Randomised Controlled Trial of Intubation, Comparing Pentax AWS Against Macintosh Laryngoscope.

2014-07-23 21:11:25 | BioPortfolio


A randomised controlled trial of intubation during rapid sequence induction by inexperienced anaesthetists, comparing the The Pentax Airway Scope AWS-S100 Rigid Video Laryngoscope(Pentax AWS) and the Macintosh Laryngoscope.


General anaesthesia often requires that the trachea be protected by intubation. This involves placement of a cuffed endotracheal tube into the trachea, after the onset of unconsciousness and muscle relaxation. Usually this requires the anaesthetist to obtain a direct view of the patient's vocal cords via the mouth, using a laryngoscope such as the Macintosh laryngoscope. The endotracheal tube is then guided through the vocal cords into the trachea.

Difficult or failed intubation, is a potentially serious and occasionally life threatening complication. This is the unexpected inability to place the endotracheal tube in the correct place. The commonest cause is a failure to achieve an adequate view of the vocal cords at laryngoscopy.

Failed or difficult intubation significantly delays establishment of a secure airway and therefore can lead to major morbidity from hypoxia and/or aspiration of gastric contents. Other morbidity can also ensue from delay to the procedure in emergency situations or airway trauma due the various devices used or the force required to secure intubation. Whilst all anaesthetists and their assistants are trained to deal with difficult or failed intubations, disasters do occur. For example, in obstetrics, the previous Confidential Enquiry into Maternal Deaths reported five of the six deaths directly due to anaesthesia were related to intubation difficulties.

The Pentax Airway Scope AWS-S100 (Pentax AWS), Rigid Video Laryngoscope for Intubation is a new self-contained video laryngoscope with an integral colour-viewing screen mounted on the handle. A camera at the tip transmits an indirect image, which obviates the need to obtain a direct view of the vocal cords. It requires no prior set-up of equipment and is intuitive to use for anyone already competent in traditional direct laryngoscopy. Previously conducted evaluations of the scope have been presented and show that intubation can be secured within a clinically normal time span by various grades of anaesthetists in various clinical situations. Authors are currently suggesting it has a role as a back-up device for difficult intubations and for training. One has been obtained for the Foresterhill site for these purposes.

RATIONALE The simplicity of use and intuitive function of the Pentax AWS suggests it may have a wider role than as a back-up and could possibly be the first-line laryngoscope for situations where difficult intubations are more likely or more hazardous. This is most often the case when there is a risk of the patient regurgitating and aspirating their stomach contents. It is in these circumstances that unexpected difficulty carries the highest risk, precisely because of the increased possibility of pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents. Rapid Sequence Induction is a commonly practiced technique of placing an endotracheal tube into the trachea in this situation to minimise the risk of aspiration of gastric contents.

Compounding this issue, the incidence of difficult or failed intubation for an individual anaesthetist is related to their experience, decreasing as experience increases.

There is already a body of work that suggests the Pentax AWS is as good as the Macintosh in a number of elective clinical situations, but no published studies relating to emergency rapid sequence induction.

The purpose of this trial is to evaluate the Pentax AWS when used by relatively inexperienced anaesthetists during rapid sequence induction. Inexperienced anaesthetists are those most likely to encounter difficulties and rapid sequence induction is the situation where unexpected difficulty carries the highest risk. Therefore, this is a setting in which there would be a particular benefit to patient safety in having the most effective tool for successful and timely completion of tracheal intubation.

METHODS The study will compare intubation using the Pentax AWS vs. the usual Macintosh laryngoscope in a sample of patients where 1st and 2nd year specialist trainees in anaesthesia (ST's) perform the intubation. There will be no other change in routine practice for the purposes of the trial. Specifically, the trial will recruit only from the population of patients that the ST's are routinely scheduled to intubate anyway. They will be working under the direct supervision of a consultant or senior specialist registrar (SpR), at all times.

Initially, data relating to routine intubations with the Macintosh laryngoscope will be collected. We will conduct training in the method of use of the Pentax AWS with the ST's, to a pre-determined level (see below) and collect and compare learning data, during routine clinical work with this laryngoscope. Following on from this, we will determine the effectiveness of the Pentax AWS in patients undergoing rapid sequence induction.

6 ST's will perform the intubations within the trial. They fulfil the experience criteria required of the study, they began anaesthetic training between August 2008 and August 2009, have reached the required Royal College of Anaesthetists' level of competency in the practice of intubation and are approved to anaesthetise with indirect supervision.

