Advertisement

Topics

Experts argue it's time to stop using bite marks in forensics

19:00 EST 30 Nov 2016 | AAAS

(Oxford University Press USA) Researchers are increasingly skeptical about the validity of bite-mark identification as trial evidence. A new paper in Journal of Law and the Biosciences describes the legal basis for the rise of bite-mark identification and reviews relevant empirical research on bite-mark identification -- highlighting both the lack of research and the lack of support provided by what research does exist.

Original Article: Experts argue it's time to stop using bite marks in forensics

NEXT ARTICLE

More From BioPortfolio on "Experts argue it's time to stop using bite marks in forensics"

Quick Search
Advertisement