Track topics on Twitter Track topics that are important to you
The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of pioglitazone, once daily (QD), and glimepiride combination therapy compared to glimepiride monotherapy in subjects with Type 2 Diabetes.
Tight glycemic control is mandatory for the prevention and treatment of vascular complications in patients suffering from diabetes mellitus. After onset of Type 2 Diabetes, patients are usually treated with diet along with or without different combinations of oral drugs. One first-line drug class are sulfonylurea drugs that are preferably provided to patients who are not obese. The mode of action of sulfonylurea drugs is to increase beta-cell secretion, but it could be shown that they lead to deterioration of the beta-cell secretion product over time, resulting in increased proinsulin secretion. Since proinsulin is an independent cardiovascular risk factor, recent publications have demonstrated an increased risk for cardiovascular events in patients treated with sulfonylurea drugs as compared to other treatment methods.
Combination therapy of sulfonylurea drugs with glitazones has been shown to counterbalance the effect of deteriorated beta-cell secretion and to improve insulin sensitivity and the levels of proinsulin, C-peptide and other laboratory surrogate markers for cardiovascular risk. Proving that the treatment of diabetic patients with higher doses of beta cytotropic agents can be avoided and beta-cell function can be preserved by using pioglitazone in combination with low dose sulfonylurea drugs, it will be possible to optimize the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes who are not controlled efficiently by sulfonylurea drugs monotherapy.
In this study patients will be enrolled who are inefficiently treated with a Glimepiride monotherapy. Patients will be either randomized to a combinational therapy of Pioglitazone and Glimepiride or Glimepiride monotherapy. If possible, study medication will be up-titrated to maximal dosage levels in both treatment arms to observe maximal and comparable treatment effects. Stable effects on beta-cell function will be observed after 24 weeks of treatment.
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Pioglitazone and Glimepiride, Glimepiride
Takeda Global Research & Development Center, Inc.
Published on BioPortfolio: 2014-08-27T03:27:02-0400
The primary purpose of this study is to compare the effects of pioglitazone, once daily (QD), versus glimepiride on the amount of thickening of the carotid artery.
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of pioglitazone plus alogliptin plus metformin with glimepiride plus alogliptin plus metformin on glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) chan...
The purpose of the study is to determine the effect of glimepiride on dapagliflozin and the effect of dapagliflozin on glimepiride in healthy volunteers. In addition, the safety and toler...
This study is being carried out to see if dapagliflozin in addition to glimepiride (sulphonylurea) is effective and safe in treating patients with type 2 diabetes when compared to glimepir...
The purpose of this study is to compare pioglitazone and metformin combination therapy, twice daily (BID), to glimepiride and metformin combination therapy for treating diabetic subjects w...
Type 2 diabetes and obesity are pro-inflammatory states associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Canagliflozin, an SGLT2 inhibitor, demonstrated superiority in lowering HbA1c versus g...
Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide monotherapy compared to glimepiride in East Asian patients with type 2 diabetes in a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-arm, active comparator, phase 3 trial.
To compare the efficacy and safety of once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist dulaglutide 1.5 mg and 0.75 mg with glimepiride in East Asian (EA) patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).
To assess the effect of empagliflozin on bone fractures and bone mineral density in patients with type 2 diabetes in pooled placebo-controlled trial data and a head-to-head study versus glimepiride.
Pioglitazone has been widely used as an insulin-sensitizing agent for improving glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, cardiovascular risk and protective effects of piogl...
Prior research suggests that warfarin, when given concomitantly with some sulfonylureas, may increase the risk of serious hypoglycemia. However, the clinical significance remains unclear. We examined ...
A subclass of DIABETES MELLITUS that is not INSULIN-responsive or dependent (NIDDM). It is characterized initially by INSULIN RESISTANCE and HYPERINSULINEMIA; and eventually by GLUCOSE INTOLERANCE; HYPERGLYCEMIA; and overt diabetes. Type II diabetes mellitus is no longer considered a disease exclusively found in adults. Patients seldom develop KETOSIS but often exhibit OBESITY.
Diabetes mellitus induced experimentally by administration of various diabetogenic agents or by PANCREATECTOMY.
Urination of a large volume of urine with an increase in urinary frequency, commonly seen in diabetes (DIABETES MELLITUS; DIABETES INSIPIDUS).
A subtype of DIABETES MELLITUS that is characterized by INSULIN deficiency. It is manifested by the sudden onset of severe HYPERGLYCEMIA, rapid progression to DIABETIC KETOACIDOSIS, and DEATH unless treated with insulin. The disease may occur at any age, but is most common in childhood or adolescence.
A strain of Rattus norvegicus which is a model for spontaneous insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (DIABETES MELLITUS, INSULIN-DEPENDENT).
Blood is a specialized bodily fluid that delivers necessary substances to the body's cells (in animals) – such as nutrients and oxygen – and transports waste products away from those same cells. In vertebrates, it is composed of blo...