HIV Vaccine Study in HIV Positive Patients

2014-08-27 03:15:49 | BioPortfolio


The purpose of the study is to see whether a single vaccination (injection) with the investigational HIV vaccine is safe and effective in patients who are HIV positive but have not yet begun anti-retroviral therapy. As this is an exploratory study, four different dose formulations of HIV vaccine will be investigated.

This study will evaluate whether or not the HIV vaccine is able to reduce the HIV viral load (number of HIV virus particles in the blood) and increase or slow the decline in CD4 T cell count.


The study will consist of a screening period of 3 to 21 days before vaccination on Day 0 and a double-blind treatment period of 28 days with a follow up period of 5 months. Prior to conducting any study-related procedures, subjects will provide written informed consent. During screening, eligibility will be assessed, a medical history will be taken, a complete physical examination will be performed and vital signs will be measured. Blood samples will be taken for the assessment of HCV and HBV status. Further samples will be taken for CD4 and HIV load, haematology, biochemistry, urinalysis and a 12-lead electrocardiographic (ECG) assessment will be carried out. A self-assessment diary card will be used by subjects between Day 0 and Day 28 to record any AEs.

On Days 7, 14, 21 and 28 an AE interview will be conducted, concomitant medications and vital signs will be recorded and a physical examination will be performed. Samples will be collected for haematology, clinical chemistry and urinalysis. In addition, samples will be collected for CD4 T cell count and HIV viral load at days 14 and 28 after vaccination. A sample will be collected for immunogenicity on Day 28.

All patients will attend follow-up visits at Weeks 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 at which a physical examination and examination of the injection site will be performed and vital signs measured. Samples will be collected for haematology, biochemistry, urinalysis CD4 T-cell count and HIV viral load. Blood samples for immunogenicity testing will be collected at Weeks 12 and 24.

Stage I: Sequential, non-randomised, single blind, parallel group. Five male HIV-1 positive volunteers will be vaccinated in a sequential, non-randomised single blind fashion. They will each receive one of the five possible active study treatments (WFI only, adjuvant only, low dose + WFI, low dose + adjuvant, high dose + WFI and high dose + adjuvant). Each of these five patients will be observed as in-patients for 24 hours after vaccination and vaccinations will be performed in a sequential manner with at least 48 hours observation of each patient before vaccination of the next patient is commenced.

Following completion of the '28 day treatment follow up' by the five Stage I subjects a Safety Committee will review the safety and tolerability data for these subjects and will make a recommendation for continuing or discontinuing recruitment and any changes that may be required in the conduct of the study. Subject to a positive decision from the Safety Committee the remaining subjects will be recruited into Stage II of the study.

Stage II: randomised, double-blind group 50 male HIV-1 positive volunteers will be randomised to one of five possible treatment groups. Following completion of the Day 1 Visit by the first five subjects in Stage II the Safety Committee will review the blinded safety and tolerability data for these subjects. Subject to acceptable safety and tolerability, the centres will be allowed to continue recruitment for the rest of the planned cohort.

After 25 Stage II subjects have completed the Day 1 Visit a Safety Committee will review the blinded data generated and will make a recommendation for continuing or discontinuing recruitment and any changes that may be required in the conduct of the study.

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Control: Placebo Control, Endpoint Classification: Safety Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Supportive Care


HIV Infections


HIV-v (Low Dose), HIV-v (High Dose), HIV-v (Control)


Elton John Centre, Sussex House,
United Kingdom




PepTcell Limited

Results (where available)

View Results


Published on BioPortfolio: 2014-08-27T03:15:49-0400

Clinical Trials [6835 Associated Clinical Trials listed on BioPortfolio]

RSV F Dose-Ranging Study in Women

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of multiple formulations of an RSV-F protein nanoparticle vaccine, with aluminum, in healthy women of child-bearing a...

HIgh Dose Thymoglobulin Instead of Cyclosporine With a Low Dose of Thymoglobulin for GVHD Prophylaxis

The purpose of this study is to find out whether compared to our standard low dose ATG with CSA, the high dose ATG without CSA minimizes the chances of relapse and chronic GVHD, without in...