Prior to commencement of recruitment into this study, it will be necessary for these ST anaesthetists to demonstrate a level of ability with the Pentax AWS comparable with their ability with the Macintosh laryngoscope, which their prior intubation experience will have focused around. This is in order not to compromise safety in those patients randomized to undergo intubation with the Pentax AWS. They will record the success or failure and time to completion of each traditional intubation they perform in routine clinical practice with a Macintosh laryngoscope to give initial information about their personal success rate. This will be used to establish a median time to complete intubation for each anaesthetist with the Macintosh laryngoscope. They will be trained in the use of the Pentax AWS by the principle investigator (PI), initially using an airway training manikin and then in normal clinical practice. After gaining basic skill with the Pentax AWS, intubation with this scope will be timed. Training with the Pentax AWS will continue until the ST anaesthetist is able to intubate within ten seconds of their time to complete intubation with the Macintosh laryngoscope and has performed this during ten consecutive procedures. Once assessed as competent with the Pentax AWS by the PI they will be eligible to intubate patients entering the trial.

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label




Macintosh Laryngoscope, Pentax AWS Videolaryngoscope


Aberdeen Royal Infirmary
United Kingdom
AB25 2ZN


Not yet recruiting


NHS Grampian

Results (where available)

View Results


Published on BioPortfolio: 2014-07-23T21:11:25-0400

Clinical Trials [338 Associated Clinical Trials listed on BioPortfolio]

A Comparison of McGrath, Pentax and Macintosh Laryngoscopes for Nasotracheal Intubation in Pediatrics

Videolaryngoscope provide better view of the larynx. This better view could improve the navigation of endotracheal tube in nasotracheal intubation. Contrast to the improved result in adult...

Comparison of the Videolaryngoscopes With Manual In-line Stabilization

Videolaryngoscope is useful to improve the laryngeal view, especially during difficult intubation. There are several kinds of videolaryngoscopes and it is applicable during nasotracheal in...

KoMAC Videolaryngoscope for Double-lumen Intubation

KoMAC videolaryngoscope is a portable intubating device with an angulated single-use blade of adjustable size and a liquid crystal display monitor mounted on top of the handle, which is si...

Hemodynamic Responses of Different Laryngoscopes

During laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation, stimulation of supraglottic regions leads to an increase in the plasma catecholamine concentrations due to the activation of the sympatho-a...

A Comparison of Pentax AWS Videolaryngoscopy and Macintosh Laryngoscopy for Orotracheal Intubation in Children: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison of Intubation using Pentax (Pentas AWS, Pentax, Tokyo, Japan) and Machintoch in pediatric patients

PubMed Articles [523 Associated PubMed Articles listed on BioPortfolio]

C-MAC videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.

The C-MAC laryngoscope (C-MAC) is a videolaryngoscope that uses a modified Macintosh blade. Although several anecdotal reports exist, it remains unclear whether the C-MAC is superior to the Macintosh ...

Comparison of the ease of tracheal intubation using a McGrath Mac videolaryngoscope and a standard Macintosh laryngoscope in normal airways: A randomised trial.

Comparison of the Contact Force Exerted on Teeth by Conventional Macintosh Laryngoscope Versus Video Laryngoscopes.

During laryngoscopy, the laryngoscope blade sometimes comes in contact with the teeth, fracturing or dislocating them. However, no studies have compared the effects of newly marketed video laryngoscop...

Measurement of forces applied using a Macintosh direct laryngoscope compared with a Glidescope video laryngoscope in patients with predictors of difficult laryngoscopy: A randomised controlled trial.

In patients with predictive features associated with easy direct laryngoscopy, videolaryngoscoy with the GlideScope has been shown to require less force when compared with Macintosh direct laryngoscop...

Postoperative laryngeal morbidity using the McGRATH MAC videolaryngoscope.

Medical and Biotech [MESH] Definitions

None available.

More From BioPortfolio on "Randomised Controlled Trial of Intubation, Comparing Pentax AWS Against Macintosh Laryngoscope."

Quick Search


Relevant Topics

Arthritis Fibromyalgia Gout Lupus Rheumatic Rheumatology is the medical specialty concerned with the diagnosis and management of disease involving joints, tendons, muscles, ligaments and associated structures (Oxford Medical Diction...

An anesthesiologist (US English) or anaesthetist (British English) is a physician trained in anesthesia and perioperative medicine. Anesthesiologists are physicians who provide medical care to patients in a wide variety of (usually acute) situations. ...

Searches Linking to this Trial