Comparison Between LISS Plating and Intramedullary (IM) Nailing for Supracondylar Femur Fractures

2014-07-24 14:19:32 | BioPortfolio


The purpose of this study is to compare patient outcomes for the Less Invasive Stabilization System (LISS) (Synthes {USA}, Paoli, PA, USA), a minimally invasive plating system used in the treatment of supracondylar femur fractures, with patient outcomes for the Supracondylar Nail (Smith & Nephew Inc, Memphis, TN, USA), a retrograde intramedullary nail.


All patients who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be randomized into one of two treatment groups. Group A patients will be treated with retrograde intramedullary nailing of the fracture with supplemental screw fixation of the articular portion of the fracture if needed. The Richards supracondylar nail (Smith & Nephew Richards, Memphis, TN, USA) will be utilized. Group B patients will have their fracture stabilized with the LISS plates (Synthes [USA], Paoli, PA, USA). Supplemental screw fixation of the articular portion of the fracture will occur, if needed. Postoperative care will not be any different than the postoperative care of any other patient undergoing internal fixation of a complex fracture around the knee and based on the patient's overall condition.

Surgical Protocol: After the anesthesia staff has administered general anesthesia, the patient will be positioned on the operating room table as described by the intraoperative technique guide or according to the patient's injury and the surgeon's preference. The patient will be prepped and draped in the usual and customary manner for orthopaedic procedures of the lower extremities. The image intensifier will be available for intraoperative fluoroscopy. The manufacturer's surgical technique guide will be used intraoperatively for implantation of the LISS device and the supracondylar nail. The surgical wound will be closed according to the surgeon's preference. A drainage device may be used if indicated. Routine dressings will be applied. In all instances, immediate postoperative radiographs will be taken to document adequate reduction and fixation. Neurovascular evaluation of the extremity will be performed and documented when the patient emerges from the anesthetic. The patient will be discharged from the recovery room to the postoperative unit when they have met discharge criteria. Routine postoperative orders will be followed until discharge from the hospital.

Patients will be followed in the orthopaedic clinic at predetermined intervals following surgery. The clinic visits will include anterior-posterior and lateral radiographs of the affected extremity and a clinical examination. The patient will also complete the SF-36 (Appendix 1) and a pain scale (Appendix 2). This data will be used to compare the outcomes obtained with the two devices. Clinical follow-up will occur at 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 26, and 52 weeks following surgery. Radiographs will be obtained at 4, 8, 12, 18, 26, and 52 weeks postoperatively. Patients will complete pain scales at 4, 8, 12, 18, 26, and 52 weeks after surgery. Clinical outcomes will be evaluated at weeks 12, 26, and 52.

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment


Supracondylar Femur Fracture


IM Nailing, LISS


The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Orthopaedic Trauma
United States


Active, not recruiting


University of Alabama at Birmingham

Results (where available)

View Results


Published on BioPortfolio: 2014-07-24T14:19:32-0400

Clinical Trials [360 Associated Clinical Trials listed on BioPortfolio]

Prospective Randomized Clinical Study to Evaluate the Effects of Less Invasive Stabilization System (LISS) Plating Techniques in Distal Femoral Fractures

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the rate of fracture healing and fracture union, repaired with the LISS device, will be as good as or better than the usual fracture fixat...

Intramedullary Nailing of the Femur:Trochanteric vs Piriformis Starting Portals

This project is designed to determine whether or not the trochanteric insertion portal will show any difference when compared with the piriformis fossa portal in terms of pain and strength...

Assessment of the Risk of Contralateral Non Simultaneous Neck of Femur Fracture in the Elderly.

Neck of femur fractures are common in the elderly and are the source of significant morbidity and mortality. This study is based on a new technique developed in Ben Gurion University, with...

Functional Outcome and MRI of Muscle Damage Following Nailing Procedure in Femur (Thigh) Fractures Using Different Entry Points

Study focus is femoral shaft (thigh bone) fractures (break) that require surgical treatment under anaesthetic to stabilize the femur fracture. This is usually done by placing a metal nail...

Treatment of Type I Supracondylar Fractures of the Humerus

Type I supracondylar fractures are elbow fractures that occur in children aged 3-10 years. Many different treatment options exist to treat this type of fracture. The purpose of this study ...

PubMed Articles [1131 Associated PubMed Articles listed on BioPortfolio]

Outcomes of Surgical Management of Supracondylar Periprosthetic Femur Fractures.

Fracture location is an important consideration in managing supracondylar periprosthetic femur fractures. The outcomes of locked plating and intramedullary (IM) nail fixation were therefore compared b...

Biomechanical Analysis of Retrograde Flexible Intramedullary Nail Constructs in a Simulated Pediatric Femur Fracture Model.

Various flexible intramedullary nail (FIMN) constructs for pediatric femur fractures are described; however, no biomechanical study has compared stability of medial-lateral entry versus all-lateral en...

Biomechanical Consequences of Anterior Femoral Notching in Cruciate-Retaining Versus Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Anterior femoral notching during total knee arthroplasty is a potential risk factor for periprosthetic supracondylar femur fracture. We conducted a study to determine if the design of the femoral impl...

Comparison of supraintercondylar and supracondylar femur fractures treated with condylar buttress plates.

Treatment of supraintercondylar (AO/OTA 33-C) and supracondylar (AO/OTA 33-A) femur fractures is generally challenging. Standard treatments include open reduction and internal fixation. However, optim...

Assessing Quality and Safety in Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fracture Care.

Recently, there has been an emphasis on improving quality, safety, and value in the delivery of health care in the United States. The American Board of Orthopedic Surgery (ABOS) has developed a perfor...

Medical and Biotech [MESH] Definitions

Implantable fracture fixation devices attached to bone fragments with screws to bridge the fracture gap and shield the fracture site from stress as bone heals. (UMDNS, 1999)

The constricted portion of the thigh bone between the femur head and the trochanters.

Fracture in the proximal half of the shaft of the ulna, with dislocation of the head of the radius.

The use of metallic devices inserted into or through bone to hold a fracture in a set position and alignment while it heals.

Fracture of the lower end of the radius in which the lower fragment is displaced posteriorly.

More From BioPortfolio on "Comparison Between LISS Plating and Intramedullary (IM) Nailing for Supracondylar Femur Fractures"

Quick Search

Relevant Topic

Osteoporosis is a disease in which the bones become extremely porous, are subject to fracture, and heal slowly, occurring especially in women following menopause and often leading to curvature of the spine from vertebral collapse. Follow and track&n...

Searches Linking to this Trial