Phase II High Dose Brachytherapy and Low Dose Rate Brachytherapy as Monotherapy in Localized Prostate Cancer

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the dose of High Dose Rate (HDR) brachytherapy chosen for this study as well as a commonly used alternate form of brachytherapy called low dose rat...

Low Dose Versus High Dose Dexamethasone for Symptom Control in Children Undergoing Cranial or Craniospinal Radiation

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of low dose dexamethasone versus high dose dexamethasone in the treatment of radiation induced vomiting.

High Dose IL 2 and Entinostat in RCC

This is a multicenter, randomized, open label study of high dose interleukin 2 vs high dose interleukin 2 plus entinostat in treatment-naïve clear cell RCC patients who are candidate for ...

PubMed Articles [27418 Associated PubMed Articles listed on BioPortfolio]

Natural Killer Cell Recruitment to the Lung During Influenza A Virus Infection Is Dependent on CXCR3, CCR5, and Virus Exposure Dose.

Natural killer (NK) cells are vital components of the antiviral immune response, but their contributions in defense against influenza A virus (IAV) are not well understood. To better understand NK cel...

Which is better, high-dose metformin monotherapy or low-dose metformin/ linagliptin combination therapy, in improving glycemic variability in type 2 diabetes patients with insufficient glycemic control despite low-dose metformin monotherapy: A randomized, crossover, CGM-based, pilot study.

This study investigates the effect of high-dose metformin or low-dose metformin/linagliptin combination therapy on glycemic variability (GV) in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients with insufficient glycemi...

Efficacy of High-Dose Methotrexate in Pediatric Non-Infectious Uveitis.

To analyze the efficacy of high dose (≥ 15mg/m2/week) methotrexate (MTX) versus low dose (

Open-Label, Crossover Study to Determine the Pharmacokinetics of Fluticasone Furoate and Batefenterol When Administered Alone, in Combination, or Concurrently.

The study aim was to investigate the pharmacokinetics of single high doses and repeated therapeutic doses of fluticasone furoate (FF) and batefenterol (BAT; a bifunctional muscarinic antagonist and β...

Radiation dose level inside the control room of open pool type reactor during emergency situation.

The objective of this paper is to estimate radiation dose level in the control room due to air contamination in the containment of open pool type reactor during emergency situation. A postulated core ...

Medical and Biotech [MESH] Definitions

The dose amount of poisonous or toxic substance or dose of ionizing radiation required to kill 50% of the tested population.

A treatment schedule in which the total dose of radiation is divided into large doses.

Mice selectively bred for hypersusceptibility to two-stage chemical skin carcinogenesis. They are also hypersusceptible to UV radiation tumorigenesis with single high-dose, but not chronic low-dose, exposures. SENCAR (SENsitive to CARcinogenesis) mice are used in research as an animal model for tumor production.

The highest dose of a biologically active agent given during a chronic study that will not reduce longevity from effects other than carcinogenicity. (from Lewis Dictionary of Toxicology, 1st ed)

The specific failure of a normally responsive individual to make an immune response to a known antigen. It results from previous contact with the antigen by an immunologically immature individual (fetus or neonate) or by an adult exposed to extreme high-dose or low-dose antigen, or by exposure to radiation, antimetabolites, antilymphocytic serum, etc.

More From BioPortfolio on "HIV Vaccine Study in HIV Positive Patients"

Quick Search


Relevant Topics

Public Health
Alternative Medicine Cleft Palate Complementary & Alternative Medicine Congenital Diseases Dentistry Ear Nose & Throat Food Safety Geriatrics Healthcare Hearing Medical Devices MRSA Muscular Dyst...

AIDS; Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome. HIV; Human Immunodeficiency Virus HIV infection causes AIDS. HIV infection also causes the production of anti-HIV antibodies, which forms the test for HIV in patients. People who have the HIV antibodies are ...

Searches Linking to this Trial