Track topics on Twitter Track topics that are important to you
We list hundreds of Clinical Trials about "CS-1008 Used With Irinotecan Versus Irinotecan Alone in Subjects With Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma Who Failed First-line Treatment With Oxaliplatin" on BioPortfolio. We draw our references from global clinical trials data listed on ClinicalTrials.gov and refresh our database daily.
We have published hundreds of CS-1008 Used With Irinotecan Versus Irinotecan Alone in Subjects With Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma Who Failed First-line Treatment With Oxaliplatin news stories on BioPortfolio along with dozens of CS-1008 Used With Irinotecan Versus Irinotecan Alone in Subjects With Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma Who Failed First-line Treatment With Oxaliplatin Clinical Trials and PubMed Articles about CS-1008 Used With Irinotecan Versus Irinotecan Alone in Subjects With Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma Who Failed First-line Treatment With Oxaliplatin for you to read. In addition to the medical data, news and clinical trials, BioPortfolio also has a large collection of CS-1008 Used With Irinotecan Versus Irinotecan Alone in Subjects With Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma Who Failed First-line Treatment With Oxaliplatin Companies in our database. You can also find out about relevant CS-1008 Used With Irinotecan Versus Irinotecan Alone in Subjects With Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma Who Failed First-line Treatment With Oxaliplatin Drugs and Medications on this site too.
The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of CS-1008 in combination with irinotecan compared to irinotecan alone on Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in subjects with metastatic or advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) who have failed oxaliplatin-based first-line treatment.
Treatment with CS-1008 in combination with FOLFIRI (irinotecan, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil [5-FU]) in subjects with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) who have failed first-line treatment that was not irinotecan-based.
This is a 2-part, multicenter, open-label, randomized study of dinutuximab and irinotecan versus irinotecan alone in subjects with relapsed or refractory small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Part 1 of the study involves intrasubject dose escalation to evaluate the safety and tolerability of dinutuximab in combination with irinotecan. Part 2 of the study is designed to determine whether dinutuximab plus irinotecan prolongs overall survival (OS) compared with irinotecan alone. Subjects...
The purpose of this study is to determine whether overall survival is prolonged in subjects with metastatic, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-positive colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab in combination with irinotecan compared with irinotecan alone as second-line therapy following treatment with a fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin based, non-irinotecan-containing regimen.
The medicine being offered in this study is called Irinotecan. Irinotecan has been effective against many animal cancers. It has been given to both adults and children. We are now attempting to determine how much of the drug can be given to children when Irinotecan is given weekly for four weeks in a row every 6 weeks and the toxicities (bad side effects) that occur when irinotecan is administered on this schedule. The purposes of this study are to: 1. To determine th...
The primary objective of this study is to determine if panitumumab affects the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of irinotecan. The hypothesis is panitumumab does not affect the PK of irinotecan. This will be concluded if the 90% confidence intervals of the ratio of geometric means for the Cmax and AUC for irinotecan with and without concomitant panitumumab administration fall inside the interval of 70-143%.
Research Hypothesis: Subjects in the study population who are treated with cetuximab in combination with irinotecan will have higher response rates than subjects treated with irinotecan alone.
After failure of first-line therapy, single agent of irinotecan is used as second line treatment in locally advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junctional adenocarcinoma. The purpose of this study is to evaluate it there will be more benefit with irinotecan plus apatinib.
Objective: To determine activity of combo of Irinotecan + Temozolomide To further characterize any toxicity associated w combo of Irinotecan + Temozolomide
Primary Objectives To determine maxi tolerated dose & dose limiting toxicity of SU011248 + Irinotecan in recurrent MG pts not on EIAEDs To characterize safety & tolerability of SU011248 + Irinotecan among pts w recurrent MG Secondary Objectives To evaluate pharmacokinetic profile of SU011248 & Irinotecan when co-administered in pts w MG To evaluate anti-tumor activity of SU011248 + Irinotecan
This randomized phase II study compare survival outcomes and toxicity of two chemotherapy regimens (irinotecan plus lobaplatin or irinotecan) for the second-line treatment of recurrent small-cell lung cancer.
New treatments are greatly needed for patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Metronomic temozolomide is a standard treatment option but has, at best, modest activity. The nanoliposomal irinotecan may be much more active than the parent compound irinotecan since nanoliposomal irinotecan's ability to cross the blood brain barrier is improved. This phase I study will establish the MTD of the combination of nanoliposomal irinotecan in combination with temozolomide safety and prelimi...
This study is being performed to test if the use of high dose of cetuximab in combination with irinotecan overcomes the resistance seen with standard dose of cetuximab plus irinotecan in patients with wild type KRS tumors that have advanced colon or rectal cancer
This study is a randomized, open-label, controlled study that will compare the efficacy of oxaliplatin in combination with irinotecan to irinotecan alone as second-line treatment for patients with gemcitabine and S-1 refractory pancreatic cancer.
This study evaluates the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of oral administration of irinotecan in adult patients. Oral irinotecan will be administered as monotherapy in a dose escalation trial to establish the Maximal Tolerated Dose. Totally 25 patients will be treated with irinotecan tablets as mono-therapy. As an extension trial 12 patients will be treated with oral irinotecan in combination with oral capecitabine
To compare the effects and safety of Anlotinib Plus Irinotecan versus Irinotecan in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma(ESCC).
This is a Phase II, open-label, multicenter, randomized, non comparative study consisting of two concurrent single-arms. Approximately 160 subjects will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to Arm 1 (bevacizumab alone) or Arm 2 (bevacizumab + irinotecan).
This study is designed to investigate the effect of second-line irinotecan and capecitabine versus irinotecan alone for gemcitabine and cisplatin refractory advanced biliary tract cancer patients.
Trial evaluating the efficacy of regorafenib combined with irinotecan compared to irinotecan alone in second-line treatment of patients with metastatic gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinomas.
E7070 and irinotecan will be administered to patients with GI tract, pancreatic or lung tumors on Days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle, or Days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle according to one of two E7070 dose escalation schemes.
To see how well enzastaurin in combination with irinotecan and cetuximab works versus irinotecan and cetuximab in patients who have progressed within 3 months.
This 2 arm study will compare the effect of Avastin + irinotecan versus temozolomide, in combination with conventional involved field radiotherapy, in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma and a non-methylated MGMT promoter. Patients will be randomized 3:1 to receive Avastin 10mg/kg iv every 2 weeks + irinotecan 125mg/m2 iv every 2 weeks, or temozolomide 75mg/m2 po daily during radiotherapy followed by 6 cycles of temozolomide 150-200mg/m2 po daily on days 1-5 of each 4 we...
This study is designed to compare the efficacy and safety of FOLFIRI regimen with irinotecan monodrug in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer patients in the second-line setting.
Primary Objectives: 1. To determine the efficacy of the topoisomerase I (topo I) inhibitor irinotecan, delivered via a low-dose protracted schedule to patients with advanced sarcoma. 2. To determine the toxicity profile of irinotecan, using a protracted schedule, in this pretreated patient population.
The purpose of this Phase I study is to find the largest dose of the drug irinotecan, in combination with ZD1839, that can be given safely to children and to learn the good and bad effects. Studies performed in the laboratory have shown that ZD1839 helps make available the orally administered irinotecan. In this study the intravenous (given into the vein) formula of irinotecan will be given orally on days 1-5 and days 8-12. The dose of ZD1839 will be a fixed dose and will be...