Cord Disorders
The spinal cord is a bundle of nerves that runs down the middle of the back which carry signals back and forth between the body and brain. It is protected by vertebrae, which are the bone disks that make up the spine. An accident that damages the verte...

Anesthesiology
An anesthesiologist (US English) or anaesthetist (British English) is a physician trained in anesthesia and perioperative medicine. Anesthesiologists are physicians who provide medical care to patients in a wide variety of (usually acute) situations. ...


Searches Linking to this Trial